Assessment of global and individual reproducibility of projective mapping with consumers

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 74-87

  Vidal, Leticia ^a   Silva Cadena, Rafael ^a   Correa, Silvana ^b   Ábalos, Rosa A ^b   Gómez, Beatriz ^b   Giménez, Ana ^a   Varela, Paula ^c,d   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ENTRE RÍOS   (Argentina)

^c INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^d NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893972603     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12083     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abdi, H. 2010. Congruence: Congruence coefficient, RV coefficient, and mantel coefficient. In Encyclopedia of Research Design (N.J. Salkind, D.M. Dougherty and B. Frey, eds.) pp. 222-229, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
2. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Chollet, S. and Chrea, C. 2007. Analyzing assessors and products in sorting tasks: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 627-640.
3. Albert, A., Varela, P., Salvador, A., Hough, G. and Fiszman, S. 2011. Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 463-473.
4. Ares, G., Deliza, R., Barreiro, C., Giménez, A. and Gámbaro, A. 2010a. Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 417-426.
5. Ares, G., Giménez, A., Barreiro, C. and Gámbaro, A. 2010b. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 286-294.
6. Ares, G., Varela, P., Rado, G. and Gimenez, A. 2011. Are consumer profiling techniques equivalent for some product categories? The case of orange-flavored powdered drinks. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 46, 1600-1608.
7. Barcenas, P., Pérez Elortondo, F.J. and Albisu, M. 2004. Projective mapping in sensory analysis of ewes milk cheeses: A study on consumers and trained panel performance. Food Res. Int. 37, 723-729.
8. Bécue-Bertaut, M. and Pagès, J. 2004. A principal axes method for comparing contingency tables: MFACT. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 45, 481-503.
9. Blancher, G., Clavier, B., Egoroff, C., Duineveld, K. and Parcon, J. 2012. A method to investigate the stability of a sorting map. Food Qual. Prefer. 23, 36-43.
10. Carrillo, E., Varela, P. and Fiszman, S. 2012. Packaging information as a modulator of consumers' perception of enriched and reduced-calorie biscuits in tasting and non-tasting tests. Food Qual. Prefer. 25, 105-115.
11. Cartier, R., Rytz, A., Lecomte, A., Poblete, E., Krystlik, J., Belin, E. and Martin, N. 2006. Sorting procedure as an alternative to quantitative descriptive analysis to obtain a product sensory map. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 562-571.
12. Chollet, S., Lelièvre, M., Abdi, H. and Valentin, D. 2011. Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 507-520.
13. de Saldamando, L., Delgado, J., Herencia, P., Giménez, A. and Ares, G. 2013. Polarized sensory positioning: Do conclusions depend on the poles? Food Qual. Prefer. 29, 25-32.
14. Dehlholm, C., Brockhoff, P.B., Mejnert, L., Aaslyng, M.D. and Bredie, W.L.P. 2012a. Rapid descriptive sensory methods - comparison of free multiple sorting, partial napping, napping, flash profiling and conventional profiling. Food Qual. Prefer. 26, 267-277.
15. Dehlholm, C., Brockhoff, P.B. and Bredie, W.L.P. 2012b. Confidence ellipses: A variation based on parametric bootstrapping applicable on Multiple Factor Analysis results for rapid graphical evaluation. Food Qual. Prefer. 26, 278-280.
16. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Durand-Daubin, D., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A. and Nicod, A. 2004. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Qual. Prefer. 15, 781-791.
17. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Teillet, E., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A. and Nicod, H. 2006. An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 17, 604-614.
18. Hopfer, H. and Heymann, H. 2013. A summary of projective mapping observations - the effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements. Food Qual. Prefer. 28, 164-181.
19. ISO. 1988. Sensory Analysis: General Guidance for the Design of Test Rooms, ISO 8589, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
20. Jaeger, S., Chheang, S.L., Yin, J., Bava, C.M., Gimenez, A., Vidal, L. and Ares, G. 2013. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) responses elicited by consumers: Within-assessor reproducibility and stability of sensory product characterizations. Food Qual. Prefer. 30, 56-67.
21. Josse, J., Pagés, J. and Husson, F. 2008. Testing the significance of the RV coefficient. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 82-91.
22. Kennedy, J. 2010. Evaluation of replicated projective mapping of granola bars. J. Sensory Studies 25, 672-684.
23. Kennedy, J. and Heymann, H. 2009. Projective mapping and descriptive analysis of milk and dark chocolate. J. Sensory Studies 24, 220-233.
24. King, M.J., Cliff, M.A. and Hall, J.W. 1998. Comparison of projective mapping and sorting data collection and multivariate methodologies for identification of similarity-of-use of snack bars. J. Sensory Studies, 13, 347-358.
25. Kostov, B., Bécue-Bertaut, M. and Husson, F. 2014. An original methodology for the analysis and interpretation of word-count based methods: Multiple factor analysis for contingency tables complemented by consensual words. Food Qual. Prefer. 32, 35-40.
26. Lawless, H.T. and Glatter, S. 1990. Consistency of multidimensional scaling models derived from odor sorting. J. Sensory Studies 5, 217-230.
27. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices, 2nd Ed., Springer, New York, NY.
28. Le Dien, S. and Pagès, J. 2003. Hierarchical multiple factor analysis: Application to the comparison of sensory profiles. Food Qual. Prefer. 14, 397-403.
29. Lelièvre, M., Chollet, S., Abdi, H. and Valentin, D. 2008. What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 697-703.
30. Lê, S. and Husson, F. 2008. SensoMineR: A package for sensory data analysis. J. Sensory Studies 23, 14-25.
31. Lê, S., Josse, J. and Husson, F. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Soft. 25, 1-18.
32. Louw, L., Malherbe, S., Naes, T., Lambrechts, M., Rensburg, P. and Nieuwoudt, H. 2013. Validation of two Napping techniques as rapid sensory screening tools for high alcohol products. Food Qual. Prefer. 30, 192-201.
33. Meilgaard, M.C., Civille, G.V. and Carr, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
34. Moussaoui, K.A. and Varela, P. 2010. Exploring consumer product profiling techniques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 1088-1099.
35. Murray, J.M., Delahunty, C.M. and Baxter, I.A. 2001. Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Res. Int. 34, 461-471.
36. Nestrud, M.A. and Lawless, H.T. 2008. Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 431-438.
37. Nestrud, M.A. and Lawless, H.T. 2010. Perceptual mapping of apples and chesses using projective mapping and sorting. J. Sensory Studies 25, 309-324.
38. Pagès, J. 2005. Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley. Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 642-649.
39. Pagès, J., Cadoret, M. and Lê, S. 2010. The sorted Napping: A new holistic approach in sensory evaluation. J. Sensory Studies 25, 637-658.
40. Perrin, L. and Pagès, J. 2009. Construction of a product space from the ultra-flash profiling method: Application to 10 red wines from the Loire Valley. J. Sensory Studies 24, 372-395.
41. Perrin, L., Symoneaux, R., Maître, I., Asselin, C., Jourjon, F. and Pagès, J. 2008. Comparison of three sensory methods for use with the Napping procedure: Case of ten wines from Loire Valley. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 1-11.
42. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
43. Risvik, E., McEwan, J.A., Colwill, J.S., Rogers, R. and Lyon, D.H. 1994. Projective mapping: A tool for sensory analysis and consumer research. Food Qual. Prefer. 5, 263-269.
44. Risvik, E., McEwan, J.A. and Rodbotten, M. 1997. Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food Qual. Prefer. 8, 63-71.
45. Robert, P. and Escoufier, Y. 1976. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Applied Stat. 25, 257-265.
46. Ross, C.F., Weller, K.M. and Alldredge, J.R. 2012. Impact of serving temperature on sensory properties of red wine as evaluated using projective mapping by a trained panel. J. Sensory Studies 27, 463-470.
47. Stone, H., Sidel, J.L., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A. and Singleton, R.C. 1974. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28, 24-33.
48. Symoneaux, R., Galmarini, M.V. and Mehinagic, E. 2012. Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 24, 59-66.
49. Valentin, D., Chollet, S., Lelievre, M. and Abdi, H. 2012. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47, 1563-1578.
50. Varela, P. and Ares, G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Res. Int. 48, 893-908.
51. Veinand, B., Godefroy, C., Adam, C. and Delarue, J. 2011. Highlight of important product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 474-485.
52. Yu, C.H. 2005. Test-retest reliability. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Vol. 3 (K. Kempf-Leonard, ed.) pp. 777-784, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.