A primer on phylogenetic generalised least squares

Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and their Application in Evolutionary Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 105-130

  Symonds, Matthew R E ^a   Blomberg, Simon P ^b  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916221886     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Abouheif E (1998) Random trees and the comparative method: a cautionary tale. Evolution 52:1197-1204
2. Abouheif E (1999) A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol Ecol Res 1:895-909
3. Bates D (2000) fortunes: R fortunes. R package version 1.5-0, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fortunes
4. Bininda-Emonds ORP (ed) (2004) Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
5. Björklund M (1997) Are ‘comparative methods’ always necessary? Oikos 80:607-612
6. Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr (2002) Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J Evol Biol 15:899-910
7. Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745
8. Blomberg SP, Lefevre JG, Wells JA, Waterhouse M (2012) Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent. Syst Biol 61:382-391
9. Bonduriansky R (2007) Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61:838-849
10. Butler MA, King AA (2004) Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modelling approach for adaptive evolution. Am Nat 164:683-695
11. Crane J (1975) Fiddler crabs of the Wworld: ocypodidae: genus Uca. Princeton University Press, Princeton
12. De Villemereuil P, Wells JA, Edwards RD, Blomberg SP (2012) Bayesian models for comparative analysis integrating phylogenetic uncertainty. BMC Evol Biol 12:102
13. Daz-Uriarte R, Garland T Jr (1998) Effects of branch lengths errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 47:654-672
14. Felsenstein J (1973) Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am J Human Genet 25:471-492
15. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1-15
16. Freckleton RP (2009) The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1367-1375
17. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712-726
18. Fritz SA, Purvis A (2010) Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conserv Biol 24:1042-1051
19. Garamszegi LZ, M0ller AP (2010) Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. Biol Rev 85:797-805
20. Garamszegi LZ, Calhim S, Dochtermann N, Hegyi G, Hurd PL, J0rgensen C, Kutsukake N, Lajeunesse MJ, Pollard KA, Schielzeth H, Symonds MRE, Nakagawa S (2009) Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology. Behav Ecol 20:1363-1375
21. Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2000) Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155:346-364
22. Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18-32
23. Gittleman JL, Kot M (1990) Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst Zool 39:227-241
24. Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Phil Trans R Soc B 326:119-157
25. Grafen A (2014) phyreg: Implements the phylogenetic regression of Grafen (1989). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/phyreg/index.html
26. Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351
27. Hansen TF, Pienaar J, Orzack SH (2008) A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment. Evolution 62:1965-1977
28. Harvey PH (1991) Comparing uncertain relationships: the Swedes in revolt. Trends Ecol Evol 6:38-39
29. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
30. Huey RB (1987) Phylogeny, history and the comparative method. In: Feder ME, Bennett AF, Burggren WW, Huey RB (eds) New directions in ecological physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 76-101
31. Ives AR, Garland T Jr (2010) Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst Biol 59:9-26
32. Ives AR, Midford PE, Garland T Jr (2007) Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst Biol 56:252-270
33. Kamilar JM, Cooper N (2013) Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120341
34. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463-1464
35. Lumley T (2009) fortunes: R fortunes. R package version 1.5-0, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fortunes
36. Losos JB (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am Nat 177:709-727
37. Maddison DR, Swofford DL, Maddison WP (1997) Nexus: an extensible file format for systematic information. Syst Biol 46:590-621
38. Maddison WP (1990) A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic trees? Evolution 44:539-557
39. Maddison WP (2000) Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J Theor Biol 202:195-204
40. Martins EP (2004) COMPARE. Version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington. http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/
41. Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149:646-667
42. Martins EP, Housworth EA (2002) Phylogeny shape and the phylogenetic comparative method. Syst Biol 51:873-880
43. Menard S (2000) Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. Am Stat 54(1):17-24
44. Münkemüller T, Lavergne S, Bzeznik B, Dray S, Jombart T, Schiffers K, Thuiller W (2012) How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol Evol 3:743-756
45. Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S, Isaac N, Pearse W (2012) caper: comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caper
46. Pagel MD (1992) A method for the analysis of comparative data. J Theor Biol 156:431-442
47. Pagel M (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc R Soc B 255:37-45
48. Pagel M (1997) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool Scripta 26:331-348
49. Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884
50. Pagel M, Meade A (2013) BayesTraits version 2.0 (Beta). University of Reading. http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk/BayesTraits.html
51. Paradis E, Claude J (2002) Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J Theor Biol 218:175-185
52. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290
53. Pearse WD, Purvis A (2013) phyloGenerator: an automated phylogeny generation tool for ecologists. Methods Ecol Evol 4:692-698
54. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixes-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, Berlin
55. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarker D, R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-111. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html
56. Promislow DEL, Harvey PH (1990) Living fast and dying young: a comparative analysis of life-history variation among mammals. J Zool 220:417-437
57. Purvis A, Garland T Jr (1993) Polytomies in comparative analysis of continuous characters. Syst Biol 42:569-575
58. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Luh H-K (1994) Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J Theor Biol 167:293-300
59. Revell LJ (2010) Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods Ecol Evol 1:319-329
60. Revell LJ (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217-223
61. Revell LJ, Reynolds RG (2012) A new Bayesian method for fitting evolutionary models to comparative data with intraspecific variation. Evolution 66:2697-2707
62. Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Collar DC (2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process and rate. Syst Biol 57:591-601
63. Rheindt FE, Grafe TU, Abouheif E (2004) Rapidly evolving traits and the comparative method: how important is testing for phylogenetic signal? Evol Ecol Res 6:377-396
64. Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
65. Rohlf FJ (2001) Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160
66. Rosenberg MS (2001) The systematics and taxonomy of fiddler crabs: a phylogeny of the genus Uca. J Crust Biol 21:839-869
67. Rosenberg MS (2002) Fiddler crab claw shape variation: a geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Biol J Linn Soc 75:147-162
68. Stone EA (2011) Why the phylogenetic regression appears robust to tree misspecification. Syst Biol 60:245-260
69. Symonds MRE (2002) The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts. Syst Biol 51:541-553
70. Symonds MRE, Elgar MA (2002) Phylogeny affects estimation of metabolic scaling in mammals. Evolution 56:2330-2333
71. Westoby M, Leishman MR, Lord JM (1995) On misinterpreting the ‘phylogenetic correction’. J Ecol 83:531-534