Unforeseen consequences of excluding missing data from next-generation sequences: Simulation study of rad sequences

Systematic Biology

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 357-365

  Huang, Huateng ^a   Lacey Knowles, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Next generation sequencing; Phylogenetic; Phylogeography; RADseq; RADtags; Species delimitation

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOME; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

BASE SEQUENCE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84978916740     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syu046     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnold B., Corbett-Detig R.B., Hartl D., Bomblies K. 2013. RADseq underestimates diversity and introduces genealogical biases due to nonrandom haplotype sampling. Mol. Ecol. 22:3179-3190.
2. Baird N.A., Etter P.D., Atwood T.S., Currey M.C., Shiver A.L., Lewis Z.A., Selker E.U., Cresko W.A., Johnson E.A. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376.
3. Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Gittleman J.L., Steel M.A. 2002. The (Super)tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:265-289.
4. Buerkle C.A., Gompert Z. 2013. Population genomics based on low coverage sequencing: how low should we go? Mol. Ecol. 22:3028-3035.
5. Catchen J.M., Amores A., Hohenlohe P., Cresko W., Postlethwait J.H. 2011. Stacks: building and genotyping loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 1:171-182.
6. Cummings M.P., Otto S.P., Wakeley J. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:814-822.
7. Eaton D.A.R., Ree R.H. 2013. Inferring phylogeny and introgression using RADseq data: An example from flowering plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Syst. Biol. 62:689-706.
8. Emerson K.J., Merz C.R., Catchen J.M., Hohenlohe P.A., Cresko W.A., Bradshaw W.E., Holzapfel C.M. 2010. Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-Throughput sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:16196-16200.
9. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61:717-726.
10. Fulton T.L., Strobeck C. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Arctoidea (Carnivora): effect of missing data on supertree and supermatrix analyses of multiple gene data sets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 41:165-181.
11. Huang H., He Q., Kubatko L.S., Knowles L.L. 2010. Sources of error for species-Tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on acuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst. Biol. 59:573-583.
12. Heled J., DrummondA.J. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:570-580.
13. Hird S.M., Brumfield R.T., Carstens B.C. 2011. PRGMATIC: An efficient pipeline for collating genome-enriched second-generation sequencing data using a provisional-reference genome. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11:743-748.
14. Hovmöller R., Knowles L.L., Kubatko L.S. 2013. Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69:1057-1062.
15. Hudson R.R. 2002. Generating samples under a wright-fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
16. Knowles L.L., Lanier H., Klimov P.B., He Q. 2012. Full modeling versus summarizing gene-Tree uncertainty:method choice and species-Tree accuracy. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 65:501-509.
17. Langmead B., Trapnell C., Pop M., Salzberg S.L. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
18. Lemmon A.R., Emme S.A., Lemmon E.M. 2012. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-Throughput phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 61:727-744.
19. Maddison W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
20. Maddison W.P., Knowles L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
21. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. 2011. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75 http://mesquiteproject.org.
22. McCormack J.E., Maley J.M., Hird S.M., Derryberry E.P., Graves G.R., Brumfield R.T. 2012. Next-generation sequencing reveals phylogeographic structure and a species tree for recent bird divergences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 62:397-406.
23. Nielsen R., Paul J.S., Albrechtsen A., Song Y.S. 2011. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data.Nat. Rev. Genet. 12:443-451.
24. Pamilo P., Ne M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-583.
25. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-gen: An application for the monte carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
26. Reyna-Lopez G.E., Simpson J., Ruiz-Herrera J. 1997. Differences inDNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification of restriction polymorphisms. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253:703-710.
27. Robinson D.F., Foulds L.R. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53:131-147.
28. Roure B., Baurain D., Philippe H. 2013. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:197-214.
29. Rubin B.E., Ree R.H., Moreau C.S. 2012. Inferring phylogenies from RAD sequence data. PLoS One 7:e33394.
30. Smith B.T., Harvey M.G., Faircloth B.C., Glenn T.C., Brumfield R.T. 2014. Target capture and massivel parallel sequencing of ultraconserved elements for comparative studies at shallow evolutionary time scales. Syst. Biol. 63:83-95.
31. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 57: 758-771.
32. Takahata N. 1989. Gene genealogy in 3 related populations-consistency probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122:957-966.
33. Taylor D.J., Piel W.H. 2004. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data (Vol. 21, p. 1534, 2004). Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1812-1812.
34. Wagner C.E., Keller I., Wittwer S., Selz O.M., Mwaiko S., Greuter L., Sivasundar A., Seehausen O. 2013. Genome-wide RAD sequence data provide unprecedented resolution of species boundaries and relationships in the Lake Victoria cichlid adaptive radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22:787-798.
35. Wang X.Q., Zhao L., Eaton D.A., Li D.Z., Guo Z.H. 2013. Identification of SNP markers for inferring phylogeny in temperate bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) usingRADsequencing. Mol. Ecol.Resour. 13:938-945.
36. Wiens J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52:528-538.
37. Wiens J.J. 2006. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inform. 39:34-42.
38. Wilkinson M. 1995. Coping with missing entries in phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 44:501-514.
39. Yu Y., Warnow T., Nakhleh L. 2011. Algorithms for MDC-based multilocus phylogeny inference: beyond rooted binary gene trees on single alleles. J. Comput. Biol. 18:1543-1559.
40. Zellmer A.J., Hanes M.M., Hird S.M., Carstens B.C. 2012. Deep phylogeographic structure and environmental differentiation in the carnivorous plant Sarracenia alata. Syst. Biol. 61:763-777.