Visual Perception of Lifted Weight from Kinematic and Static (Photographic) Displays

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 181-198

  Stavros Valenti, S ^b   Costall, Alan ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; LIFTING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WEIGHT PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031064480     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.1.181     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye (Rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1954)
2. Arnheim, R. (1988). Visual dynamics. American Scientist, 76, 585-591.
3. Bassilli, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 373-379.
4. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
5. Bingham, G. P. (1987a). Dynamical systems and event perception: A working paper (Parts I. II, & III) (Tech. Rep.). Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
6. Bingham, G.P. (1987b). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 155-177.
7. Bingham, G. P. ( 1993). Scaling judgments of lifted weight: Lifter size and the role of the standard. Ecological Psychology, 5, 31-64.
8. Bingham, G. P. (1995). Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior, and cognition, (pp. 403-448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bingham, G. P., Rosenblum, L. D., & Schmidt, R. C. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1473-1493.
10. Carello, C., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1988). Static depiction of lifted weight (Tech. Rep.). Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
11. Carello, C., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1991). Conflicting sources of information in depictions of lifted weight. In P. J. Beek, R. J. Bootsma, & P. C. W. van Wieringen (Eds.), Studies in perception and action: Posters presented at the VIth International Conference on Event Perception and Action (pp. 7-11). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
12. Carello, C., Rosenblum, L. D., & Grosofsky, A. (1986). Static depiction of movement. Perception, 15, 41-58.
13. Costall, A. P. (1993). Beyond linear perspective: A cubist manifesto for visual science. Image and Vision Computing, 11, 334-341.
14. Costall, A. P. (1996). Things and things like them: Beyond the picture theory of pictures. In B. Molyneux (Ed.), The cultural life of things: Visual representations in archaeology (pp. 49-61). London: Routledge.
15. Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1977). Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 353-365.
16. Eakins, T. (1894). The differential action of certain muscles passing more than one joint. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 172-180.
17. Freyd, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575-581.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1966a). A theory of pictorial perception. In G. Kepes (Ed.), Sign, image, symbol (pp. 92-107). New York: George Braziller.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1966b). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1971). The information available in pictures. Leonardo, 4, 27-35.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)
22. Goodrich, L. (1933). Thomas Eakins: His life and work. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art.
23. Gray, J. T., Neisser, U., Shapiro, B. A., & Kouns, S. (1991). Observational learning of ballet sequences: The role of kinematic information. Ecological Psychology, 3, 121-134.
24. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
26. Hendricks, G. (1974). The life and works of Thomas Eakins. New York: Grossman.
27. Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 263-294.
28. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
29. Jones, L. A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: Theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 29-42.
30. Jussim, E. (1983). Frederic Remington, the camera and the Old West. Fort Worth, TX: Amon Carter Museum.
31. Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.
32. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)
33. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Eye and mind (C. Dallery, Trans.). In J. M. Edie (Ed.), Maurice Merleau-Ponty: The primacy of perception, and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics (pp. 159-190). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1961)
34. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. London: Methuen.
35. Michotte, A., & Thinès, G. (1991). La causalite perceptive [Perceived causality]. In G. Thinès, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 66-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1963)
36. Muybridge, E. (1955). The human figure in motion. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1901)
37. Muybridge, E. (1957). Animals in motion. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1899)
38. Myers, J. (1979). Fundamentals of experimental design (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. Newtson, D. (1980). An interactionalist perspective on social knowing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 520-531.
40. Newtson, D. (1990). Alternatives to representation or alternative representations: Comments on the ecological approach. Contemporary- Social Psychology, 14, 163-174.
41. Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., & Cutino, S. (1987). The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5, 191-237.
42. Porter, F. (1959). Thomas Eakins. New York: George Braziller.
43. Rosenblum, L. D., Saldaña, H. M., & Carello, C. (1993). Dynamical constraints on pictorial action lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 381-396.
44. Rosenzweig, P. D. (1977). The Thomas Eakins collection of the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Washington. DC: Smithsonian Institution.
45. Runeson, S. (1983). On visual perception of dynamic events. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studio Psychologica Upsaliensia, 9. (Original work published 1977)
46. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740.
47. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
48. Runeson, S., & Lind, M. (1981). S. Ullman's "The interpretation of visual motion": A critical review. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 23, 273-284.
49. Runeson, S., & Vedeler, D. (1993). The indispensability of precollision kinematics for the visual perception of relative mass. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 617-632.
50. Scharf, A. (1974). Art and photography. New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1968)
51. Schendler, S. (1967). Eakins. Boston: Little, Brown.
52. Sewell, D. (1982). Thomas Eakins: Artist of Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art.
53. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264.
54. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. J. (1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379-384.
55. Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist, 45, 938-953.
56. Ward, J. L. (1979). A piece of the action: Moving figures in still pictures. In C. F. Nodine & D. F. Fisher (Eds.), Perception and pictorial representation (pp. 246-271). New York: Praeger.