Comparison of static and dynamic sensory product characterizations based on check-all-that-apply questions with consumers

Food Research International

Volumn 97, Issue , 2017, Pages 215-222

  Alcaire, Florencia ^a   Antúnez, Lucía ^a   Vidal, Leticia ^a   Zorn, Shari ^a   Giménez, Ana ^a   Castura, John C ^b   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b Compusense Inc ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Check all that apply questions; Consumers; Sensory characterization; Temporal CATA; Temporal methods

Indexed keywords

FOOD PRODUCTS; FRUIT JUICES;

CHECK-ALL-THAT-APPLY QUESTIONS; CONSUMERS; SENSORY CHARACTERIZATION; TEMPORAL CATA; TEMPORAL METHODS;

CHARACTERIZATION;

ADULT; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85018463150     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: 18737145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alcaire, F., Zorn, S., Cadena, R.S., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Application of survival analysis to estimate equivalent sweet concentration of low-calorie sweeteners in orange juice. Journal of Sensory Studies 29 (2014), 474–479.
2. Ares, G., Methodological challenges in sensory characterization. Current Opinion in Food Science 3 (2015), 1–5.
3. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice. Experimental considerations and impact on outcome. Delarue, J., Lawlor, J.B., Rogeaux, M., (eds.) Rapid sensory profiling techniques and related methods, 2015, Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge, 227–245.
4. Ares, G., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Roigard, C.M., Pineau, B., Hunter, D.C., Jaeger, S.R., Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 36 (2014), 111–121.
5. Ares, G., Antúnez, L., Bruzzone, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Pineau, B., Jaeger, S.R., Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples. Food Quality and Preference 45 (2015), 75–86.
6. Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B., Castura, J.C., Comparison of TCATA and TDS for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Research International 78 (2015), 148–158.
7. Ares, G., Castura, J.C., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B., Jaeger, S.R., Comparison of two TCATA variants for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Quality and Preference 54 (2016), 160–172.
8. Baker, A.K., Castura, J.C., Ross, C.F., Temporal check-all-that-apply characterization of Syrah wine finish. Journal of Food Science 81 (2016), S1521–S1529.
9. Bruzzone, F., Ares, G., Giménez, A., Temporal aspects of yoghurt perception. International Dairy Journal 29 (2013), 124–134.
10. Cadoret, M., Husson, F., Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 106–115.
11. Castura, J.C., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference 47 (2016), 79–90.
12. Cliff, M., Heymann, H., Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation – A review. Food Research International 26 (1993), 375–385.
13. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2016, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
14. Devezeaux de Lavergne, M., van Delft, M., van de Velde, F., van Boekel, M.A.J.S., Stieger, M., Dynamic texture perception and oral processing of semi-solid food gels: Part 1: Comparison between QDA, progressive profiling and TDS. Food Hydrocolloids 43 (2015), 207–217.
15. Dijksterhuis, G.B., Piggott, J.R., Dynamic methods of sensory analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology 11:8 (2000), 284–290.
16. Foster, K.D., Grigor, J.M.V., Cheong, J.N., Yoo, M.J.Y., Bronlund, J.E., Morgenstern, M.P., The role of oral processing in dynamic sensory perception. Journal of Food Science 76 (2011), R49–R61.
17. Guinard, J.X., Pangborn, R.M., Lewis, M.J., The time-course of astringency in wine upon repeated ingestion. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 37 (1986), 184–189.
18. Henrique, N.A., Deliza, R., Rosenthal, A., Consumer sensory characterization of cooked ham using the check-all-that-apply (CATA) methodology. Food Engineering Reviews 7 (2015), 265–273.
19. ISO, Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO standard 8589. 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Jack, F.R., Piggott, J.R., Paterson, A., Analysis of textural changes in hard cheeses during mastication by progressive profiling. Journal of Food Science 59 (1994), 539–543.
21. Jaeger, S.R., Cadena, R.S., Torres-Moreno, M., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation. Food Quality and Preference 35 (2014), 32–40.
22. Janssen, A.M., Terpstra, M.E.J., de Wijk, R.A., Prinz, J.F., Relations between rheological properties, saliva-induced structure breakdown and sensory texture attributes of custards. Journal of Texture Studies 38 (2007), 42–69.
23. Labbe, D., Schlich, P., Pineau, N., Gilbert, F., Martin, N., Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 216–221.
24. Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H., Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2nd ed., 2010, Springer, New York.
25. Lê, S., Josse, J., Husson, F., FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25:1 (2008), 1–18.
26. Meillon, S., Urbano, C., Schlich, P., Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 490–499.
27. Meyners, M., Temporal liking and CATA analysis of TDS data on flavored fresh cheese. Food Quality and Preference 47 (2016), 101–108.
28. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., Carr, Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Quality and Preference 30 (2013), 309–313.
29. Ng, M., Lawlor, J.B., Chandra, S., Chaya, C., Hewson, L., Hort, J., Using quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis as complementary methods for profiling commercial blackcurrant squashes. Food Quality and Preference 25 (2012), 121–134.
30. Robert, P., Escoufier, Y., A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Applied Statistics 25 (1976), 257–265.
31. Sokolowsky, M., Fischer, U., Evaluation of bitterness in white wine applying descriptive analysis, time-intensity analysis, and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 732 (2012), 46–52.
32. Sokolowsky, M., Rosenberger, A., Fischer, U., Sensory impact of skin contact on white wines characterized by descriptive analysis, time–intensity analysis and temporal dominance of sensations analysis. Food Quality and Preference 39 (2015), 285–297.
33. Tan, H.S.G., Verbaan, Y.T., Stieger, M., How will better products improve the sensory-liking and willingness to buy insect-based foods?. Food Research International 92 (2017), 95–105.
34. Tárrega, A., Marcano, J., Fiszman, S., Yogurt viscosity and fruit pieces affect satiating capacity expectations. Food Research International 89 (2016), 574–581.
35. Varela, P., Ares, G., Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Research International 48 (2012), 893–908.
36. Varela, P., Ares, G., Introduction. Varela, P., Ares, G., (eds.) Novel techniques in sensory characterization and consumer profiling, 2014, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1–7.
37. Varela, P., Pintor, A., Fiszman, S., How hydrocolloids affect the temporal oral perception of ice cream. Food Hydrocolloids 36 (2014), 220–228.
38. Vidal, L., Tárrega, A., Antúnez, L., Ares, G., Jaeger, S.R., Comparison of correspondence analysis based on Hellinger and chi-square distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 43 (2015), 106–112.