Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 7, 2008, Pages

  Fazekas, Aron J ^a   Burgess, Kevin S ^b   Kesanakurti, Prasad R ^a   Graham, Sean W ^c   Newmaster, Steven G ^a   Husband, Brian C ^a   Percy, Diana M ^c   Hajibabaei, Mehrdad ^d   Barrett, Spencer C H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA 23S; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PLANT DNA; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA POLYMERASE BETA SUBUNIT; CHLOROPLAST DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MITOCHONDRIAL GENETICS; MONOPHYLY; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT ECOLOGY; PLANT GENETICS; PLASTID; REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TAXONOMY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME, PLANT; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; PLASTIDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 50949125486     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002802     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR (2003) Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270: 313-321.
2. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270 (Suppl.): S96-S99.
3. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RO, et al. (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Phil Trans Lend B 360: 1889-1895.
4. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8369-8374.
5. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Ragupathy S (2006) DNA barcoding in the land plants: evaluation of rbcL in a multigene tiered approach. Can J Bot 84: 335-341.
6. Cowan RS, Chase MW, Kress WJ, Savolainen V (2006) 300,000 species to identify: problems, progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding of land plants. Taxon 55: 611-616.
7. Mower JP, Touzet P, Gummow JS, Delph LY, Palmer JD (2007) Extensive variation in synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial gene of seed plants. BMC Evol Biol 7: 135. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-135..
8. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2(6): e508. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0000508.
9. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, van den Berg C, Madrinan S, et al. (2007) A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56:295-299.
10. Newmaster SG, Fazekas AJ, Steeves RAD, Janovec J (2008) Testing candidate plant barcode regions with species of recent origin in the Myristicaceae. Mol Ecol Notes 8: 480-490. doi:10.1111/ j.1471-8286.2007.02002.x.
11. Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G, Maurin O, Duthoit S, Barraclough TG, Savolainen V (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Prot, Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 2923-2928. doi:10.1073/pnas.0709936105.
12. Pennisi E (2007) Wanted: A barcode for plants. Science 318: 190-191.
13. Presting GG (2006) Identification of conserved regions in the plastid genome: implications for DNA barcoding and biological Function: Can J Bot 84: 1434-1443.
14. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Miquel C, Valentini A, Vermat T, Corthier G, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2006) Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res 35: e1-e8.
15. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7: 355-364. doi:10.1111/ j.1471-8286.2006.01678.x.
16. DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phil Trans Lend B 360: 1905-1916.
17. Little DP, Stevenson DW (2007) A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics 23: 1-21.
18. Cho Y, Mower JP, Qiu Y-L, Palmer JD (2004) Mitachondrial substitution rates are extraordinarily elevated and variable in a genus of flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 17741-17746.
19. Swofford DL (2000) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer.
20. Lee H-L, Yi D-K, Kim J-S, Kim K-J (2007) Development of plant DNA barcoding markers from the variable noncoding regions of chloroplast genome. Abstract presented at the Second International Barcode of Life Conference. Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. September 18-20, 2007. http://www.bolinfonet.org/conferences/assets/files/ conference_abstract_book.pdf.
21. Kress J, Erickson DL (2008) DNA barcodes: Genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 2761-2762.
22. Sass C, Little DP, Stevenson DM, Specht CD (2007) DNA Barcoding in the Cycadales: Testing the Potential of Proposed Barcoding Markers for Species Identification of Cycads. PLoS ONE 2(11): e1154. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0001154.
23. Olmstead RG (1997) Species concepts and plesiomorphic species. Syst Bot 20: 623-630.
24. Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol 46: 523-536.
25. Crisp MD, Chandler GT (1996) Paraphyletic species. Telopea 6: 813-844.
26. Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 34: 397-423.
27. Mort ME, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Mabry M (2000) Comparison of three methods for estimating internal support on phylogenetic trees. Syst Biol 49: 160-171.
28. Govaerts R (2001) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50: 1085-1090.
29. Prance GT (2001) Discovering the Plant World. Taxon 50: 345-360.
30. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparisons of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am J Bot 94: 275-288.
31. Graham SW, Reeves PA, Burns ACE, Olmstead RG (2000) Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int J Plant Sci 161 (6 Suppl.): S83-S96.
32. Craft KJ, Ashely MV (2006) Population differentiation among three species of white oak in northeastern Illinois. Can J For Res 36: 206-215.
33. Jensen RJ, Ciofani KM, Miramontes LC (2002) Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.
34. Xiang L, Werth CR, Emery SN, McCauley DE (2000) Population-specific gender-biased hybridization between Dryopteris intermedia and Dryopleris carthusiana; evidence from chloroplast DNA. Am J Bot 87: 1175-1180.
35. Noyes RD, Rieseberg LH (2000) Two independent loci control agamospermy (apomixis) in the triploid flowering plant Ergeron annuus. Genetics 155: 379-390.
36. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK (2007-onwards) DNA Barcoding, Phase 2 Update. http://www.kew.org/barcoding/update.html (Accessed March 12, 2007).
37. Hall T (2007) BioEdit, version 7.0.9. Carlsbad, CA: Computer Program and documentation, Ibis Biosciences.
38. Rambaut A (2002) Se-Al (Sequence Alignment Editor, version 2.Oa11)., UK: Computer program and documentation, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh.
39. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42: 182-192.
40. Felsenstein J, Kishino H (1993) Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst Biol 42: 193-200.
41. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenics: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
42. Ross HA, Murugan S, Li WLS (2008) Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 57: 216-230.
43. Cho Y, Qui Y-L, Kuhlman P, Palmer JD (1998) Explosive invasion of plant mitochondria by a group I intron. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 14244-12249.
44. Ivanova NV, Fazekas AJ, Hebert PDN (2008) Semi-automated, membrane-based protocol for DNA isolation from plants. Plant Mol Bin Rep [On-line early];doi:10.1007/s11105-008-0029-4.