Introduction

Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-8

  Varela, Paula ^a,b   Ares, Gastón ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909592846     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b16853     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Adams, J., Williams, A., Lancaster, B., and Foley, M. 2007. Advantages and uses of check-all-that-apply response compared to traditional scaling of attri-butes for salty snacks. In Seventh Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. Minneapolis, MN, August 12-16, 2007.
2. Albert, A., Salvador, A., Schlich, P., and Fiszman, S.M. 2012. Comparison between temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) and key-attribute sen-sory profiling for evaluating solid food with contrasting textural layers: Fish sticks. Food Quality and Preference 24: 111-118.
3. Ares, G., Barreiro, C., Deliza, R., Giménez, A., and Gámbaro, A. 2010. Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk des-serts. Journal of Sensory Studies 25: 67-86.
4. Bárcenas, P., Pérez Elortondo, F.J., and Albisu, M. 2004. Projective mapping in sensory analysis of ewes milk cheeses: A study on consumers and trained panel performance. Food Research International 37: 723-729.
5. Bruzzone, F., Ares, G., and Giménez, A. 2012. Consumers’ texture perception of milk desserts II-Comparison with trained assessors’ data. Journal of Texture Studies 43: 214-226.
6. Bruzzone, F., Ares, G., and Giménez, A. 2013. Temporal aspects of yoghurt tex-ture perception. International Dairy Journal 29: 124-134.
7. Cairncross, S.E. and Sjöstrom, L.B. 1950. Flavor profiles: A new approach to flavor problems. Food Technology 4: 308-311.
8. Dairou, V. and Sieffermann, J.-M. 2002. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, flash profile. Journal of Food Science 67: 826-834.
9. de Saldamando, L., Delgado, P., Herencia, P., Giménez, A., and Ares, G. 2013. Polarized sensory positioning: Do conclusions depend on the poles? Food Quality and Preference 29: 25-32.
10. Gacula, M.C. 1997. Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice. Trumbull, CT: Food and Nutrition Press.
11. Gower, J.C. 1975. Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-50.
12. Labbe, D., Schlich, P., Pineau, N., Gilbert, F., and Martin, N. 2009. Temporal dominance of sensations and sensory profiling: A comparative study. Food Quality and Preference 20: 216-221.
13. Laguna, L., Varela, P., Salvador, A., and Fiszman, S.M. 2013 A new sensory tool to analyze the oral trajectory of biscuits with different fat and fiber content. Food Research International 51: 544-553.
14. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices, 2nd edn., pp. 227-253. New York: Springer.
15. Lawless, H.T., Sheng, N., and Knoops, S.S.C.P. 1995. Multidimensional scaling of sorting data applied to cheese perception. Food Quality and Preference 6: 91-98.
16. Moskowitz, H.R. 1972. Subjective ideals and sensory optimization in evaluating perceptual dimensions of food. Journal of Applied Psychology 56: 60-66.
17. Moussaoui, K.A. and Varela, P. 2010. Exploring consumer product profiling tech-niques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 21: 1088-1099.
18. Murray, J.M., Delahunty, C.M., and Baxter, I.A. 2001. Descriptive sensory analy-sis: Past, present and future. Food Research International 34: 461-471.
19. Pagès, J. 2005. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Quality and Preference 16: 642-649.
20. Risvik, E., McEvan, J.A., Colwill, J.S., Rogers, R., and Lyon, D.H. 1994. Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference 5: 263-269.
21. Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, M.L., and Young, F.W. 1981. Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Academic Press.
22. Stone, H. and Sidel, J.L. 2004. Sensory Evaluation Practices. London, U.K.: Elsevier Academic Press.
23. Szczesniak, A.S. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food Quality and Preference 13: 215-225.
24. Teillet, E., Schlich, P., Urbano, C., Cordelle, S., and Guichard, E. 2010. Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Quality and Preference 21: 967-976.
25. ten Kleij, F. and Musters, P.A.D. 2003. Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 14: 43-52.
26. Thomson, D. and McEwan, J. 1988. An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods. Appetite 10: 181-193.
27. Varela, P. and Ares, G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characteriza-tion. Food Research International 48: 893-908.
28. Williams, A. and Arnold, G. 1985. A comparison of the aromas of 6 coffees char-acterized by conventional profiling, free-choice profiling and similarity scal-ing methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 204-214.
29. Worch, T. 2012. The ideal profile analysis: From the validation to the statisti-cal analysis of ideal profile data. PhD dissertation. http://www.opp.nl/uk/. Accessed June 10, 2013.