Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 309-319

  Meyners, Michael ^a   Castura, John C ^b   Carr, B Thomas ^c  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b Compusense Inc ^*  (Canada)

^c Carr Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

Check all that apply (CATA); Cochran's Q; Correspondence analysis; Multidimensional alignment; Penalty analysis; Penalty lift analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880992416     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abdi, H., & Willams, L. J. (2010). Correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind, D. M., Dougherty, & B. Frey (Eds.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 267-278). Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
2. Adams, J., Williams, A., Lancaster, B., & Foley, M. (2007). Advantages and uses of check-all-that-apply response compared to traditional scaling of attributes. In 7th Rose-Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium. Minneapolis, MN, USA.
3. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis 2002, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 2nd ed.
4. Agresti A., Liu I. Modeling a categorical variable allowing arbitrarily many category choices. Biometrics 1999, 55:936-943.
5. Arbuthnott J. An argument for divine providence, taken from the constant regularity observ'd in the births of both sexes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1710, 27:186-190.
6. Ares G., Dauber C., Fernández E., Giménez A., Varela P. Penalty analysis based on CATA questions to identify drivers of liking and directions for product reformulation. Food Quality and Preference 2013, in press. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.014.
7. Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 1955, 11:375-386.
8. Beaton, D. (2012). prettyGraphs: publication-quality graphics. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prettyGraphs.
9. Beaton, D., Chin Fatt, C. R., & Abdi, H. (2012). ExPosition: Exploratory analysis with the singular value decomposition. R package version 1.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ExPosition.
10. Bilder C.R., Loughlin T.M. Testing for conditional multiple marginal independence. Biometrics 2002, 58:200-208.
11. Bilder C.R., Loughlin T.M. Testing for marginal independence between two categorical variables with multiple responses. Biometrics 2004, 60:241-248.
12. Carr, B. T., Dzuroska, J., Taylor, R. O., Lanza, K., & Pansini, C. (2009). Multidimensional Alignment (MDA): A simple numerical tool for assessing the degree of association between products and attributes on perceptual maps. In 8th Rose-Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium. Florence, Italy.
13. Castura. J. C. & Meyners, M. (in press). Check-all-that apply questions. In: P. Varela and G. Ares (eds.): Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
14. Cochran W.G. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika 1950, 37:256-266.
15. 2 tests. Biometrics 1954, 10:417-451.
16. Cowden, J., Moore, K., & Vanleur, K. (2009). Application of check-all-that-apply response to identify and optimize attributes important to consumer's Ideal product. In 8th Rose-Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium. Florence, Italy.
17. Edgington E., Onghena P. Randomization tests 2007, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 4th ed.
18. Ennis D.M., Ennis J.M. Analysis and Thurstonian scaling of applicability scores. Journal of Sensory Studies 2013, 28:188-193.
19. Escofier B., Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples; objectifs, méthodes et interprétation 2008, Dunod, Paris, France. 4th ed.
20. Fellows, I. (2012). wordcloud: Word Clouds. R package version 2.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud.
21. Greenacre M. Correspondence analysis in practice 2007, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. 2nd ed.
22. Hellinger E. Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 1909, 136:210-271.
23. Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 1901, 37:547-579.
24. Lancaster, B., & Foley, M. (2007). Determining statistical significance for choose-all-that-apply question responses. In 7th Rose-Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium. Minneapolis, MN, USA.
25. Lapointe F.-J., Legendre P. A classification of pure malt Scotch whiskies. Applied Statistics 1994, 43:237-257.
26. Legendre P., Gallagher E. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 2001, 129:271-280.
27. Mardia K.V. Some properties of classical multidimensional scaling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1978, A7:1233-1241.
28. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947, 12:153-157.
29. Meyners, M., & Hartwig, P. (2009). Consumer associations with a toddlers' product color evaluated by a choose-all-that-apply questionnaire. In 8th Rose-Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium. Florence, Italy.
30. Meyners M., Pineau N. Statistical inference for temporal dominance of sensations data using randomization tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21(7):805-814.
31. Popper, R., Abdi, H., Williams, A., & Kroll, B. J. (2011). Multi-block Hellinger analysis for creating perceptual maps from check-all-that-apply questions. In 9th Rose-Marie sensory science symposium, Toronto, ON, Canada.
32. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
33. Tate M.W., Brown S.M. Note on the Cochran Q test. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1970, 65:155-160.
34. Wakeling I.N., Raats M.M., MacFie H.J.H. A new significance test for consensus in generalized procrustes analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:91-96.
35. Williams, A., Carr, B.T., & Popper, R. (2011). Exploring analysis options for check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. In 9th Rose-Marie sensory science symposium, Toronto, ON, Canada.