Development and validation of a multi-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples

GigaScience

Volumn 6, Issue 10, 2017, Pages

  Arulandhu, Alfred J ^a   Staats, Martijn ^a   Hagelaar, Rico ^a   Voorhuijzen, Marleen M ^a   Prins, Theo W ^a   Scholtens, Ingrid ^a   Costessi, Adalberto ^b   Duijsings, Danny ^b   Rechenmann, François ^c   Gaspar, Frédéric B ^d   Barreto Crespo, Maria Teresa ^d   Holst Jensen, Arne ^e   Birck, Matthew ^f   Burns, Malcolm ^g   Haynes, Edward ^h   Hochegger, Rupert ⁱ   Klingl, Alexander ^j   Lundberg, Lisa ^k   Natale, Chiara ^l   Niekamp, Hauke ^m   Perri, Elena ⁿ   Barbante, Alessandra ⁿ   Rosec, Jean Philippe ^o   Seyfarth, Ralf ^p   Sovova, Tereza ^q   Van Moorleghem, Christoff ^r   van Ruth, Saskia ^a   Peelen, Tamara ^s   Kok, Esther ^a   more..

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b BaseClear BV   (Netherlands)

^c GenoStar Bioinformatics Solutions   (France)

^d INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA EXPERIMENTAL E TECNOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^e NORWEGIAN VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^f US Customs and Border Protection   (United States)

^g LGC   (United Kingdom)

^h FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ AUSTRIAN AGENCY FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY   (Austria)

^j Dienstort Hamburg   (Germany)

^k Livsmedelsverket   (Sweden)

^l Laboratori e servizi chimici Laboratorio Chimico di Genova   (Italy)

^m Eurofins Medinet Inc   (Germany)

ⁿ CREA SCS sede di Tavazzano Laboratorio   (Italy)

^o Universitaire de Montpellier   (France)

^p Biolytix AG   (Switzerland)

^q CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^r Laboratory of Customs and Excises   (Belgium)

^s Dutch Customs Laboratory   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

CITES; COI; Customs agencies; cyt b; DNA metabarcoding; Endangered species; matK; Mini barcodes; rbcL; Traditional medicines

Indexed keywords

AMPLICON; APPLICABILITY; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; DNA BARCODING; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DRY WEIGHT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOOD COMPOSITION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MULTI LOCUS DNA METABARCODING; NONHUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION STUDY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; PLANT;

PLANT DNA;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, PLANT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; PLANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 85031727527     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2047217X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/gix080     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Chang C, Jang-Liaw N, Lin Y et al. Authenticating the use of dried seahorses in the traditional Chinese medicine market in Taiwan using molecular forensics. J Food Drug Anal 2013;21:310-6.
2. Lee SY, Ng WL, Mahat MN et al. DNA barcoding of the endangered aquilaria (Thymelaeaceae) and its application in species authentication of agarwood products traded in the market. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154631.
3. Milner-Gulland EJ, Bukreeva OM, Coulson T et al. Conservation: reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems. Nature 2003;422:135.
4. CITES.www.cites.org. Accessed 12 September 2017.
5. Cheng X, Su X, Chen X et al. Biological ingredient analysis of traditional Chinese medicine preparation based on highthroughput sequencing: the story for Liuwei Dihuang Wan. Sci Rep 2015;4:5147.
6. Coghlan ML, Haile J, Houston J et al. Deep sequencing of plant and animal DNA contained within traditional Chinese medicines reveals legality issues and health safety concerns. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002657.
7. Coghlan ML, Maker G, Crighton E et al. Combined DNA, toxicological and heavy metal analyses provides an auditing toolkit to improve pharmacovigilance of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Sci Rep 2015;5:17475.
8. Ivanova NV, Kuzmina ML, Braukmann TWA et al. Authentication of herbal supplements using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156426.
9. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F et al. Towards nextgeneration biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 2012;21:2045-50.
10. Staats M, Arulandhu AJ, Gravendeel B et al. Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016;408: 4615-30.
11. Fahner NA, Shokralla S, Baird DJ et al. Large-scale monitoring of plants through environmental DNA metabarcoding of soil: recovery, resolution, and annotation of four DNA markers. PLoS One 2016;11:e0157505.
12. Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Peelen T et al. DNA metabarcoding of endangered plant and animal species in seized forensic samples. Genome 2015;188-9.
13. Taylor HR, Harris WE. An emergent science on the brink of irrelevance: a review of the past 8 years of DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour 2012;12:377-88.
14. Little DP. A DNA mini-barcode for land plants. Mol Ecol Resour 2014;14:437-46.
15. Parveen I, Gafner S, Techen N et al. DNA barcoding for the identification of botanicals in herbal medicine and dietary supplements: strengths and limitations. Planta Med 2016;82:1225-35.
16. RIKILT Wageningen University & Research. www.decathlon-project.eu. Accessed 12 September 2017.
17. RIKILT Wageningen University & Research.http://decathlonfp7. citespipe-wur.surf-hosted.nl:8080/. Accessed 12 September 2017.
18. Chen R, Dong J, Cui X et al. DNA based identification of medicinal materials in Chinese patent medicines. Sci Rep 2012;2:958.
19. Scholtens I, Laurensse E, Molenaar B et al. Practical experiences with an extended screening strategy for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in real-life samples. J Agric Food Chem 2013;61:9097-109.
20. Murray MG, Thompson WF. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 1980;8:4321-6.
21. Ivanova NV, Zemlak TS, Hanner RH et al. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 2007;7: 544-8.
22. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2460-1.
23. Altschul S. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 1997;25:3389-402.
24. Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Hagelaar R. Development and validation of amulti-locus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples SOP. protocols. io. 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.ixbcfin.
25. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 2003;270:313-21.
26. Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL et al. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106: 12794-7.
27. Liu S, Li Y, Lu J et al. SOAP Barcode: revealing arthropod biodiversity through assembly of Illumina shotgun sequences of PCR amplicons. Methods Ecol Evol 2013;4: 1142-50.
28. Gryson N. Effect of food processing on plant DNA degradation and PCR-based GMO analysis: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010;396:2003-22.
29. Tang M, Hardman CJ, Ji Y et al. High-throughput monitoring of wild bee diversity and abundance via mitogenomics. Methods Ecol Evol 2015;6:1034-43.
30. CBOL.www.barcodeofwildlife.org. Accessed 12 September 2017.
31. Galimberti A, De Mattia F, Losa A et al. DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int 2013; 50:55-63.
32. Taberlet P, Coissac E, HajibabaeiMet al. Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 2012;21:1789-93.
33. Iyengar A. Forensic DNA analysis for animal protection and biodiversity conservation: a review. J Nat Conserv 2014;22:195-205.
34. 16s Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation. Illumina document 15044223. https://support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry documentation/16s/16s-metagenomic-libraryprep- guide-15044223-b.pdf.
35. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 2011;17: 10-12.
36. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2011;27:863-4.
37. FASTX Toolkit v. 0.0.14, http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx toolkit/.
38. ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/entrezdirect/.
39. UNEP-WCMC.https://speciesplus.net. Accessed 12 September 2017.
40. Arulandhu AJ, Staats M, Hagelaar R et al. Supplementary data for "Development and validation of a multilocus DNA metabarcoding method to identify endangered species in complex samples." GigaScience Database 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100330.
41. Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S et al. The simple fool's guide to PCR, version 2.0. Privately published document compiled by Palumbi S. Honolulu, HI: Dept. of Zoology, University of Hawaii; 1991:96822.
42. Sarri C, Stamatis C, Sarafidou T et al. A new set of 16S rRNA universal primers for identification of animal species. Food Control 2014;43:35-41.
43. Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front Zool 2013; 10:34.
44. Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M et al. Redesign of PCR primers formitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Mol Ecol Resour 2013;13:851-61.
45. Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstätter H et al. Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int J Legal Med 2000;114:23-28.
46. Fazekas AJ, Kuzmina ML, Newmaster SG et al. DNA barcoding methods for land 39. Methods Mol Biol 2012;858: 223-52.
47. Cuenoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Botany 2002;89:132-44.
48. Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC et al. Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Am J Botany 2003;90:107-15.
49. Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Shiu S. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2007;2: e508.
50. Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR et al. Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS One 2008;3:e2802.
51. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucl Acids Res 2007;35:e14.
52. Chen S, Yao H, Han J et al. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 2010;5:e8613.
53. Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Botany 1997;84:1120-36.
54. Tate JA, Simpson BB. Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Botany 2003;28:723-37.
55. Manning J, Boatwright JS, Daru BH et al. A molecular phylogeny and generic classification of Asphodelaceae subfamily Alooideae: a final resolution of the prickly issue of polyphyly in the alooids? Syst Botany 2014;39:55-74.