Comparison of Correspondence Analysis based on Hellinger and chi-square distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 106-112

  Vidal, Leticia ^a   Tárrega, Amparo ^b   Antúnez, Lucía ^a   Ares, Gastón ^a   Jaeger, Sara R ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

CATA; Consumer profiling; Consumer research; Hellinger distance; Sensory characterization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924962329     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ares G., Antúnez L., Giménez A., Roigard C.M., Pineau B., Hunter D.C., et al. Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:111-121.
2. Ares G., Jaeger S.R. Examination of sensory product characterization bias when check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions are used concurrently with hedonic assessments. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40:199-208.
3. Ares G., Tárrega A., Izquierdo L., Jaeger S.R. Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:135-141.
4. Beaton, D., Chin Fatt, C.R., & Abdi, H. (2013). ExPosition: Exploratory analysis with the singular value decomposition. Available a Accessed February 2013. http://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ExPosition/ExPosition.pdf.
5. Blancher G., Clavier B., Egoroff C., Duineveld K., Parcon J. A method to investigate the stability of a sorting map. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 23:36-43.
6. Cuadras C.M., Cuadras C.M. A parametric approach to correspondence analysis. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 2006, 417:64-74.
7. Greenacre M. Correspondence analysis in practice 2007, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton.
8. Jaeger S.R., Cadena R.S., Torres-Moreno M., Antúnez L., Vidal L., Giménez A., et al. Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterisation. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 35:32-40.
9. Jaeger S.R., Ccheang S.L., Yin J., Bava C.M., Giménez A., Vidal L., et al. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) responses elicited by consumers: Within-assessor reproducibility and stability of sensory product characterizations. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:56-67.
10. Jaeger S.R., Giacalone D., Roigard C.M., Pineau B., Vidal L., Gimenez A., et al. Investigation of bias of hedonic scores when co-eliciting product attribute information using CATA questions. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:242-249.
11. Josse, J., Husson, F., & Pagès, J. (2007). Testing the significance of the RV coefficient. In IASC 07, August 30th-September 1st (2007). Portugal: Aveiro. International Association for Statistical Computing.
12. Lê S. Introduction to multivariate statistical techniques for sensory characterization. Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling 2014, 41-84. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
13. Lê S., Josse J., Husson F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 25(1):1-18.
14. Legendre P., Gallagher E. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 2001, 129:271-280.
15. Meyners M., Castura J.C. Check-all-that-apply questions. Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling 2014, 271-305. CRC Press, Boca Raton. P. Varela, G. Ares (Eds.).
16. Meyners M., Castura J.C., Carr B.T. Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 30:309-319.
17. Popper, R., Abdi, H., Williams, A., & Kroll, B. J. (2011). Multi-block Hellinger analysis for creating perceptual maps from check-all-that-apply questions. In 9th Rose Marie sensory science symposium, Toronto, Canada, 4-8 september 2011.
18. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
19. Rao C.R. A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondence analysis using Hellinger distance. Qüestiió 1995, 19:23-63.
20. Robert P., Escoufier Y. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Applied Statistics 1976, 25:257-265.