Misconceptions on missing data in RAD-seq phylogenetics with a deep-scale example from flowering plants

Systematic Biology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 399-412

  Eaton, Deren A R ^a   Spriggs, Elizabeth L ^a   Park, Brian ^a   Donoghue, Michael J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical redundancy; Phylogenetic informativeness; Quartet informativeness; Restriction site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing; Sequencing coverage; Viburnum

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNOLIOPSIDA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85019684655     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw092     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Avni E., Cohen R., Snir S. 2015. Weighted quartets phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 64:233-242.
2. Baird N. A., Etter P. D., Atwood T. S., Currey M. C., Shiver A. L., Lewis Z. A., Selker E. U., Cresko W. A., Johnson E. A. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3:e3376.
3. Baum D. A. 2007. Concordance trees, concordance factors, and the exploration of reticulate genealogy. Taxon 56:417-426.
4. Bayzid M. S., Mirarab S., Boussau B., Warnow T. 2015. Weighted statistical binning: enabling statistically consistent genome-scale phylogenetic analyses. PLoS ONE 10:e0129183.
5. Bennett M., Leitch I. 2012. Plant DNA C-values database (release 6.0, Dec. 2012). http://www.kew.org/cvalues/. (Accessed: 2015-09-30).
6. Berry V., Gascuel O. 2000. Inferring evolutionary trees with strong combinatorial evidence. Theoret. Computer Sci. 240:271-298.
7. Buerkle A. C., Gompert Z. 2013. Population genomics based on low coverage sequencing: how low should we go? Mol. Ecol. 22:3028-3035.
8. Cariou M., Duret L., Charlat S. 2013. Is RAD-seq suitable for phylogenetic inference? An in silico assessment and optimization. Ecol. Evol. 3:846-852.
9. Chifman J., Kubatko L. 2014. Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 30:3317-3324.
10. Clement W. L., Arakaki M., Sweeney P. W., Edwards E. J., Dnoghue M. J. 2014. A chloroplast tree for Viburnum (Adoxaceae) and its implications for phylogenetic classification and character evolution. Am. J. Botany 101:1029-1049.
11. Collins R. A., Hrbek T. 2015. An in silico comparison of reducedrepresentation and sequence-capture protocols for phylogenomics. bioRxiv, p. 032565.
12. DaCosta J. M., Sorenson M. D. 2016. ddRAD-seqphylogenetics basedon nucleotide, indel, and presence-absence polymorphisms: Analyses of two avian genera with contrasting histories. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 94:122-135.
13. Eaton D. A. R., Hipp A. L., González-Rodríguez A., Cavender-Bares J. 2015. Historical introgression among the American live oaks and the comparative nature of tests for introgression. Evolution 69:2587-2601.
14. Eaton D. A. R., Ree R. H. 2013. Inferring phylogeny and introgression using RADseq data: An example from flowering plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Syst. Biol. 62:689-706.
15. Eaton D. A. R. 2014. PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 30:1844-1849.
16. Escudero M., Eaton D. A., Hahn M., Hipp A. L. 2014. Genotyping-bysequencing as a tool to infer phylogeny and ancestral hybridization: A case study in carex (cyperaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 79:359-367.
17. Harvey M. G., Smith B. T., Glenn T. C., Faircloth B. C., Brumfield R. T. 2013. Sequence capture versus restriction site associated DNA sequencing for phylogeography. arXiv:1312.6439 [q-bio]. ArXiv: 1312.6439.
18. Herrera S., Watanabe H., Shank T. M. 2015. Evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of barnacles from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Mol. Ecol. 24:673-689.
19. Hipp A. L., Eaton D. A. R., Cavender-Bares J., Fitzek E., Nipper R., Manos P. S. 2014. A framework phylogeny of the American oak clade based on sequenced RAD data. PLoS ONE, 9:e93975.
20. Huang H., Knowles L. L. 2016. Unforeseen Consequences of Excluding Missing Data from Next-Generation Sequences: Simulation study of RAD Sequences. Syst. Biol. 65:357-365.
21. Jarvis E. D., Mirarab S., Aberer A. J., Li B., Houde P., Li C., Ho S. Y. W., Faircloth B. C., Nabholz B., Howard J. T., Suh A., Weber C. C., Fonseca R. R.d., Li J., Zhang F., Li H., Zhou L., Narula N., Liu L., Ganapathy G., Boussau B., Bayzid M. S., Zavidovych V., Subramanian S., Gabaldón T., Capella-Gutiérrez S., Huerta-Cepas J., Rekepalli B., Munch K., Schierup M., Lindow B., Warren W. C., Ray D., Green R. E., Bruford M. W., Zhan X., Dixon A., Li S., Li N., Huang Y., Derryberry E. P., Bertelsen M. F., Sheldon F. H., Brumfield R. T., Mello C. V., Lovell P. V., Wirthlin M., Schneider M. P. C., Prosdocimi F., Samaniego J. A., Velazquez A. M. V., Alfaro-Núñez A., Campos P. F., Petersen B., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Pas A., Bailey T., Scofield P., Bunce M., Lambert D. M., Zhou Q., Perelman P., Driskell A. C., Shapiro B., Xiong Z., Zeng Y., Liu S., Li Z., Liu B., Wu K., Xiao J., Yinqi X., Zheng Q., Zhang Y., Yang H., Wang J., Smeds L., Rheindt F. E., Braun M., Fjeldsa J., Orlando L., Barker F. K., Jønsson K. A., Johnson W., Koepfli K. P., O'Brien S., Haussler D., Ryder O. A., Rahbek C., Willerslev E., Graves G. R., Glenn T. C., Mc Cormack J., Burt D., Ellegren H., Alström P., Edwards S. V., Stamatakis A., Mindell D. P., Cracraft J., Braun E. L., Warnow T., Jun. W., Gilbert M. T. P., Zhang G. 2014. Wholegenome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346:1320-1331.
22. Kuhner M. K., Mc Gill J. 2014. Correcting for sequencing error in maximum likelihood phylogeny inference. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics 4:2545-2552.
23. Larget B. R., Kotha S. K., Dewey C. N., Ané C. 2010. BUCKy: Gene tree/species tree reconciliation with Bayesian concordance analysis. Bioinformatics 26:2910-2911.
24. Leaché A. D., Chavez A. S., Jones L. N., Grummer J. A., Gottscho A. D., Linkem C. W. 2015. Phylogenomics of phrynosomatid lizards: conflicting signals from sequence capture versus restriction site associated DNA sequencing. Genome Biol. Evol. 7:706-719.
25. Leaché A. D., Banbury B. L., Felsenstein J., nieto-Montes de Oca A., Stamatakis, A. 2015. Syst. Biol. 64:1032-1047.
26. Lemmon A. R., Emme S. A., Lemmon E. M. (2012). Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 61:727-744.
27. Li Y., Willer C., Sanna S., Abecasis G. (2009). Genotype Imputation. Ann. Rev. Genomics Human Genet 10:387-406.
28. Liu L., Xi Z., Wu S., Davis C. C., Edwards S. V. 2015. Estimating phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1360:36-53.
29. Liu L., Yu L., Edwards S. V. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:1-18.
30. Mc Cluskey B. M., Postlethwait J. H. (2015). Phylogeny of Zebrafish, a "Model Species", within Danio, a "Model Genus". Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:635-652.
31. Mc Cormack J. E., Faircloth B. C., Crawford N. G., Gowaty P. A., Brumfield R. T., Glenn T. C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species-tree analysis. Genome Res. 22:746-754.
32. Miller M. R., Dunham J. P., Amores A., Cresko W. A., Johnson E. A. 2007. Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res. 17:240-248.
33. Mirarab S., Bayzid M. S., Boussau B., Warnow T. 2014a. Statistical binning enablesanaccuratecoalescent-basedestimationoftheavian tree. Science 346 (6215).
34. Mirarab S., Reaz R., Bayzid M. S., Zimmermann T., Swenson M. S., Warnow T. 2014b. Astral: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 30:i541-i548.
35. Mita S. D., Siol M. 2012. EggLib: processing, analysis and simulation tools for population genetics and genomics. BMC Genetics 13:27.
36. Nadeau N. J., Martin S. H., Kozak K. M., Salazar C., Dasmahapatra K. K., Davey J. W., Baxter S. W., Blaxter M. L., Mallet J., Jiggins C. D. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22:814-826.
37. Peterson B. K., Weber J. N., Kay E. H., Fisher H. S., Hoekstra H. E. 2012. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PloS One 7:e37135.
38. Pinheiro J., Bates D., Deb Roy S., Sarkar D., R Core Team 2016. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3. 1-128.
39. Prum R. O., Berv J. S., Dornburg A., Field D. J., Townsend J. P., Lemmon E. M., Lemmon A. R. 2015. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526:569-573.
40. de Queiroz A., Gatesy J. 2007. The supermatrix approachtosystematics. Trend Ecol. Evol. 22:34-41.
41. Ree R. H., Hipp A. L. 2015. Inferring phylogenetic history from restriction site associated DNA (RADseq). In: (Hörandl E., AppelhansM., editors. Next-generation sequencing inplantsystematics, International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT), chap. 6.
42. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
43. Rubin B. E. R., Ree R. H., Moreau C. S. 2012. Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PLoS ONE 7:e33394.
44. Salichos L., Rokas A. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497:327-331.
45. Sanderson M. J., Mc Mahon M. M., Stamatakis A., Zwickl D. J., Steel M. 2015. Impacts of terraces on phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 64:709-726.
46. Sanderson M. J., Mc Mahon M. M., Steel M. 2011. Terraces in phylogenetic tree space. Science 333:448-450.
47. Sanderson M. J., Purvis A., Henze C. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trend Ecol. Evol. 13:105-109.
48. Spriggs E. L., Clement W. L., Sweeney P. W., Madriñán S., Edwards E. J., Donoghue M. J. 2015. Temperate radiations and dying embers of a tropical past: the diversification of Viburnum. New Phytologist. 207:340-354.
49. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312-1313.
50. Symonds M. R. E., Blomberg S. P. 2014. A primer on phylogenetic generalised least squares. In: Garamszegi L. Z., editor. Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, chap. 5, pp. 105-130.
51. Takahashi T., Moreno E. 2015. A RAD-based phylogenetics for Orestias fishes from Lake Titicaca. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 93:307-317.
52. Takahashi T., Nagata N., Sota T. 2014. Application of RAD-based phylogenetics to complex relationships among variously related taxa in a species flock. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 80:137-144.
53. Whidden C., Matsen F. A. 2015. Quantifying MCMC exploration of phylogenetic tree space. Syst. Biol. 64:472-491.
54. Wiens J. J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52:528-538.
55. Xi Z., Liu L., Davis C. C. 2015. Genes with minimal phylogenetic information are problematic for coalescent analyses when gene tree estimation is biased. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 92:63-71.