Dynamic visualisations and motor skills

Handbook of Human Centric Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 551-580

  Castro Alonso, Juan Cristobal ^a   Ayres, Paul ^b   Paas, Fred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; COGNITIVE LIMITATIONS; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; DYNAMIC VISUALISATIONS; INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS; INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY; TRANSITORY INFORMATION;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 85016047046     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (112)

1. Ambadar Z, Schooler JW, Cohn JF (2005) Deciphering the enigmatic face: The importance of facial dynamics in interpreting subtle facial expressions. Psychological Science 16 (5): 403-410
2. Arguel A, Jamet E (2009) Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2):354-359. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.014
3. Ayres P, Paas F (2007) Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (6):811-820. doi:10.1002/acp.1351
4. Ayres P, Paas F (2007) Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (6):695-700. doi:10.1002/acp.1343
5. Ayres P, Marcus N, Chan C, Qian N (2009) Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2):348-353. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.013
6. Baddeley A (1992) Working memory. Science 255 (5044):556-559
7. Baddeley A (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):417-423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
8. Baggett P (1987) Learning a procedure from multimedia instructions: The effects of film and practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1 (3):183-195
9. Barsalou LW (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (1):617-645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
10. Barsalou LW (2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):716-724. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
11. Bassili JN (1978) Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (3):373-379. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.3.373
12. Betrancourt M (2005) The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 287-296
13. Betrancourt M, Chassot A (2008) Making sense of animation: How do children explore multimedia instruction? In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 141-164
14. Blandin Y, Lhuisset L, Proteau L (1999) Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 52 (4):957-979. doi:10.1080/713755856
15. Boucheix J-M (2008) Young learners' control of technical animations. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 208-234
16. Boucheix J-M, Lowe RK (2010) An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction 20 (2):123-135. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015
17. Brunken R, Steinbacher S, Plass JL, Leutner D (2002) Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. Experimental Psychology 49 (2):109-119. doi:10.1027//1618-3169.49.2.109
18. Carroll WR, Bandura A (1982) The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior 14 (2): 153-167
19. Chandler P, Sweller J (1996) Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 (2):151-170
20. Clark J, Paivio A (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review 3 (3):149-210. doi:10.1007/bf01320076
21. Clark RC (2005) Multimedia learning in e-courses. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 589-616
22. Cowan N (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (01):87-114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
23. Cross ES, Hamilton AFC, Grafton ST (2006) Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers. Neurolmage 31 (3):1257-1267. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.033
24. de Koning BB, Tabbers HK (2011) Facilitating understanding of movements in dynamic visualizations: An embodied perspective. Educational Psychology Review 23 (4):501-521. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9173-8
25. de Koning BB, Tabbers HK, Rikers RMJP, Paas F (2009) Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review 21 (2):113-140. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
26. de Koning BB, Tabbers HK, Rikers RMJP, Paas F (2010) Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education 55 (2):681-691. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.027
27. di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (1992) Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 91 (1):176-180. doi:10.1007/bf00230027
28. Doody SG, Bird AM, Ross D (1985) The effect of auditory and visual models on acquisition of a timing task. Human Movement Science 4 (4):271-281. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(85)90014-4
29. Dowrick PW (1991) Analyzing and documenting. In: Dowrick PW (ed) Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp 30-48
30. Dowrick PW (1991) Instructing and informing. In: Dowrick PW (ed) Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp 49-63
31. Dowrick PW (1991) Feedback and self-confrontation. In: Dowrick PW (ed) Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp 92-108
32. Dowrick PW, Hood M (1981) Comparison of self-modeling and small cash incentives in a sheltered workshop. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (3):394-397
33. Dowrick PW, Jesdale DC (1991) Modeling. In: Dowrick PW (ed) Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp 64-76
34. Geary DC (2002) Principles of evolutionary educational psychology. Learning and Individual Differences 12 (4):317-345. doi:10.1016/s1041-6080(02)00046-8
35. Gray JT, Neisser U, Shapiro BA, Kouns S (1991) Observational learning of ballet sequences: The role of kinematic information. Ecological Psychology 3 (2):121-134. doi:10.1207/s!5326969eco0304
36. Hall EG, Erffmeyer ES (1983) The effect of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal with videotaped modeling on free throw accuracy of intercollegiate female basketball players. Journal of Sport Psychology 5 (3):343-346
37. Hari R, Forss N, Avikainen S, Kirveskari E, Salenius S, Rizzolatti G (1998) Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: A neuromagnetic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95 (25):15061-15065
38. Hasler BS, Kersten B, Sweller J (2007) Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (6):713-729. doi:10.1002/acp.1345
39. Hegarty M (1992) Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 (5):1084-1102. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1084
40. Hegarty M (2005) Multimedia learning about physical systems. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 447-465
41. Hegarty M, Kriz S (2008) Effects of knowledge and spatial ability on learning from animation. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 3-29
42. Höffler TN (2010) Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations-a metaanalytic review. Educational Psychology Review 22 (3):245-269. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7
43. Höffler TN, Leutner D (2007) Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 17 (6):722-738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
44. Höffler TN, Schwartz RN (2011) Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education 57 (2):1716-1726. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.012
45. Huk T, Steinke M, Floto C (2010) The educational value of visual cues and 3D- representational format in a computer animation under restricted and realistic conditions. Instructional Science 38 (5):455-469. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9116-7
46. Jamet E, Gavota M, Quaireau C (2008) Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 18 (2):135-145. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.011
47. Kalyuga S (2009) Managing cognitive load in adaptive multimedia learning. IGI Global, Hershey, PA
48. Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Sweller J (1999) Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 (4):351-371
49. Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 13 (6):522-525. doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00165-9
50. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE (2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem- based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41 (2):75-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep41021
51. Kitsantas A, Zimmerman BJ, Cleary T (2000) The role of observation and emulation in the development of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (4):811-817. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.811
52. Knippels M-CPJ, Severiens SE, Klop T (2009) Education through fiction: Acquiring opinionforming skills in the context of genomics. International Journal of Science Education 31 (15):2057-2083. doi:10.1080/09500690802345888
53. Koroghlanian C, Klein JD (2004) The effect of audio and animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 (1):23-46
54. Kozma R, Russell J (2005) Multimedia learning of chemistry. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 409-428
55. Lin L, Atkinson RK (2011) Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers & Education 56 (3):650-658. doi :10.1016/j. compedu.2010.10.007
56. Linek SB, Gerjets P, Scheiter K (2010) The speaker/gender effect: Does the speaker's gender matter when presenting auditory text in multimedia messages? Instructional Science 38 (5):503-521. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9115-8
57. Longcamp M, Tanskanen T, Hari R (2006) The imprint of action: Motor cortex involvement in visual perception of handwritten letters. NeuroImage 33 (2):681-688. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.042
58. Low R, Sweller J (2005) The modality principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 147-158
59. Lowe RK, Schnotz W, Rasch T (2011) Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25 (3):452-459. doi:10.1002/acp.1712
60. Lusk DL, Evans AD, Jeffrey TR, Palmer KR, Wikstrom CS, Doolittle PE (2009) Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation. British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (4):636-651
61. Mayer RE (2004) Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist 59 (1):14-19. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.14
62. Mayer RE (2005) Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 183-200
63. Mayer RE (2005) Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 201-212
64. Mayer RE (2005) Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 169-182
65. Mayer RE (2001) Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
66. Mayer RE (2008) Research-based principles for learning with animation. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 30-48
67. Mayer RE, Chandler P (2001) When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2):390-397. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.390
68. Mayer RE, Hegarty M, Mayer S, Campbell J (2005) When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (4):256-265. doi:10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.256
69. Mecklinger A, Gruenewald C, Besson M, Magnie M-N, Von Cramon DY (2002) Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex 12 (11):1115-1123. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.11.1115
70. Meichenbaum DH (1971) Examination of model characteristics in reducing avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17 (3):298-307
71. Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63 (2):81-97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
72. Moreno R (2007) Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21 (6):765-781
73. Moreno R (2008) Animated pedagogical agents: How do they help students construct knowledge from interactive multimedia games? In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 183-207
74. Moreno R, Mayer R (2007) Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review 19 (3):309-326. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
75. Moreno R, Mayer RE, Spires HA, Lester JC (2001) The case for social agency in computer- based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19 (2):177-213
76. Paas F, Sweller J (2012) An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review 24 (1):27-45. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2
77. Paas F, Tuovinen JE, Tabbers H, Van Gerven PWM (2003) Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 38 (1):63-71
78. Park O-C, Hopkins R (1992) Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional Science 21 (6):427-449. doi:10.1007/BF00118557
79. Peterson LR, Peterson MJ (1959) Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3):193-198. doi:10.1037/h0049234
80. Pramling N (2009) The role of metaphor in Darwin and the implications for teaching evolution. Science Education 93 (3):535-547. doi:10.1002/sce.20319
81. Rebetez C, Betrancourt M, Sangin M, Dillenbourg P (2010) Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science 38 (5):471-485. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6
82. Rieber LP (1990) Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1):135-140
83. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27:169-192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
84. Roncarrelli R (1989) The computer animation dictionary: Including related terms used in computer graphics, film and video, production, and desktop publishing. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
85. Ross D, Bird AM, Doody SG, Zoeller M (1985) Effects of modeling and videotape feedback with knowledge of results on motor performance. Human Movement Science 4 (2):149-157. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(85)90008-9
86. Rummer R, Schweppe J, Furstenberg A, Seufert T, Brünken R (2010) Working memory interference during processing texts and pictures: Implications for the explanation of the modality effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (2):164-176
87. Scheiter K, Gerjets P (2007) Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review 19 (3):285-307. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
88. Schnotz W, Lowe RK (2008) A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 304-356
89. Schnotz W, Rasch T (2008) Functions of animations in comprehension and learning. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 92-113
90. Schunk DH, Zimmerman BJ (1997) Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist 32 (4):195-208. doi:10.1207/s!5326985ep3201
91. Schwan S, Riempp R (2004) The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction 14 (3):293-305. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
92. Sharp G (1981) Acquisition of lecturing skills by university teaching assistants: Some effects of interest, topic relevance, and viewing a model videotape. American Educational Research Journal 18 (4):491-502
93. Spangenberg RW (1973) The motion variable in procedural learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 21 (4):419-436
94. Spanjers IAE, van Gog T, van Merrienboer JJG (2010) A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students' learning. Educational Psychology Review 22 (4):411-423. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
95. Sweller J (2008) Instructional implications of David C. Geary's Evolutionary Educational Psychology. Educational Psychologist 43 (4):214-216. doi:10.1080/00461520802392208
96. Sweller J (2009) Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review 21 (1):11-19
97. Sweller J (2010) Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review 22 (2):123-138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
98. Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas F (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (3):251-296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
99. Sweller J, Ayres P, Kalyuga S (2011) Cognitive load theory. Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. Springer, New York, NY
100. Tai YF, Scherfler C, Brooks DJ, Sawamoto N, Castiello U (2004) The human premotor cortex is 'mirror' only for biological actions. Current Biology 14 (2):117-120. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.005
101. Tettamanti M, Buccino G, Saccuman MC, Gallese V, Danna M, Scifo P, Fazio F, Rizzolatti G, Cappa SF, Perani D (2005) Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2):273-281
102. Tosi V (1993) El lenguaje de las imagenes en movimiento (How to make scientific audiovisuals for research) (trans: Broissin M). 2nd edn. Grijalbo, Mexico, Mexico
103. Tversky B, Morrison JB, Betrancourt M (2002) Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (4):247-262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
104. Tversky B, Heiser J, Mackenzie R, Lozano S, Morrison JB (2008) Enriching animations. In: Lowe RK, Schnotz W (eds) Learning with animation: Research implications for design. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 263-285
105. Valenti SS, Costall A (1997) Visual perception of lifted weight from kinematic and static (photographic) displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1):181-198
106. van Gog T, Paas F, Marcus N, Ayres P, Sweller J (2009) The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review 21 (1):21-30. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9094-3
107. Watson G, Butterfield J, Curran R, Craig C (2010) Do dynamic work instructions provide an advantage over static instructions in a small scale assembly task? Learning and Instruction 20 (1):84-93. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.001
108. Wiley J, Ash IK (2005) Multimedia learning of history. In: Mayer RE (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 375-391
109. Williams R (2001) The animator's survival kit. Faber & Faber, New York, NY
110. Wong A, Marcus N, Ayres P, Smith L, Cooper GA, Paas F, Sweller J (2009) Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2):339-347. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.012
111. Wouters P, Tabbers H, Paas F (2007) Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review 19 (3):327-342. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4
112. Yang E-M, Andre T, Greenbowe TJ, Tibell L (2003) Spatial ability and the impact of visu- alization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education 25 (3):329-349. doi:10.1080/09500690210126784