Teachers using annotations to engage students in assessment conversations: recontextualising knowledge

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 495-515

  Willis, Jill ^a   Adie, Lenore ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

annotation; assessment for learning; assessment standards; recontextualising

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917735397     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585176.2014.968599     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adie, L., & Willis, J. (2014). Using annotations to inform an understanding of achievement standards. Assessment Matters, 6, 112–136.
2. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809101133/http://assessment-reform-group.org/CIE3.PDF
3. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
4. Ball, E. C. (2010). Annotation an effective device for student feedback: A critical review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 138–143.
5. Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Policies of Education, 32(4), 625–639.
6. Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control. Vol. 4. The structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
7. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.
8. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9. Bernstein, B. (2004). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com
10. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2005). The dissemination of formative assessment: A lesson from, or about, evaluation. Research Intelligence, 92, 14–15.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1988). Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: nferNelson.
12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Kappan classic: A pleasant surprise. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 47–48.
14. Crisp, V., & Johnson, M. (2007). The use of annotations in examination marking: Opening a window into workers’ minds. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 943–961.
15. Davies, A. (2011). Making classroom assessment work. Courtenay, BC: Connections Publishing.
16. Doherty, A., Dooley, K., & Woods, A. (2013). Teaching sociology within teacher education: Revisiting, realigning and re-embedding. Journal of Sociology, 49(4), 515–530.
17. Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2014). Challenging conceptions of assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert. (Eds.). Designing assessment for quality learning, the enabling power of assessment. Dordrecht: Springer.
18. Eisenhardt, K. (2002). Building theories from case study research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 5–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: Possibilities, boundaries and limitations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 13(2), 215–232.
20. Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children's rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25(3), 335–353.
21. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon: Routledge.
22. Heinrich, E. (2004). Electronic repositories of marked student work and their contributions to formative evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 7(3), 82–96.
23. Johansen, S. J. (1998). “What were you thinking?” Using annotated portfolios to improve student assessment. The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, 4(1), 123–147.
24. Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. London: Sage Publications.
25. McGuire, L. (2005). Assessment using new technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 265–276.
26. Porter-O’Donnell, C. (2004). Beyond the yellow highlighter: Teaching annotation skills to improve reading comprehension. English Journal, 93(5), 82–89.
27. Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating Achievement Standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.
28. Sadler, D. R. (2013). Opening up feedback. Teaching learners to see. In Merry, S. (Ed). Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students. New York: Routledge.
29. Sadler, R. (1998, July). Letting students into the secret: Further steps in making criteria and standards work to improve learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for State Review Panels and District Panel Chairs, Brisbane. Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs11_12/assessment/docs/criteria.pdf
30. Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
31. Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein's theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.
32. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge
33. Sutton, R. (2014). Questioning for secondary schools, in Canada and elsewhere. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1770/1/1770.pdf http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1770/1/1770.pdf
34. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
35. Wiliam, D. (2009). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. Adrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Taylor and Francis.
36. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.
37. Wiliam, D. (2012). Sustaining formative assessment with teacher learning communities. Retrieved from http://files.hbe.com.au/email/links/EmbeddedFormativeAssessment_ChapterX.pdf
38. Willis, J., & Adie, L. (2013). Negotiating the meaning of achievement standards in the Australian curriculum. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(1), 52–62.
39. Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 1–16.
40. Zywica, J., & Gomez, K. (2008). Annotating to support learning in the content areas: Teaching and learning science. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(2), 155–165.