Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy

SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 167-178

  Black, Paul ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919842833     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n10     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Alexander, R. (2008a). Towards dialogic thinking: rethinking classroom talk. (4th ed.) York, UK: Dialogos.
2. Alexander, R. (2008b). Essays in pedagogy. Abingdon UK: Routledge.
3. Black, P. (1994). Performance assessment and accountability: The experience in England and Wales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 191-203.
4. Black, P. (2009). Looking again at formative assessment. Learning and Teaching Update, 30, 3-5.
5. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers' summative assessments. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 215-232.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, M., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers' summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education, 18(4), 451-469.
7. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning-putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
8. Black, P., Harrison, C., Osborne, J., & Duschl, R. (2004). Assessment of Science Learning 14-19. London: Royal Society. Retrieved from http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/education
9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Large-scale assessment systems: Design principles drawn from international comparisons. Measurement, 5(1) 1-53.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.
12. Boyd, B., & Hayward, L. (2010). Exploring assessment for accountability. Glasgow: Universities of Strathclyde and Glasgow.
13. Brookhart, S. M. (2011, June). The use of teacher judgment for summative assessment in the United States: Weighed in the balance and found wanting. Paper presented at the Oxford Centre for Educational Assessment seminar, Oxford, UK.
14. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton for Harvard University Press.
15. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1-14.
16. Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 101-116.
17. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
18. European Commission. (2010). Assessment of key competences: Draft background paper for the Belgian presidency meeting for directors-general for school education. Brussels: Author.
19. Fairbrother, R. (2008). The validity of key stage 2 science tests. School Science Review, (329), 107-114.
20. Fitzgerald, A., & Gunstone, R. (2012). Embedding assessment within primary school science lessons: A case study. In R.Gunstone & A.Jones (eds.), Assessment in Science Education. Melbourne: Springer.
21. Fleer, M., & Quinones, G. (2012). Building an assessment pedagogy for, with, and of early childhood science learning: An assessment Perezhivanie. In R.Gunstone & A.Jones (eds.), Assessment in Science Education. Melbourne: Springer.
22. Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope. New York: Continuum.
23. Gardner, J. (2007, Summer). Is teaching a "partial" profession? Making the Grade: Journal of the Institute of Educational Assessors, 18-21.
24. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (with Montgomery, M.). (2010). Developing teacher assessment. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
25. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., & Stobart, G. (2011). Engaging and empowering teachers in innovative assessment practice. In R.Berry & B.Adamson (eds.), Assessment reform in education (pp. 105-120). New York: Springer.
26. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (1999). Pedagogy in the secondary school. In P.Mortimore (ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 68-97). London: Paul Chapman.
27. Hallam, S., Kirton, A., Peffers, J., Robertson, P., & Stobart, G. (2004). Evaluation of project 1 of the assessment is for learning development program: Support for professional practice in formative assessment. Final report. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/education/ep1aldps-00.asp
28. Hayward, H., Dow, W., & Boyd, B. (2008). Sharing the standard. Report for LTScotland. Retrieved from http://wayback.archive-it.org/1961/20100730134209/http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/resources/s/genericresource_tcm4579679.asp?strReferringChannel=assess
29. Hodgen, J., & Marshall, B. (2005). Assessment for learning in mathematics and English: Contrasts and resemblances. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 153-176.
30. Hume, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education: Principals, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 269-290.
31. Koretz, D. (1998). Large scale portfolio assessments in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education, 5(3), 309-334.
32. Kuiper, W., & Oettevanger, W. (in press). Aligning science curriculum renewal efforts and assessment practices. In R.Gunstone & A.Jones (eds.), Assessment in science education, Melbourne: Springer.
33. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
34. Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 85-102.
35. Priestley, M., Miller, K., Barrett, L., & Wallace, C. (2011). Teacher learning communities and educational change in Scotland. British Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 265-284.
36. Shapley, K. S., & Bush, M. J. (1999). Developing a valid and reliable portfolio assessment in the primary grades: Building on practical experience. Applied Measurement in Education, 12(2), 111-132.
37. Shulman, L. S. (1999). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. In J.Leach & B.Moon (eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 61-71). London: Chapman.
38. Stanley, G., McCann, R., Gardner, J., Reynolds, L., & Wild, I. (2009). Review of teacher assessment: What works best and issues for development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Centre for Educational Development.
39. Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2005). Grade inflation and school competition: an empirical analysis based on the Swedish upper secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(3), 309-322.
40. Wiske, M. S. (1999). What is teaching for understanding? In J.Leach & B.Moon (eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 230-246). London: Chapman.
41. Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
42. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers' judgment practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principals, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59-75.