Feedback models for learning, teaching and performance

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 413-424

  Molloy, Elizabeth K ^a   Boud, David ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behaviourist principles of learning; Constructivist principles of learning; Feedback; Learner agency; Self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85016480035     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_33     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Asghar, A. (2009). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy forffist year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (4), 403-417.
2. Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73-85.
3. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35-48). London: Kogan Page.
4. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22 (2), 151-167.
5. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment for higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 181-197). London: Routledge.
6. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation:Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (4), 210-216.
7. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning:A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65 (3), 245-281.
8. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2010). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36 (1), 1-13.
9. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
10. Clariana, R., Wagner, B., & Roher Murphy, L. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (3), 5-21.
11. Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
12. Ende, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 777-781.
13. Ende, J., Pomerantz, A., & Erickson, F. (1995). Preceptors' strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting:A qualitative analysis. Academic Medicine, 70, 224-229.
14. Falchikov, N. (2002). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge and Palmer.
15. Fantuzzo, J., & Riggio, R. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (2), 173-177.
16. Fernando, N., Cleland, J., McKenzie, H., Cassar, K., Fernando, N., Cleland, J., et al. (2008). Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments. Medical Education, 42 (1), 89-95.
17. Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford:Blackwell.
18. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills intervention on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Research in Education, 66, 99-136.
19. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
20. Henderson, P., Ferguson-Smith, A., & Johnson, M. (2005). Developing essential professional skills: A framework for teaching and learning about feedback. BMC Medical Education, 5, 1-6.
21. Higgs, J., Richardson, B., & Abrandt Dahlgren, M. (Eds.). (2004). Developing practice knowledge for health professionals. Oxford:Butterworth Heinemann.
22. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2011). The National Student Survey: Finding and Trends. 2006-2010. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
23. Hounsell, D. (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 101-13). London: Routledge.
24. Ilgen, D., & Davis, C. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 550-565.
25. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254-284.
26. Kluger, A., & Van Dijk, D. (2010). Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Medical Education, 44, 1166-1174.
27. Krause, K., Hartley, R., James, R., & McInnis, C. (2005). Theffist year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Retrieved August 5, 2009, from http://www.cshe. unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/FYEReport05KLK.pdf.
28. Kulhavy, R., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written instruction:The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279-308.
29. Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58 (1), 79-97.
30. Ladyshewsky, R. (2010). Building competency in the novice allied health professional through peer coaching. Journal of Allied Health, 39 (2), 77-82.
31. Latting, J. (1992). Giving corrective feedback: A decisional analysis. Social Work, 37, 424-430.
32. Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3), 279-290.
33. MacDonald, R. (1991). Developmental students' processing of teacher feedback in composition instruction. Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8 (5), n5.
34. Molloy, E. (2009). Time to pause: Feedback in clinical education, Chapter 8. In C. Delany & E. Molloy (Eds.), Clinical education in the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier.
35. Molloy, E. (2010). The feedforward mechanism: A way forward in clinical learning? Medical Education, 44, 1157-1159.
36. Molloy, E., & Clarke, D. (2005). The positioning of physiotherapy students and clinical supervisors in feedback sessions. Focus on Health Professional Education, 7, 79-90.
37. Mory, E. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In M. Spector, M. Spector, D. David Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, M. Driscoll, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125-143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in theffist year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (3), 335-352.
40. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218.
41. Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 143-154.
42. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback:All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (3), 277-289.
43. Pritchard, R., Jones, S., Roth, P., Stuebing, K., & Ekeberg, S. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (2), 337-358.
44. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13.
45. Riordan, T., & Loacker, G. (2009). Collaborative and systemic assessment of student learning: From principles to practice. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 175-192). Dordrecht: Springer.
46. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
47. Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (2), 147-164.
48. Sadler, D. (1983). Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning. Journal of Higher Education, 54 (1), 60-79.
49. Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
50. Sinclair, H. K., & Cleland, J. A. (2007). Undergraduate medical students: Who seeks formative feedback? Medical Education, 41, 580-582.
51. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 153-189.
52. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Oxford: Houghton Mif fl in.
53. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45 (4), 477-501.