Learning from animation enabled by collaboration

Instructional Science

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 471-485

  Rebetez, Cyril ^a   Bétrancourt, Mireille ^a   Sangin, Mirweis ^b   Dillenbourg, Pierre ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Animation; Collaboration; Dynamic mental model; Learning; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955415632     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ainsworth, S., & van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-256.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., & Rebetez, C. (2005). Effect of verbalization and self-explanation on learning from multmedia instruction. Paper presented at the Interlearn conference 05, Helsinki (Finland).
4. Bétrancourt, M., Dillenbourg, P., & Clavien, L. (2003). Reducing cognitive load by delivery features in learning from computer animation. Paper presented at the 10th EARLI biennale conference, Padova (Italy).
5. Catrambone, R., & Seay, A. F. (2002). Using animations to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors, 44, 459-511.
6. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
7. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and conceptual approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Bétrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration Load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: research and theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-184). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understandig mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325-360.
13. Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 411-430.
14. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Intructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722-738.
15. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157-176.
16. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualisation during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257-274.
17. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When Learning is just a click away: Does simple interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390-397.
20. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
21. Moore, J. L., & Rocklin, T. R. (1998). The distribution of distributed cognition: Multiple interpretations and uses. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 97-113.
22. Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 279-315.
23. Ploetzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Praier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 103-121). Oxford: Elsevier.
24. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Heidelberg: Springer.
25. Sangin, M., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., & Mollinari, G. (2008). The effect of animations on verbal interaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 394-406.
26. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Making the abstract concrete: Vizualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 9-26.
27. Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156.
28. Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operative learning with animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 245-265.
29. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2008). Functions of animations in comprehension and learning. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 93-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 215-266). New-York: Academic Press.
31. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 57, 247-262.