Erratum: CRISPR-Cas9 conformational activation as elucidated from enhanced molecular simulations (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2017) 114 (7260-7265) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707645114);CRISPR-Cas9 conformational activation as elucidated from enhanced molecular simulations

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 114, Issue 28, 2017, Pages 7260-7265

  Palermo, Giulia ^a   Miao, Yinglong ^a   Walker, Ross C ^b,d   Jinek, Martin ^c   McCammon, J Andrew ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhanced sampling; Free energy; Gene regulation; Protein nucleic acid interactions; RNA dynamics

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCELASE CAS9; ENDONUCLEASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GUIDE RNA; NUCLEIC ACID; PROTEIN; RNA;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA CLEAVAGE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME MECHANISM; GENE EDITING; GENETIC MANIPULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; SIMULATION; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METABOLISM; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES; THERMODYNAMICS; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GENE EDITING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PROTEIN DOMAINS; PROTEINS; RNA; RNA, GUIDE; STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 85023197915     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716079114     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Barrangou R, Doudna JA (2016) Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond. Nat Biotechnol 34: 933-941.
2. Doudna JA, Charpentier E (2014) Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346: 1258096.
3. Jinek M, et al. (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337: 816-821.
4. Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA (2014) DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507: 62-67.
5. Jiang F, Doudna JA (2017) CRISPR-Cas9 structures and mechanisms. Annu Rev Biophys 46: 505-529.
6. Jinek M, et al. (2014) Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 343: 1247997.
7. Jiang F, Zhou K, Ma L, Gressel S, Doudna JA (2015) Structural biology. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition. Science 348: 1477-1481.
8. Anders C, Niewoehner O, Duerst A, Jinek M (2014) Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513: 569-573.
9. Nishimasu H, et al. (2014) Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156: 935-949.
10. Jiang F, et al. (2016) Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage. Science 351: 867-871.
11. Sternberg SH, LaFrance B, Kaplan M, Doudna JA (2015) Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature 527: 110-113.
12. Dagdas YS, Chen JS, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA, Yildiz A (2017) A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. bioRxiv. doi: biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/122242.
13. Palermo G, Miao Y, Walker RC, Jinek M, McCammon JA (2016) Striking plasticity of CRISPR-Cas9 and key role of non-target DNA, as revealed by molecular simulations. ACS Cent Sci 2: 756-763.
14. Singh D, Sternberg SH, Fei J, Doudna JA, Ha T (2016) Real-time observation of DNA recognition and rejection by the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nat Commun 7: 12778.
15. Nguyen C, et al. (2014) Trapping the dynamic acyl carrier protein in fatty acid biosynthesis. Nature 505: 427-431.
16. Pierce LCT, Salomon-Ferrer R, Augusto F de Oliveira C, McCammon JA, Walker RC (2012) Routine access to millisecond time scale events with accelerated molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 2997-3002.
17. Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 9: 646-652.
18. Miao Y, Feher VA, McCammon JA (2015) Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation. J Chem Theory Comput 11: 3584-3595.
19. Miao Y, McCammon JA (2016) Graded activation and free energy landscapes of a muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 12162-12167.
20. Miao Y, McCammon JA (2016) Unconstrained enhanced sampling for free energy calculations of biomolecules: A review. Mol Simul 42: 1046-1055.
21. Wright AV, et al. (2015) Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 2984-2989.
22. Slaymaker IM, et al. (2016) Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351: 84-88.
23. Kleinstiver BP, et al. (2015) Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523: 481-485.
24. Zheng W (2017) Probing the structural dynamics of the CRISPR-Cas9 RNA-guided DNA-cleavage system by coarse-grained modeling. Proteins 85: 342-353.
25. Trzesniak D, Kunz AP, van Gunsteren WF (2007) A comparison of methods to compute the potential of mean force. ChemPhysChem 8: 162-169.
26. Biertümpfel C, Yang W, Suck D (2007) Crystal structure of T4 endonuclease VII resolving a Holliday junction. Nature 449: 616-620.
27. Steitz TA, Steitz JA (1993) A general two-metal-ion mechanism for catalytic RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 6498-6502.
28. Zuo Z, Liu J (2016) Cas9-catalyzed DNA cleavage generates staggered ends: Evidence from molecular dynamics simulations. Sci Rep 5: 37584.
29. De Vivo M, Dal Peraro M, Klein ML (2008) Phosphodiester cleavage in ribonuclease H occurs via an associative two-metal-aided catalytic mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 130: 10955-10962.
30. Casalino L, Palermo G, Abdurakhmonova N, Rothlisberger U, Magistrato A (2017) Development of site-specific Mg(2+)-RNA force field parameters: A dream or reality? Guidelines from combined molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 13: 340-352.
31. Palermo G, et al. (2015) Catalytic metal ions and enzymatic processing of DNA and RNA. Acc Chem Res 48: 220-228.
32. Pérez A, et al. (2007) Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: Improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. Biophys J 92: 3817-3829.
33. Banas P, et al. (2010) Performance of molecular mechanics force fields for RNA simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA hairpins. J Chem Theory Comput 6: 3836-3849.
34. Zgarbová M, et al. (2011) Refinement of the Cornell et al. nucleic acids force field based on reference quantum chemical calculations of glycosidic torsion profiles. J Chem Theory Comput 7: 2886-2902.
35. Aqvist J (1990) Ion-water interaction potentials derived from free energy perturbation simulations. J Phys Chem 94: 8021-8024.
36. Case DA, et al. (2016) AMBER 2016 (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA).
37. Phillips JC, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781-1802.