Sensory impact of lowering sugar content in orange nectars to design healthier, low-sugar industrialized beverages

Appetite

Volumn 96, Issue , 2016, Pages 239-244

  Pineli, Lívia de Lacerda de Oliveira ^a   Aguiar, Lorena Andrade de ^a   Fiusa, Anndressa ^a   Botelho, Raquel Braz de Assunção ^a   Zandonadi, Renata Puppin ^a   Melo, Lauro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Orange nectar; Public health policies; Sensory analysis; Sugar lowering

Indexed keywords

ADDED SUGAR; SUGAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; FRAGRANCE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEVERAGE; BITTER TASTE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLAVOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NECTAR; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; ORANGE JUICE; PALATABILITY; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SOUR TASTE; SWEETNESS; VISCOSITY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS; BRAZIL; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD PREFERENCE; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; SWEET ORANGE; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAZIL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CITRUS SINENSIS; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DIETARY CARBOHYDRATES; FEMALE; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICES; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; ODORANTS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84943541875     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ares G., Tárrega A., Izquierdo L., Jaeger S.R. Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 31:135-141.
2. Australian Food & Grocery Council Health, nutrition and scientific affairs 2006, Accessed 30.04.15. http://www.afgc.org.au/our-expertise/health-nutrition-and-scientific-affairs/.
3. Biguzzi C., Schlich P., Lange C. The impact of sugar and fat reduction on perception and liking of biscuits. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 35:41-47.
4. Bouhlal S., Bernard C., Issanchou S., Nicklaus S. Sugar content impacts food intake in toddlers, but could be reduced. Appetite 2011, 57S.
5. o 3.510, June 16, 2000. Change of regulation devices approved by decree no. 2314 of September 4, 1997, which provides for the standardization, classification, registration, inspection, production and supervision of beverages 2000, Accessed 05.05.15. http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis-consulta/consultarLegislacao.do?operacao=visualizar&id=1012.
6. o 6.871, June 4th , 2009. Regulates law no. 8918 of July 14, 1994, which provides for the standardization, classification, registration, inspection, production and supervision of beverages 2009, Accessed 26.07.15. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2009/Decreto/D6871.htm.
7. Brazilian Department of Agriculture Normative ruling no. 42, of September 11, 2013 2013, Accessed 05.04.15. http://crn3.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/INSTRUCAO-NORMATIVA-N42-11.07.13.pdf.
8. Brazilian Department of Health Technical cooperation agreement by Federal Government, between the Ministry of Health and the ABIA, in order to join forces and work together to implement actions to promote healthy lifestyles, which includes a healthy, balanced and nutritionally adequate diet 2007, Published November 2007. Accessed 05.04.15. http://189.28.128.100/nutricao/docs/geral/acordodecooperacaoabia_ms.pdf.
9. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009: análise da disponibilidade domiciliar de alimentos e do estado nutricional no Brasil 2010, IBGE, Rio de Janeiro.
10. Cardoso J.M.P., Battochio J.R., Cardello H.M.A.B. Equi-sweetness and sweetening power of different sweetening agents in differents temperatures of consumption of tea drink in soluble power. Brazilian Food Science and Technology 2004, 24:448-452.
11. Cardoso J.M.P., Bolini H.M.A. Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. Food Research International 2007, 40:1249-1253.
12. Chang M.H., Chiou W.B. Differential threshold and psychophysical power function of sweetness sensation: applied psychophysics and prospect theory on formulating baking products. Journal of Sensory Studies 2006, 21:534-551.
13. Chiou W.B., Yeh L.T., Chang M.H. Effects of health-related claims on the differential threshold of consumers' sweetness sensation. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:621-633.
14. Chollet M., Gille G., Schmid A., Walther B., Piccinali P. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 2013, 96:5501-5511.
15. Green B.G., Lim J., Osterhoff F., Blacher K., Nachtigal D. Taste mixture interactions: suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness. Physiology Behavior 2010, 101:731-737.
16. Hoppert K., Zahn S., Puschmann A., Ullmann I., Rohm H. Quantification of sensory difference thresholds for fat and sweetness in dairy-based emulsions. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26:52-57.
17. Hu F.B. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obesity Review 2013, 14:606-619.
18. ISO Standard 5495: Sensory analysis--Methodology--Paired comparison test 1983.
19. James C.E., Laing D.G., Jinks A.L., Oram N,Hutchinson I. Taste response functions of adults and children using differentiating scales. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 15:77-82.
20. James C.E., Laing D.G., Oram N. A comparison of the ability of 8-9-year-old children and adults to detect taste stimuli. Physiology & Behavior 1997, 62:193-197.
21. Jeong M., Gilmore J.S., Bleakley A., Jordan A. Local news media framing of obesity in the context of a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction media campaign. Journal of Nutritional Education and Behavior 2014, 46:583-588.
22. Kelly G.A. The psychology of personal constructs 1955, Norton, New York.
23. Kist B.B., Vencato A.Z., Santos C., Carvalho C., Reetz E.R., Poll H., et al. Anuário brasileiro da fruticultura 2012. Santa Cruz do Sul: EditoraGazeta Santa Cruz 2012, 128.
24. Lawless H.T. Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1979, 93:538-547.
25. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food. Principles and practices 1998, Chapman & Hall, New York.
26. Liem D.G., Mars M., De Graaf C. Sweet preferences and sugar consumption of 4- and 5-year-old children: role of parents. Appetite 2004, 43:235-245.
27. Lima Filho T., Minim V.P.R., Silva R.C.S.N., Della Lucia S.M., Minim L.A. Methodology for determination of two new sensory thresholds: compromised acceptance threshold and rejection threshold. Food Research International 2015, 76:561-566.
28. Longo-Silva G., Toloni M.H.A., Menezes R.C.A., Asakuraa L., Oliveira M.A.A., Taddei J.A.A.C. Introduction of soft drinks and processed juice in the diet of infants attending public day care centers. RevistaPaulista de Pediatria 2015, 33:34-41.
29. Macfie H.J., Bratchell N., Greenhoff K., Vallis L. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 4:129-148.
30. Malam S., Clegg S., Kirwan S., McGinigal S., Raats M., Shepherd R., et al. .Comprehension and use of UK nutrition signpost labelling schemes 2009, Food Standards Agency (UK), London, UK, Available, Accessed 30.04.15. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131104005023/http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/pmpreport.pdf.
31. Markey O., Lovegrove J.A., Methven L. Sensory profiles and consumer acceptability of a range of sugar-reduced products on the UK market. Food Research International 2015, 72:133-139.
32. Milenkovic D., Deval C., Dubray C., Mazur A., Morand C. Hesperidin displays relevant role in the nutrigenomic effect of orange juice on blood leukocytes in human volunteers: a randomized controlled cross-over study. Plos One 2011, 6:e26669.
33. Mojet J., Heidemma J., Christ-Hazelhof E. Taste perception with age: generic or specific losses in supra-threshold intensities of five taste qualities?. Chemical Senses 2003, 28:397-413.
34. Moraes P.C.B.T., Bolini H.M.A. Different sweeteners in beverages prepared with instant and roasted ground coffee: ideal and equivalent sweetness. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:215-225.
35. Moskowitz H.R. Sensory intensity versus hedonic functions: classical psychophysical approaches. Journal of Food Quality 1982, 5:109-137.
36. Osornio M.M.L., Hough G. Comparing 3-point versus 9-point just-about-right scales for determining the optimum concentration of sweetness in a beverage. Journal of Sensory Studies 2010, 25:1-17.
37. Park S., Onufrak S., Sherry B., Blanck H.M. The relationship between health-related knowledge and sugar-sweetened beverage intake among US adults. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2014, 114:1059-1066.
38. Prescott J., Norris L., Kunst M., Kim S. Estimating a "consumer rejection threshold" for cork taint in white wine. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:345-349.
39. Rocha I.F.O., Bolini H.M.A. Different sweeteners in passion fruit juice: ideal and equivalent sweetness. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2015, 62:861-867.
40. Roessler E.B., Pangborn R.M., Sidel J.L., Stone H. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired preference, paired difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. Journal of Food Science 1978, 43:940-941.
41. Sartor F., Donaldson L.F., Markland D.A., Loveday H., Jackson M.J., Kubis H.P. Taste perception and implicit attitude toward sweet related to body mass index and soft drink supplementation. Appetite 2011, 57:237-246.
42. Shepherd R., Raats M. The psychology of food choice 2006, 399. CABI, Oxfordshire.
43. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices 2004, 408. Academic Press, New York. 3rd ed.
44. Umbelino D.C. Sensory characterization by descriptive quantitative analysis juice time-intensity and mango pulp (Mangiferaindica L.) sweteners with different edulcorants 2005, PhD thesis (Food Science and Nutrition) - FEA, UniversidadeEstadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
45. World Health Organization WHO guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children 2015, Published February 2015. Accessed 05.04.15. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/149782/1/9789241549028_eng.pdf?ua=1.
46. Zheng M., Rangan A., Olsen N.J., Andersen L.B., Wedderkopp N., Kristensen P., Heitmann B.L. Substituting sugar-sweetened beverages with water or milk is inversely associated with body fatness development from childhood to adolescence. Nutrition 2015, 31:38-44.