Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 107-115

  Levin, Rachel A ^a   Wagner, Warren L ^a   Hoch, Peter C ^b   Nepokroeff, Molly ^c   Pires, J Chris ^d   Zimmer, Elizabeth A ^a   Sytsma, Kenneth J ^d  

^a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^c University of South Dakota   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Camissonia; Megacorax; ndhF; Oenothera; Onagraceae; Onagreae; Phylogeny; rbcL

Indexed keywords

MORPHOLOGY;

CAMISSONIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; GONGYLOCARPUS; LOPEZIA; LUDWIGIA; LYTHRACEAE; MEGACORAX; OENOTHERA; ONAGRACEAE; PRIMULA;

EID: 0242573359     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.1.107     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BAUM, D. A., K. J. SYTSMA, AND P. C. HOCH. 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
2. BERRY, P. E. 1982. The systematics and evolution of Fuchsia Sect. Fuchsia (Onagraceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 1-198.
3. BOUFFORD, D. E. 1982 [1983]. The systematics and evolution of Circaea (Onagraceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 804-994.
4. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
5. BULT, C. J., AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1993. Nuclear ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring tribal relationships within Onagraceae. Systematic Botany 18: 48-63.
6. CARLQUIST, S., AND P. H. RAVEN. 1966. The systematics and anatomy of Gongylocarpus (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany 53: 378-390.
7. CONTI, E., A. FISCHBACH, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1993. Tribal relationships in Onagraceae: implications from rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 672-685.
8. CONTI, E., A. LITT, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 83: 221-233.
9. CONTI, E., A. LITT, P. G. WILSON, S. A. GRAHAM, B. G. BRIGGS, L. A. S. JOHNSON, AND K. J. SYTSMA. 1997. Interfamilial relationships in Myrtales: molecular phylogeny and patterns of morphological evolution. Systematic Botany 22: 629-647.
10. CRISCI, J. V., E. A. ZIMMER, P. C. HOCH, G. B. JOHNSON, C. MUDD, AND N. PAN. 1990. Phylogenetic implications of ribosomal DNA restriction site variation in the plant family Onagraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 523-538.
11. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
12. EYDE, R. H. 1977. Reproductive structures and evolution in Ludwigia (Onagraceae). I. Androecium, placentation, merism. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 64: 644-655.
13. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
14. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
15. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. GILBERT, D. G. 1993. SeqApp: biosequence editor and analysis application. ftp://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/molbio/seqapp/.
17. GONZÁLEZ ELIZONDO, M. S., I. L. LÓPEZ ENRIQUEZ, AND W. L. WAGNER, 2002. Megacorax gracielana (Onagraceae), a new genus and species from Durango, México. Novon 12: 360-365.
18. GRAHAM, S. A., AND T. B. CAVALCANTI. 2001. New chromosome counts in the Lythraceae and a review of chromosome numbers in the family. Systematic Botany 26: 445-458.
19. HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 1990. Stigma form and surface in relation to self-incompatibility in the Onagraceae. Nordic Journal of Botany 10: 1-19.
20. HOCH, P. C., J. V. CRISCI, H. TOBE, AND P. E. BERRY. 1993. A cladistic analysis of the plant family Onagraceae. Systematic Botany 18: 31-47.
21. KURABAYASHI, M., H. LEWIS, AND P. H. RAVEN. 1962. A comparative study of mitosis in Onagraceae. American Journal of Botany 49: 1003-1026.
22. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1997. The plant-book: a portable dictionary of the vascular plants, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
24. MARTIN, P. G., AND J. M. DOWD. 1986. Phylogenetic studies using protein sequences within the order Myrtales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 442-448.
25. MORGAN, D. R., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631-660.
26. MUNZ, P. A. 1965. Onagraceae. North American Flora II 5: 1-278.
27. O'KANE, S. L., JR., AND B. A. SCHAAL. 1998. Phylogenetics of Lopezia (Onagraceae): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction sites. Systematic Botany 23: 5-20.
28. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
29. RAMBAUT, A. 1996. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor, v1.0a1. http:// evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
30. RAVEN, P. H. 1964. The generic subdivision of Onagraceae, tribe Onagreae. Brittonia 16: 276-288.
31. RAVEN, P. H. 1969. A revision of the genus Camissonia (Onagraceae). Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 37: 161-396.
32. RAVEN, P. H. 1976. Generic and sectional delimitation in Onagraceae, tribe Epilobieae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 326-340.
33. RAVEN, P. H. 1979. A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17: 575-593.
34. RAVEN, P. H. 1988. Onagraceae as a model of plant evolution. In L. D. Gottlieb and S. K. Jain [eds.], Plant evolutionary biology: a symposium honoring G. Ledyard Stebbins, 85-107. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
35. RAVEN, P. H., AND W. TAI. 1979. Observations of chromosomes in Ludwigia (Onagraceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66: 862-879.
36. SMITH, J. D., AND J. N. ROSE. 1913. A monograph of the Hauyeae and Gongylocarpeae, tribes of the Onagraceae. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 16: 287-298.
37. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
38. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
39. SYTSMA, K. J., J. MORAWETZ, J. C. PIRES, M. NEPOKROEFF, E. CONTI, M. ZJHRA, J. C. HALL, AND M. W. CHASE. 2002. Urticalean rosids: circumscription, rosid ancestry, and phylogenetics based onrbcL, trnL-F, and ndhF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 1531-1546.
40. SYTSMA, K. J., AND J. F. SMITH. 1988. DNA and morphology: comparisons in the Onagraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 1217-1237.
41. SYTSMA, K. J., AND J. F. SMITH. 1992. Molecular systematics of Onagraceae: examples from Clarkia and Fuchsia. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants. 295-323. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
42. SYTSMA, K. J., J. F. SMITH, AND L. D. GOTTLIEB. 1990. Phylogenetics in Clarkia (Onagraceae): restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany 15: 280-295.
43. SYTSMA, K. J., J. F. SMITH, AND P. C. HOCH. 1991. A chloroplast DNA analysis of tribal and generic relationships within Onagraceae. American Journal of Botany 78: 222 (Abstract).
44. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
45. TOBE, H., W. L. WAGNER, AND H.-C. CHIN. 1987. A systematic and evolutionary study of Oenothera (Onagraceae): seed coat anatomy. Botanical Gazette 148: 235-257.