Simulation Fellowship Programs: An International Survey of Program Directors

Academic Medicine

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1204-1211

  Natal, Brenda ^a   Szyld, Demian ^b   Pasichow, Scott ^c   Bismilla, Zia ^d   Pirie, Jonathan ^d   Cheng, Adam ^e  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CURRICULUM; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIMULATION TRAINING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ENGLAND; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SIMULATION TRAINING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85017186759     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001668     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cook DA Hatala R Brydges R. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011; 306: 978 988.
2. Cheng A Lang TR Starr SR Pusic M Cook DA. Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: e1313 e1323.
3. Cheng A Lockey A Bhanji F Lin Y Hunt EA Lang E. The use of high-fidelity manikins for advanced life support training-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015; 93: 142 149.
4. Cheng A Eppich W Grant V Sherbino J Zendejas B Cook DA. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2014; 48: 657 666.
5. Issenberg SB McGaghie WC Petrusa ER Lee Gordon D Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 10 28.
6. Ziv A Wolpe PR Small SD Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 783 788.
7. Cheng A Duff J Grant E Kissoon N Grant VJ. Simulation in paediatrics: An educational revolution. Paediatr Child Health. 2007; 12: 465 468.
8. Cheng A Goldman RD Aish MA Kissoon N. A simulation-based acute care curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellowship training programs. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010; 26: 475 480.
9. McGaghie WC Issenberg SB Petrusa ER Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 50 63.
10. Cheng A Grant V Dieckmann P Arora S Robinson T Eppich W. Faculty development for simulation programs: Five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10: 217 222.
11. Eppich W Cheng A. Competency-based simulation education: Should competency standards apply to simulation educators? BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2015; 1: 3 4.
12. Donaldson L. 150 Years of the Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer: On the State of Public Health 2008. March 2009. London, UK: UK Department of Health; http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/AnnualReports/DH-096206. Accessed January 19, 2017.
13. Eppich W Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10: 106 115.
14. Cheng A Palaganas J Eppich W Rudolph J Robinson T Grant V. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: A primer for facilitators. Simul Healthc. 2015; 10: 69 75.
15. Cheng A Rodgers DL van der Jagt É Eppich W O'Donnell J. Evolution of the pediatric advanced life support course: Enhanced learning with a new debriefing tool and Web-based module for pediatric advanced life support instructors. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012; 13: 589 595.
16. Cheng A Hunt EA Donoghue A; EXPRESS Investigators. Examining pediatric resuscitation education using simulation and scripted debriefing: A multicenter randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 528 536.
17. Cook DA Hamstra SJ Brydges R. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013; 35: e867 e898.
18. Raemer D Anderson M Cheng A Fanning R Nadkarni V Savoldelli G. Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6 (suppl): S52 S57.
19. Rudolph JW Simon R Raemer DB Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 1010 1016.
20. Kotal ER Sivertson RM Wolfe SP Lammers RL Overton DT. A survey of simulation fellowship programs. J Emerg Med. 2015; 48: 351 355.
21. Hayden EM Gordon JA. Levin A DeMaria S Jr Schwartz AD Sim A. Fellowship training in education. In: The Comprehensive Textbook of HealthCare Simulation. 2013: New York, NY: Springer; 587 592.
22. American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons Program for the Accreditation of Education Institutes program requirements. https://www.facs.org/∼/media/files/education/aei/aei%20requirements.ashx. Published 2013. Accessed January 19, 2017.
23. Qayumi K Pachev G Zheng B. Status of simulation in health care education: An international survey. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014; 5: 457 467.
24. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. SSH accreditation of healthcare simulation programs. www.ssih.org/Accreditation. Published 2017. Accessed February 8, 2017.
25. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Accreditation standards for simulation programs. http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cpd/accreditation-simulation-programs-e. Published October 2015. Accessed February 8, 2017.
26. Srinivasan M Li ST Meyers FJ. "Teaching as a competency": Competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 1211 1220.
27. Steinert Y Mann K Centeno A. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME guide no. 8. Med Teach. 2006; 28: 497 526.
28. Leslie K Baker L Egan-Lee E Esdaile M Reeves S. Advancing faculty development in medical education: A systematic review. Acad Med. 2013; 88: 1038 1045.
29. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 101 108.
30. Sullivan PB Buckle A Nicky G Atkinson SH. Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12: 26.
31. Finn K Chiappa V Puig A Hunt DP. How to become a better clinical teacher: A collaborative peer observation process. Med Teach. 2011; 33: 151 155.
32. Adshead L White PT Stephenson A. Introducing peer observation of teaching to GP teachers: A questionnaire study. Med Teach. 2006; 28: e68 e73.
33. Skeff KM. Evaluation of a method for improving the teaching performance of attending physicians. Am J Med. 1983; 75: 465 470.
34. Cheng A Auerbach M Hunt EA. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: 1091 1101.