Phylogenomics of phrynosomatid lizards: Conflicting signals from sequence capture versus restriction site associated DNA sequencing

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 706-719

  Leaché, Adam D ^a,b   Chavez, Andreas S ^a,b,e   Jones, Leonard N ^a,b   Grummer, Jared A ^a,b   Gottscho, Andrew D ^c,d   Linkem, Charles W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Departmentof Mammalogy and Paleontology Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescence; ddRADseq; Incomplete lineage sorting; RADseq; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Species tree; Ultraconserved elements

Indexed keywords

RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE;

ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; LIZARD; PHYLOGENY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; DNA RESTRICTION ENZYMES; GENOMICS; LIZARDS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84936771254     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv026     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alföldi J, et al. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587-591.
2. Andrews KR, et al. 2014. Trade-offs and utility of alternative RADseq methods. Mol Ecol. 23:5943-5946.
3. Arnold B, Corbett-Detig RB, Hartl D, Bomblies K. 2013. RADseq underestimates diversity and introduces genealogical biases due to nonrandom haplotype sampling. Mol Ecol. 22:3179-3190.
4. Baele G, et al. 2012. Improving the accuracy of demographic and molecular clock model comparison while accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2157-2167.
5. Baele G, Li WLS, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Lemey P. 2013. Accurate model selection of relaxed molecular clocks in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 30:239-243.
6. Baird NA, et al. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376.
7. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114-2120.
8. Cariou M, Duret L, Charlat S. 2013. Is RAD-seq suitable for phylogenetic inference? An in silico assessment and optimization. Ecol Evol. 3:846-852.
9. Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA. 2013. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol. 22:3124-3140.
10. Chifman J, Kubatko L. 2014. Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 30:3317-3324.
11. Crawford NG, et al. 2012. More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biol Lett. 8:783-786.
12. Cruaud A, et al. 2014. Empirical assessment of RAD sequencing for interspecific phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 31:1272-1274.
13. Davey JW, Blaxter ML. 2010. RADSeq: next-generation population genetics. Brief Funct Genomics. 9:416-423.
14. Davey JW, et al. 2011. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 12:499-510.
15. De Queiroz K. 1989. Morphological and biochemical evolution in the sand lizards [PhD dissertation]. [Berkeley (CA)]: University of California, Berkeley.
16. De Queiroz K. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships and rates of allozyme evolution among the lineages of sceloporine sand lizards. Biol J Linn Soc. 45:333-362.
17. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:e68.
18. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:332-340.
19. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1969-1973.
20. Eaton DAR. 2014. PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 30:1844-1849.
21. Eaton DAR, Ree RH. 2013. Inferring phylogeny and introgression using RADseq data: an example from flowering plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Syst Biol. 62:689-706.
22. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
23. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460-2461.
24. Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM, Hohenlohe PA, Cresko WA, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM. 2010. Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:16196-16200.
25. Faircloth BC, McCormack JE, Crawford NG, Harvey MG, Brumfield RT, Glenn TC. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst Biol. 61:717-726.
26. Gnirke A, et al. 2009. Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 27:182-189.
27. Genomic Resources Development Consortium, et al. 2015. Genomic resources notes accepted 1 August 2014-30 September 2014. Mol Ecol Resour. 15:228-229.
28. Harvey MG, Smith BT, Glenn TC, Faircloth BC, Brumfield RT. 2013. Sequence capture versus restriction site associated DNA sequencing for phylogeography. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6439.
29. Huang H, Knowles LL. 2014. Unforeseen consequences of excluding missing data from next-generation sequences: simulation study of RAD sequences. Syst Biol., Advance Access published July 4, 2014, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu046.
30. Ilut DC, Nydam ML, Hare MP. 2014. Defining loci in restriction-based reduced representation genomic data from nonmodel species: sources of bias and diagnostics for optimal clustering. BioMed Res Int. 2014:675158.
31. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772-780.
32. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst Biol. 56:17-24.
33. Lambert SM, Wiens JJ. 2013. Evolution of viviparity: a phylogenetic test of the cold-climate hypothesis in phrynosomatid lizards. Evolution 67:2614-2630.
34. Leaché AD, et al. 2014. A hybrid phylogenetic-phylogenomic approach for species tree estimation in African Agama lizards with applications to biogeography, character evolution, and diversification. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 79:215-230.
35. Leaché AD, McGuire JA. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of horned lizards (Phrynosoma) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data: evidence for a misleading mitochondrial gene tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 39:628-644.
36. Leaché AD, Rannala B. 2011. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Syst Biol. 60:126-137.
37. Lemmon AR, Emme S, Lemmon EM. 2012. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 61:727-744.
38. Li C, Hofreiter M, Straube N, Corrigan S, Naylor GJP. 2013. Capturing protein-coding genes across highly divergent species. Biotechniques 54:321-326.
39. Liu L, Edwards SV. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Syst Biol. 58:452-460.
40. Liu L, Yu L, Edwards SV. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol Biol. 10:302.
41. MacManes M. 2013. MacManes salt extraction protocol. Figshare. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.658946.
42. Mamanova L, et al. 2010. Target-enrichment strategies for nextgeneration sequencing. Nat Methods. 7:111-118.
43. McCormack JE, et al. 2012. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species-tree analysis. Genome Res. 22:746-754.
44. McCormack JE, et al. 2013. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1, 500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8:e54848.
45. Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. 2007. Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res. 17:240-248.
46. Ng SB, et al. 2009. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature 461:272-276.
47. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. 2010. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 17:337-354.
48. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. 2010. IDBA-a practical iterative de Bruijn graph de novo assembler. Res Comput Mol Biol. 6044:426-440.
49. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2012. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7:e37135.
50. Puritz JB, et al. 2014. Demystifying the RAD fad. Mol Ecol. 23:5937-5942.
51. Pyron RA, et al. 2014. Effectiveness of phylogenomic data and coalescent species-tree methods for resolving difficult nodes in the phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes: Caenophidia). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 81:221-231.
52. Rannala B, Yang Z. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
53. Reeder TW. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships among phyrynosomatid lizards as inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences: substitutional bias and information content of transitions relative to transversions. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 4:203-222.
54. Reeder TW, Wiens JJ. 1996. Evolution of the lizard family Phrynosomatidae as inferred from diverse types of data. Herpetol Monogr. 10:43-84.
55. Rheindt FE, Fujita MK, Wilton PR, Edwards SV. 2014. Introgression and phenotypic assimilation in Zimmerius flycatchers (Tyrannidae): population genetic and phylogenetic inferences from genome-wide SNPs. Syst Biol. 63:134-152.
56. Ronquist F, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61:539-542.
57. Rubin BER, Ree RH, Moreau CS. 2012. Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PLoS One 7:e33394.
58. Sinervo B, Lively CM. 1996. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380:240-243.
59. Smith BT, Harvey MG, Faircloth BC, Glenn TC, Brumfield RT. 2014. Target capture and massively parallel sequencing of ultraconserved elements for comparative studies at shallow evolutionary time scales. Syst Biol. 63:83-95.
60. Snir S, Rao S. 2012. Quartet MaxCut: a fast algorithm for amalgamating quartet trees. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 62:1-8.
61. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312-1313.
62. Sukumaran J, Holder MT. 2010. Dendropy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26:1569-1571.
63. ∗and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
64. Uetz P. 2014. The Reptile Database. Available from: http://wwwreptiledatabase.org.
65. Wagner CE, et al. 2013. Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Mol Ecol. 22:787-798.
66. Wiens JJ, et al. 2012. Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biol Lett. 8:1043-1046.
67. Wiens JJ, Kozak KH, Silva N. 2013. Diversity and niche evolution along aridity gradients in North American lizards (Phrynosomatidae). Evolution 67:1715-1728.
68. Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Arif S, Reeder TW. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships of phrynosomatid lizards based on nuclear and mitochondrial data, and a revised phylogeny for Sceloporus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 54:150-161.
69. Wilgenbusch J, De Queiroz K. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the phrynosomatid sand lizards inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences generated by heterogeneous evolutionary processes. Syst Biol. 49:592-612.
70. Yang Z, Rannala B. 2014. Unguided species delimitation using DNA sequence data from multiple loci. Mol Biol Evol. 31:3125-3135.