Historical introgression among the American live oaks and the comparative nature of tests for introgression

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2587-2601

  Eaton, Deren A R ^a   Hipp, Andrew L ^b,c   González Rodríguez, Antonio ^d   Cavender Bares, Jeannine ^e  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^c FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^d INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES EN ECOSISTEMAS Y SUSTENTABILIDAD   (Mexico)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Admixture; Cuba; Hybridization; Phylogeny; Quercus; RADseq

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TREE; GENETIC MARKER; HISTORICAL RECORD; HOME RANGE; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

CUBA;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS VIRGINIANA;

GENETICS; GULF OF MEXICO; HYBRIDIZATION; OAK; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION GENETICS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, PLANT; GULF OF MEXICO; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUERCUS;

EID: 84944157638     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12758     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Avise, J. C. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Baird, N. A., Etter P.D., Atwood T.S., Currey M.C., Shiver A.L., Lewis Z.A., Selker E.U., Cresko W.A., and Johnson E.A. 2008. Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers. PLoS ONE 3:7.
3. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
4. Boettiger, C., G. Coop, and P. Ralph. 2012. Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods. Evolution 66:2240-2251.
5. Borgardt, S. J., and K. B. Pigg. 1999. Anatomical and developmental study of petrified Quercus Fagaceae) fruits from the middle Miocene, Yakima Canyon, Washington, USA. Am. J. Bot. 86:307-325.
6. Burger, W. C. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24:45-50.
7. Cahill, J. A. et al. 2013. Genomic evidence for island population conversion resolves conflicting theories of polar bear evolution. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003345.
8. Cavender-Bares, J., and A. Pahlich. 2009. Molecular, morphological, and ecological niche differentiation of sympatric sister oak species, Quercus virginiana and Q. geminata (Fagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 96:1690-1702.
9. Cavender-Bares, J., A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A. Pahlich, K. Koehler, and N. Deacon. 2011. Phylogeography and climatic niche evolution in live oaks (Quercus series Virentes) from the tropics to the temperate zone. J. Biogeogr. 38:962-981.
10. Cavender-Bares, J., A. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, D. A. Eaton, A. A. L. Hipp, A. Beulke, and P. S. Manos. 2015. Phylogeny and biogeography of the American live oaks Quercus subsection Virentes): a genomic and population genetics approach. Mol. Ecol. 24:3668-3687.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. W.H. Freeman, Sunderland, MA.
12. Dumolin-Lapegue, S., A. Kremer, and R. J. Petit. 1999. Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution 53:1406-1413.
13. Durand, E. Y., N. Patterson, D. Reich, and M. Slatkin. 2011. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2239-2252.
14. Earl, D. A., and B. M. vonHoldt. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4:359-361.
15. Eaton, D. A. R. 2014. PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 30:1844-1849.
16. Eaton, D. A. R., and R. H. Ree. 2013. Inferring phylogeny and introgression using RADseq data: an example from flowering plants (Pedicularis: Orobanchaceae). Syst. Biol. 62:689-706.
17. Green, R. E., et al. 2010. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328:710-722.
18. Gugger, P. F., and J. Cavender-Bares. 2013. Molecular and morphological support for a Florida origin of the Cuban oak. J. Biogeogr. 40:632-645.
19. Gutenkunst, R. N., R. D. Hernandez, S. H. Williamson, and C. D. Bustamante. 2009. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000695.
20. Hardin, J. W. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J. Arnold Arbor. 56:336-363.
21. Harrison, R. G., and E. L. Larson. 2014. Hybridization, introgression, and the nature of species boundaries. J. Hered. 105:795-809.
22. Hipp, A. L., D. A. R. Eaton, J. Cavender-Bares, E. Fitzek, R. Nipper, and P. S. Manos. 2014. A framework phylogeny of the American oak clade based on sequenced RAD data. PLoS ONE 9:e93975.
23. Hudson, R. R. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
24. Jakobsson, M., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801-1806.
25. Kane, N. C., M. G. King, M. S. Barker, A. Raduski, S. Karrenberg, Y. Yatabe, S. J. Knapp, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2009. Comparative genomic and population genetic analyses indicate highly porous genomes and high levels of gene flow between divergent Helianthus species. Evolution 63:2061-2075.
26. Koehler, K., A. Center, and J. Cavender-Bares. 2012. Evidence for a freezing tolerance-growth rate trade-off in the live oaks (Quercus series Virentes) across the tropical-temperate divide. New Phytol. 193:730-744.
27. Kurz, H., and R. K. Godfrey. 1962. Trees of Northern Florida. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL.
28. Leaché, A. D., R. B. Harris, B. Rannala, and Z. Yang. 2014. The influence of gene flow on species tree estimation: a simulation study. Syst. Biol. 63:17-30.
29. Maddison, W. P., and L. L. Knowles. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
30. Muller, C. H. 1961. The live oaks of the series Virentes. Am. Midl. Nat. 65:17-39.
31. Nadeau, N. J. et al. 2013. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22:814-826.
32. Nixon, K., and C. Muller. 1997. Quercus Linnaeus sect. Quercus white oaks. Pp. 436-506 in Flora of North America Editorial Committee, ed.: Flora of North America North of Mexico. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
33. Nixon, K. C. 1985. A biosystematic study of Quercus series Virentes (the live oaks) with phylogenetic analyses of Fagales, Fagaceae and Quercus, Ph.D. Thesis. University of Texas, Austin.
34. Nosil, P. 2012. Ecological speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.; New York.
35. Pearse, I. S., and A. L. Hipp. 2009. Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:18097-18102.
36. Pelletier, T. A., and B. C. Carstens. 2014. Model choice for phylogeographic inference using a large set of models. Mol. Ecol. 23:3028-3043.
37. Pérez, F., and B. E. Granger. 2007. IPython: a system for interactive scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9:21-29.
38. Petit, R. J., and L. Excoffier. 2009. Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:386-393.
39. Petit, R. J., C. Bodénès, A. Ducousso, G. Roussel, and A. Kremer. 2004. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol. 161:151-164.
40. Petit, R. J. et al. 1997. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:9996-10001.
41. Pickrell, J. K., and J. K. Pritchard. 2012. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002967.
42. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
43. Rabosky, D. L., and D. R. Matute. 2013. Macroevolutionary speciation rates are decoupled from the evolution of intrinsic reproductive isolation in Drosophila and birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:15354-15359.
44. Ramírez-Valiente J.A., Koehler K., and Cavender-Bares J. 2015. Climatic origins predict variation in photoprotective leaf pigments in response to drought and low temperatures in live oaks (Quercus series Virentes). Tree Physiology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv03.
45. Rhymer, J. M., and D. Simberloff. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:83-109.
46. Rogers, A. R., and R. J. Bohlender. 2015. Bias in estimators of archaic admixture. Theor. Popul. Biol. 100:63-78.
47. Schumer, M., G. G. Rosenthal, and P. Andolfatto. 2014. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation? Evolution 68:1553-1560.
48. Stamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312-1313.
49. The Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487:94-98.
50. Tuskan, G. A. et al. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. and Gray). Science 313:1596-1604.
51. Van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233-239.
52. Whittemore, A. T., and B. A. Schaal. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:2540-2544.
53. Wu, C. I. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851-865.