Correcting for sequencing error in maximum likelihood phylogeny inference

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2545-2552

  Kuhner, Mary K ^a   McGill, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Maximum likelihood; Phylogeny inference; Sequencing error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE SEQUENCE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD PHYLOGENY INFERENCE; SEQUENCING ERROR CORRECTION; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84964312527     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.014365     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cornish-Bowden, A., 1985 Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences: recommendations 1984. Nucleic Acids Res. 13: 3021-3030.
2. de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier, 1990 Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Biol. 39: 307-322.
3. Drummond, A. J., S. Y. W. Ho, M. J. Phillips, and A. Rambaut, 2006 Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4: e88.
4. Ewing, B., and P. Green, 1998 Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8: 186-194.
5. Felsenstein, J., 1981 Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368-376.
6. Felsenstein, J., 2004 Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,MA.
7. Felsenstein, J., 2005 PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
8. Glenn, T. C., 2014. 2014 NGS Field Guide. Available at: www.molecularecologist.com/next-gen-table-3c-2014/. Accessed: October 27, 2014.
9. Haiminen, N., D. N. Kuhn, L. Parida, and I. Rigoutsos, 2011 Evaluation of methods for de novo genome assembly from high-throughput sequencing reads reveals dependencies that affect the quality of the results. PLoS One 9: e24182.
10. Kuhner, M. K., 2009 Coalescent genealogy samplers: windows into population history. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 86-93.
11. Kuhner, M. K., and J. Yamato, 2014 Practical performance of tree comparison metrics. Sys Biol doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu085.
12. Machado, C. A., N. Robbins, M. T. P. Gilbert, and E. A. Herre, 2005 Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig wasp mutualism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(Suppl 1): 6558-6565.
13. McGill, J. R., E. A. Walkup, and M. K. Kuhner, 2013 Correcting coalescent analyses for panel-based SNP ascertainment. Genetics 193: 1185-1196.
14. Robinson, D. F., and L. R. Foulds, 1979 Comparison of weighted labeled trees. Lecture Notes Mathematics 748: 119-126.
15. Robinson, D. F., and L. R. Foulds, 1981 Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53: 131-147.
16. Rutschmann, F., 2006 Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees: a brief review of current methods that estimate divergence times. Divers. Distrib. 12: 35-48.