A framework phylogeny of the American oak clade based on sequenced RAD data

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Hipp, Andrew L ^a,b   Eaton, Deren A R ^b,c,g   Cavender Bares, Jeannine ^d   Fitzek, Elisabeth ^a   Nipper, Rick ^e   Manos, Paul S ^f  

^a MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e Floragenex   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; RESTRICTION SITE ASSOCIATED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; HOMOPLASY; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; NONHUMAN; OAK; PHYLOGENY; QUERCUS ARIZONICA; QUERCUS CHRYSOLEPIS; QUERCUS DOUGLASII; QUERCUS DURATA; QUERCUS ENGELMANII; QUERCUS HEMISPHAERICA; QUERCUS NIGRA; RESTRICTION SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; RESTRICTION MAPPING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NORTH AMERICA; PHYLOGENY; QUERCUS; RESTRICTION MAPPING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84899061444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093975     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Van Valen L (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233-239.
2. Kubatko LS (2009) Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection. Systematic Biology 58: 478-488.
3. Meng C, Kubatko LS (2009) Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: A model. Theoretical Population Biology 75: 35-45.
4. Huang H, He Q, Kubatko LS, Knowles LL (2010) Sources of Error Inherent in Species-Tree Estimation: Impact of Mutational and Coalescent Effects on Accuracy and Implications for Choosing among Different Methods. Systematic Biology 59: 573-583.
5. Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecology and Management 197: 323-335.
6. Savolainen O, Pyhajarvi T, Knurr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38: 595-619.
7. Hoban SM, McCleary TS, Schlarbaum SE, Romero-Severson J (2009) Geographically extensive hybridization between the forest trees American butternut and Japanese walnut. Biology Letters 5: 324-327.
8. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
9. Petit R, Bodenes C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A (2004) Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist 161: 151-164. (Pubitemid 38047056)
10. Burgarella C, Lorenzo Z, Jabbour-Zahab R, Lumaret R, Guichoux E, et al. (2009) Detection of hybrids in nature: application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity 102: 442-452.
11. Lepais O, Petit R, Guichoux E, Lavabre J, Alberto F, et al. (2009) Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Molecular Ecology 18: 2228-2242.
12. Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 386-393.
13. Lagache L, Klein EK, Guichoux E, Petit RJ (2013) Fine-scale environmental control of hybridization in oaks. Molecular Ecology 22: 423-436.
14. Burger WC (1975) The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
15. Lexer C, Kremer A, Petit RJ (2006) Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 15: 2007-2012. (Pubitemid 43725682)
16. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA (1991) Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 88: 2540-2544.
17. Dumolin-Lapegue S, Demesure B, Fineschi S, Come VL, Petit RJ (1997) Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent. Genetics 146: 1475-1487. (Pubitemid 27337689)
18. Hardin JW (1975) Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 56: 336-363.
19. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K (2004) Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. American Journal of Botany 91: 401-409. (Pubitemid 38370884)
20. Hipp AL, Weber JA (2008) Taxonomy of Hill's Oak (Quercus ellipsoidalis: Fagaceae): Evidence from AFLP Data. Systematic Botany 33: 148-158. (Pubitemid 351500249)
21. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C (2000) Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature (London) 405: 1016. (Pubitemid 30447777)
22. Cavender-Bares J, Pahlich A (2009) Molecular, morphological, and ecological niche differentiation of sympatric sister oak species, Quercus virginiana and Q. geminata (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1690-1702.
23. Aldrich PR, Cavender-Bares J (2011) Genomics and breeding of oaks and their slightly less-domesticated wild oak relatives. In: Kole C, editor. Wealth of Wild Species: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 89-130.
24. Manos PS, Doyle JJ, Nixon KC (1999) Phylogeny, Biogeography, and Processes of Molecular Differentiation in Quercus Subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 333-349. (Pubitemid 129499312)
25. Oh S-H, Manos PS (2008) Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences. Taxon 57: 434-451. (Pubitemid 351929778)
26. Kremer A, Abbott A, Carlson J, Manos P, Plomion C, et al. (2012) Genomics of Fagaceae. Tree Genetics & Genomes 8: 583-610.
27. Borgardt SJ, Pigg KB (1999) Anatomical and developmental study of petrified Quercus (Fagaceae) fruits from the Middle Miocene, Yakima Canyon, Washington, USA. American Journal of Botany 86: 307-325.
28. Daghlian CP, Crepet WL (1983) Oak catkins, leaves and fruits from the Oligocene Catahoula formation and their evolutionary significance. American Journal of Botany 70: 639-649. (Pubitemid 15271470)
29. Denk T, Grimm GW (2010) The oaks of western Eurasia: Traditional classifications and evidence from two nuclear markers. Taxon 59: 351-366.
30. Pearse IS, Hipp AL (2009) Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 18097-18102.
31. Felsenstein J (1992) Phylogenies from restriction sites: a maximum-likelihood approach. Evolution 46: 159-173.
32. Koopman WJM (2005) Phylogenetic Signal in AFLP Data Sets. Systematic Biology 54: 197-217.
33. Hipp AL, Rothrock PE, Reznicek AA, Berry PE (2007) Changes in chromosome number associated with speciation in sedges: A phylogenetic study in Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae) using AFLP data. Aliso 23: 193-203.
34. Luo R, Hipp AL, Larget B (2007) A Bayesian Model of AFLP Marker Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 6: Article 11 (pp. 11-30).
35. Luo R, Larget B (2009) Modeling substitution and indel processes for AFLP marker evolution and phylogenetic inference. Annals of Applied Statistics 3: 222-248.
36. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg NA, RoyChoudhury A (2012) Inferring Species Trees Directly from Biallelic Genetic Markers: Bypassing Gene Trees in a Full Coalescent Analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1917-1932.
37. Althoff DM, Gitzendanner MA, Segraves KA (2007) The Utility of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms in Phylogenetics: A Comparison of Homology within and between Genomes. Systematic Biology 56: 477-484.
38. Garcia-Pereira MJ, Caballero A, Quesada H (2010) Evaluating the Relationship between Evolutionary Divergence and Phylogenetic Accuracy in AFLP Data Sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 988-1000.
39. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, et al. (2008) Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers. PLoS ONE 3: e3376.
40. Lewis ZA, Shiver AL, Stiffler N, Miller MR, Johnson EA, et al. (2007) High-Density Detection of Restriction-Site-Associated DNA Markers for Rapid Mapping of Mutated Loci in Neurospora. Genetics 177: 1163-1171. (Pubitemid 350005663)
41. Miller M, Atwood T, Eames BF, Eberhart J, Yan Y-L, et al. (2007) RAD marker microarrays enable rapid mapping of zebrafish mutations. Genome Biology 8: R105.
42. Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2007) Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Research 17: 240-248. (Pubitemid 46220769)
43. Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM, Hohenlohe PA, Cresko WA, et al. (2010) Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 16196-16200.
44. Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Etter PD, Stiffler N, Johnson EA, et al. (2010) Population Genomics of Parallel Adaptation in Threespine Stickleback using Sequenced RAD Tags. PLoS Genet 6: e1000862.
45. Bruneaux M, Johnston SE, Herczeg G, Merilä J, Primmer CR, et al. (2013) Molecular evolutionary and population genomic analysis of the nine-spined stickleback using a modified restriction-site-associated DNA tag approach. Molecular Ecology 22: 565-582.
46. Wang N, Thomson M, Bodles WJA, Crawford RMM, Hunt HV, et al. (2013) Genome sequence of dwarf birch (Betula nana) and cross-species RAD markers. Molecular Ecology 22: 3098-3111.
47. Stölting KN, Nipper R, Lindtke D, Caseys C, Waeber S, et al. (2013) Genomic scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms reveals patterns of divergence and gene flow between ecologically divergent species. Molecular Ecology 22: 842-855.
48. Wagner CE, Keller I, Wittwer S, Selz OM, Mwaiko S, et al. (2013) Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Molecular Ecology 22: 787-798.
49. Rubin BER, Ree RH, Moreau CS (2012) Inferring Phylogenies from RAD Sequence Data. PLoS ONE 7: e33394.
50. Eaton DAR, Ree RH (2013) Inferring Phylogeny and Introgression using RADseq Data: An Example from Flowering Plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Systematic Biology 62: 689-706.
51. Gugger PF, Cavender-Bares J (2013) Molecular and morphological support for a Florida origin of the Cuban oak. Journal of Biogeography 40: 632-645.
52. Cock PJA, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM (2010) The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Research 38: 1767-1771.
53. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment. Genome Research 8: 175-185. (Pubitemid 28177229)
54. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. url: http://www.r-project.org. [Accessed March 2013]
55. Morgan M, Anders S, Lawrence M, Aboyoun P, Pagès H, et al. (2009) ShortRead: a bioconductor package for input, quality assessment and exploration of high-throughput sequence data. Bioinformatics 25: 2607-2608.
56. Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH (2011) Stacks: Building and Genotyping Loci De Novo From Short-Read Sequences. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 1: 171-182.
57. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460-2461.
58. Lynch M (2008) Estimation of Nucleotide Diversity, Disequilibrium Coefficients, and Mutation Rates from High-Coverage Genome-Sequencing Projects. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 2409-2419.
59. Dzialuk A, Chybicki I, Welc M, liwiska E, Burczyk J (2007) Presence of Triploids among Oak Species. Annals of Botany (London) 99: 959-964. (Pubitemid 47355859)
60. Aykut Y, Uslu E, Babaç MT (2011) Cytogenetic studies on Quercus L. (Fagaceae) species belonging to Ilex and Cerris section in Turkey. Caryologia 64: 297-301.
61. Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 44: 223-270.
62. Li W-H (1986) Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference. Genetics 113: 187-213.
63. Sober E (1991) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
64. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, et al. (2012) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-5.
65. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach: MjM Software Design.
66. Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N (2010) Time and memory efficient likelihood-based tree searches on phylogenomic alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics 26: i132-139.
67. Le Quesne WJ (1969) A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Systematic Zoology 18: 201-205.
68. Trueman JW (1998) Reverse successive weighting. Systematic Biology 47: 733-737.
69. Cook R (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear-regression. Technometrics 19: 15-18.
70. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg NA, RoyChoudhury A (2012) Inferring Species Trees Directly from Biallelic Genetic Markers: Bypassing Gene Trees in a Full Coalescent Analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1917-1932.
71. Ané C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A (2007) Bayesian Estimation of Concordance among Gene Trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 412-426. (Pubitemid 46204374)
72. Knowles LL, Kubatko L, editors (2010) Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell & Sons, Inc.
73. Hipp AL (2014) RADami: R Package for Phylogenetic Analysis of RADseq Data. R package version 1.0-3. url: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RADami.
74. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403-410.
75. Pages H, Aboyoun P, Gentleman R, DebRoy S (2013) Biostrings: String objects representing biological sequences, and matching algorithms, version 2.26.2. url: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.12/bioc/html/Biostrings. html. [Accessed June 2012]
76. Gentleman R, Carey V, Bates D, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 5: R80.
77. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, et al. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674-3676. (Pubitemid 41264107)
78. Aberer AJ, Krompass D, Stamatakis A (2013) Pruning Rogue Taxa Improves Phylogenetic Accuracy: An Efficient Algorithm and Webservice. Systematic Biology 62: 162-166.
79. Aberer AJ, Krompab D, Stamatakis A (2011) RogueNaRok: an Efficient and Exact Algorithm for Rogue Taxon Identification. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies: http://sco.h-its.org/exelixis/rrdr2011-10.php. [Accessed June 2012]
80. Manos PS, Fairbrothers DE (1987) Allozyme variation in populations of six northeastern American red oaks (Fagaceae: Quercus subg. Erythrobalanus). Systematic Botany 12: 265-373.
81. Wiens JJ (2003) Missing Data, Incomplete Taxa, and Phylogenetic Accuracy. Systematic Biology 52: 528-538.
82. Thomson RC, Shaffer HB (2010) Sparse Supermatrices for Phylogenetic Inference: Taxonomy, Alignment, Rogue Taxa, and the Phylogeny of Living Turtles. Systematic Biology 59: 42-58.