Aroma-related cross-modal interactions for sugar reduction in milk desserts: Influence on consumer perception

Food Research International

Volumn 97, Issue , 2017, Pages 45-50

  Alcaire, Florencia ^a   Antúnez, Lucía ^a   Vidal, Leticia ^a   Giménez, Ana ^a   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

CATA questions; Consumer studies; Cross modal interactions; Product reformulation; Sugar reduction

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; FOOD ADDITIVES; STARCH;

CATA QUESTIONS; CONSUMER STUDIES; CROSS-MODAL INTERACTION; PRODUCT REFORMULATION; SUGAR REDUCTION;

ODORS;

CARBOHYDRATE; FLAVORING AGENT; FRAGRANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DAIRY PRODUCT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILK; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VANILLA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DAIRY PRODUCTS; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILK; ODORANTS; SUGARS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VANILLA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85016307493     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: 18737145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., A consumer-based approach to salt reduction: Case study with bread. Food Research International 90 (2016), 66–72.
2. Arancibia, C., Jublot, L., Costell, E., Bayarri, S., Flavor release and sensory characteristics of o/w emulsions. Influence of composition, microstructure and rheological behavior. Food Research International 44 (2011), 1632–1641.
3. Ares, G., Etchemendy, R., Atúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Jaeger, S., Visual attention by consumers to check-all-that-apply questions: Insights to support methodological development. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 210–220.
4. Ares, G., Giménez, A., Gámbaro, A., Does information about the source of functional ingredients influence consumer perception of functional milk desserts?. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88 (2008), 2061–2068.
5. Ares, G., Giménez, A., Barreiro, C., Gámbaro, A., Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 286–294.
6. Bayarri, S., Carbonell, I., Barrios, E.X., Costell, E., Impact of sensory differences on consumer acceptability of yoghurt and yoghurt-like products. International Dairy Journal 21 (2011), 111–118.
7. Biguzzi, C., Schlich, P., Lange, C., The impact of sugar and fat reduction on perception and liking of biscuits. Food Quality and Preference 35 (2014), 41–47.
8. Boakes, R.A., Hemberger, H., Odour-modulation of taste ratings by chefs. Food Quality and Preference 25 (2012), 81–86.
9. Bult, J.H.F., de Wijk, R.A., Hummel, T., Investigations on multimodal sensory integration: Texture, taste, and ortho- and retronasal olfactory stimuli in concert. Neuroscience Letters 411 (2007), 6–10.
10. Burseg, K.M.M., Camacho, S., Knoop, J., Bult, J.H.F., Sweet taste intensity is enhanced by temporal fluctuation of aroma and taste, and depends on phase shift. Physiology and Behavior 101 (2010), 726–730.
11. Cadoret, M., Husson, F., Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 106–115.
12. Cardoso, J.M.P., Bolini, H.M.A., Descriptive profile of peach nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 23 (2008), 804–816.
13. Chang, M.H., Chiou, W.B., Differential threshold and psychophysical power function of sweetness sensation: Applied psychophysics and prospect theory on reformulating baking products. Journal of Sensory Studies 21 (2006), 534–551.
14. Chollet, M., Gille, D., Schmid, A., Walther, B., Piccinali, P., Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 96 (2013), 5501–5511.
15. Civille, C.V., Oftedal, K.N., Sensory evaluation techniques — make “good for you” taste “good”. Physiology & Behavior 107 (2012), 598–605.
16. Drewnowski, A., Nordensten, K., Dwyer, J., Replacing sugar and fat in cookies: Impact on product quality and preference. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998), 13–20.
17. Dubois, G.E., Prakash, I., Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 3 (2012), 353–380.
18. Gardner, C., Wylie-Rosett, J., Gidding, S.S., Steffen, L.M., Johnson, R.K., Reader, D., et al. Nonnutritive sweeteners: Current use and health perspectives: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 35:8 (2012), 1798–1808.
19. González-Tomás, L., Bayarri, S., Taylor, A.J., Costell, E., Flavour release and perception from model dairy custards. Food Research International 40 (2007), 520–528.
20. Hoppert, K., Zahn, S., Puschmann, A., Ullmann, I., Rohm, H., Quantification of sensory difference thresholds for fat and sweetness in dairy-based emulsions. Food Quality and Preference 26 (2012), 52–57.
21. ISO, Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO standard 8589. 2007, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
22. Johnson, R.K., Appel, L.J., Brands, M., Howard, B.V., Lefevre, M., Lustig, R.H., et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 120 (2009), 1011–1020.
23. Kaufmann, S.F.M., Palzer, S., Food structure engineering for nutrition, health and wellness. Procedia Food Science 1 (2011), 1479–1486.
24. Keršiené, M., Adams, A., Dubra, A., De Kimpe, N., Leskauskaité, D., Interactions between flavour release and rheological properties in model custard desserts: Effect of starch concentration and milk fat. Food Chemistry 108 (2008), 1183–1191.
25. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B., lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.42. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest, 2016.
26. Labbe, D., Martin, N., Impact of novel olfactory stimuli at supra and subthreshold concentrations on the perceived sweetness of sucrose after associative learning. Chemical Senses 34 (2009), 645–651.
27. Labbe, D., Rytz, A., Morgenegg, C., Ali, S., Martin, N., Subthreshold olfactory stimulation can enhance sweetness. Chemical Senses 34 (2007), 645–651.
28. Lê, S., Josse, J., Husson, F., FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25:1 (2008), 1–18.
29. Lustig, R.H., Schmidt, L.A., Brindis, C.D., The toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482 (2012), 27–29.
30. Ma, Y., He, F.J., Yin, Y., Hashem, K.M., McGregor, G.A., Gradual reduction of sugar in soft drinks without substitution as a strategy to reduce overweight, obesity, and type 2 diabetes: A modelling study. The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology 4 (2016), 105–114.
31. MacGregor, G.A., Hashem, K.M., Action on sugar — Lessons from UK salt reduction programme. Lancet 383 (2014), 929–931.
32. Manoukian, E.B., Mathematical nonparametric statistics. 1986, Gordon & Breach, New York, NY.
33. Markey, O., Lovegrove, J.A., Methven, L., Sensory profiles and consumer acceptability of a range of sugar-reduced products on the UK market. Food Research International 72 (2015), 133–139.
34. Mattes, R.D., Popkin, B.M., Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: Effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89:1 (2009), 1–14.
35. Moynihan, P.J., Kelly, S.A., Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. Journal of Dental Research 93 (2014), 8–18.
36. Murphy, C., Cain, W.S., Taste and olfaction: Independence vs. interaction. Physiology and Behavior 24 (1980), 601–605.
37. Oliveira, D., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Castura, J., Deliza, R., Ares, G., Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking. Food Research International 75 (2015), 148–156.
38. Oliveira, D., Reis, F., Deliza, R., Rosenthal, A., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Difference thresholds for added sugar in chocolate-flavoured milk: Recommendations for gradual sugar reduction. Food Research International 89 (2016), 448–453.
39. Pineli, L.L.O., de Aguiar, L.A., Fiusa, A., Botelho, R.B.A., Zandonadi, R.P., Melo, L., Sensory impact of lowering sugar content in orange nectars to design healthier, low-sugar industrialized beverages. Appetite 96 (2016), 239–244.
40. Poinot, P., Arvisenet, G., Ledauphin, J., Gaillard, J.L., Prost, C., How can aroma-related cross-modal interactions be analysed? A review of current methodologies. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 304–316.
41. Core Team, R., R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2016, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
42. Saint-Eve, A., Lauverjat, C., Magnan, C., Déléris, I., Souchon, I., Reducing salt and fat content: Impact of composition, texture and cognitive interactions on the perception of flavoured model cheeses. Food Chemistry 116 (2009), 167–175.
43. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition, Draft carbohydrates and health report. Scientific consultation: 26 June to 1 September 2014. Retrieved from http://www.sacn.gov.uk/reports_position_statements/reports/scientific_consultation_draft_sacn_carbohydrates_and_health_report_-_june_2014.html, 2014 (Accessed 10th August 2016).
44. Stieger, M., van de Velde, F., Microstructure, texture and oral processing: New ways to reduce sugar and salt in foods. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 18 (2013), 334–348.
45. Te Morenga, L., Mallard, S., Mann, J., Dietary sugars and body weight: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ, 346, 2013, e7492.
46. Thompson, J.L., Lopetcharat, K., Drake, M.A., Preferences for commercial strawberry drinkable yogurts among African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (2007), 4974–4987.
47. Tournier, C., Sulmont-Rossé, C., Sémon, E., Vignon, A., Issanchou, S., Guichard, E., A study on texture–taste–aroma interactions: Physico-chemical and cognitive mechanisms. International Dairy Journal 19 (2009), 450–458.
48. van Raaij, J., Hendriksen, M., Verhagen, H., Potential for improvement of population diet through reformulation of commonly eaten foods. Public Health Nutrition 12:3 (2009), 325–330.
49. Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Correa, S., Ábalos, R.A., Gómez, B., Giménez, A., et al. Assessment of global and individual reproducibility of projective mapping with consumers. Journal of Sensory Studies 29 (2014), 74–87.
50. Vio, F., Uauy, R., Case study #9–5. The sugar controversy. Pinstrup-Andersen, P., Cheng, F., (eds.) Food policy for developing countries: Case studies, 2007, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
51. World Health Organization and Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, WHO/FAO joint expert consultation on diet, nutrition, and the prevention of chronic diseases. WHO technical report series no. 916. 2003, World Health Organization, Geneva.
52. Yang, Q., Gain weight by “going diet?” artificial sweeteners and the neurobiology of sugar cravings: Neuroscience 2010. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 83:2 (2010), 101–108.
53. Zorn, S., Alcaire, F., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 36 (2014), 135–143.