Corrigendum: The genome of Chenopodium quinoa (Nature (2017) 542(307-312) DOI: 10.1038/nature21370);The genome of Chenopodium quinoa

Nature

Volumn 542, Issue 7641, 2017, Pages 307-312

  Jarvis, David E ^a   Ho, Yung Shwen ^a   Lightfoot, Damien J ^a   Schmöckel, Sandra M ^a   Li, Bo ^a   Borm, Theo J A ^b   Ohyanagi, Hajime ^a   Mineta, Katsuhiko ^a   Michell, Craig T ^a   Saber, Noha ^a   Kharbatia, Najeh M ^a   Rupper, Ryan R ^c   Sharp, Aaron R ^c   Dally, Nadine ^d   Boughton, Berin A ^e   Woo, Yong H ^a   Gao, Ge ^a   Schijlen, Elio G W M ^b   Guo, Xiujie ^a   Momin, Afaque A ^a   Negrão, Sónia ^a   Al Babili, Salim ^a   Gehring, Christoph ^a   Roessner, Ute ^e   Jung, Christian ^d   Murphy, Kevin ^f   Arold, Stefan T ^a   Gojobori, Takashi ^a   Linden, C Gerard Van Der ^b   Van Loo, Eibertus N ^b   Jellen, Eric N ^c   Maughan, Peter J ^c   Tester, Mark ^a   more..

^a KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^f WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEREAL; CHROMOSOME; CROP IMPROVEMENT; FOOD SECURITY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOME; HERB; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MUTATION; PLOIDY; TERPENE;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BEET; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA; COASTAL WATERS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSPOSON; BIOSYNTHESIS; DIPLOIDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE POOL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; POLYPLOIDY;

ACER PENSYLVANICUM; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA;

SAPONIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALTERNATIVE SPLICING; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE POOL; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MUTATION; POLYPLOIDY; SAPONINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 85014835664     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature22384     Document Type: Erratum

References (79)

1. Risi, C. & Galwey, N. W. The Chenopodium grains of the Andes: Inca crops for modern agriculture. Adv. Appl. Biol. 10, 145-216 (1984).
2. Adolf, V. I., Shabala, S., Andersen, M. N., Razzaghi, F. & Jacobsen, S.-E. Varietal differences of quinoas tolerance to saline conditions. Plant Soil 357, 117-129 (2012).
3. Hariadi, Y., Marandon, K., Tian, Y., Jacobsen, S.-E. & Shabala, S. Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 185-193 (2011).
4. Jacobsen, S.-E., Mujica, A. & Jensen, C. R. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Rev. Int. 19, 99-109 (2003).
5. Gordillo-Bastidas, E., Diaz-Rizzolo, D. A., Roura, E., Massanes, T. & Gomis, R. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), from nutritional value to potential health benefits: an integrative review. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 6, 497 (2016).
6. Vega-Galvez, A. et al. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90, 2541-2547 (2010).
7. Massawe, F., Mayes, S. & Cheng, A. Crop diversity: an unexploited treasure trove for food security. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 365-368 (2016).
8. Zurita-Silva, A., Fuentes, F., Zamora, P., Jacobsen, S.-E. & Schwember, A. R. Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): potential and perspectives. Mol. Breed. 34, 13-30 (2014).
9. Lam, E. T. et al. Genome mapping on nanochannel arrays for structural variation analysis and sequence assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 771-776 (2012).
10. Putnam, N. H. et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 26, 342-350 (2016).
11. Palomino, G., Hernandez, L. T. & Torres, E. C. Nuclear genome size and chromosome analysis in Chenopodium quinoa and C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae. Euphytica 164, 221-230 (2008).
12. Kolano, B., Siwinska, D., Pando, L. G., Szymanowska-Pulka, J. & Maluszynska, J. Genome size variation in Chenopodium quinoa (Chenopodiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 298, 251-255 (2012).
13. Maughan, P. J. et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism identification, characterization, and linkage mapping in quinoa. Plant Genome 5, 114-125 (2012).
14. Yasui, Y. et al. Draft genome sequence of an inbred line of Chenopodium quinoa, an allotetraploid crop with great environmental adaptability and outstanding nutritional properties. DNA Res. 23, 535-546 (2016).
15. Li, F. et al. Genome sequence of cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 524-530 (2015).
16. Eilbeck, K., Moore, B., Holt, C. & Yandell, M. Quantitative measures for the management and comparison of annotated genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 67 (2009).
17. Yandell, M. & Ence, D. A beginners guide to eukaryotic genome annotation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 329-342 (2012).
18. Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210-3212 (2015).
19. Kolano, B. et al. Molecular and cytogenetic evidence for an allotetraploid origin of Chenopodium quinoa and C. berlandieri (Amaranthaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 100, 109-123 (2016).
20. Brown, D. C., Cepeda-Cornejo, V., Maughan, P. J. & Jellen, E. N. Characterization of the granule-bound starch synthase I gene in Chenopodium. Plant Genome 8, 1 (2014).
21. Storchova, H., DrabeSova, J., Chab D., Kolar, J. & Jellen, E. N. The introns in flowering locus T-like (FTL) genes are useful markers for tracking paternity in tetraploid Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 62, 913-925 (2015).
22. Walsh, B. M., Adhikary, D., Maughan, P. J., Emshwiller, E. & Jellen, E. N. Chenopodium polyploidy inferences from salt overly sensitive 1 (SOS1) data. Am. J. Bot. 102, 533-543 (2015).
23. Koch, M. A., Haubold, B. & Mitchell-Olds, T. Comparative evolutionary analysis of chalcone synthase and alcohol dehydrogenase loci in Arabidopsis, Arabis, and related genera (Brassicaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1483-1498 (2000).
24. Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151-1155 (2000).
25. Wilson, H. D. Quinua biosystematics II: free-living populations. Econ. Bot. 42, 478-494 (1988).
26. Kolano, B. et al. Chromosomal localization of two novel repetitive sequences isolated from the Chenopodium quinoa Willd. genome. Genome 54, 710-717 (2011).
27. Dohm, J. C. et al. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 505, 546-549 (2014).
28. Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. Jr & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178-2189 (2003).
29. Chab, D., Kolar, J., Olson, M. S. & Storchova, H. Two flowering locus T (FT) homologs in Chenopodium rubrum differ in expression patterns. Planta 228, 929-940 (2008).
30. Pin, P. A. et al. An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330, 1397-1400 (2010).
31. Pin, P. A. & Nilsson, O. The multifaceted roles of FLOWERING LOCUS T in plant development. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 1742-1755 (2012).
32. Kuljanabhagavad, T., Thongphasuk, P., Chamulitrat, W. & Wink, M. Triterpene saponins from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Phytochemistry 69, 1919-1926 (2008).
33. de Geyter, E., Lambert, E., Geelen, D. & Smagghe, G. Novel advances with plant saponins as natural insecticides to control pest insects. Pers. Technol. 1, 96-105 (2007).
34. Kuljanabhagavad, T. & Wink, M. Biological activities and chemistry of saponins from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Phytochem. Rev. 8, 473-490 (2009).
35. Konishi, Y., Hirano, S., Tsuboi, H. & Wada, M. Distribution of minerals in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68, 231-234 (2004).
36. Madl, T., Sterk, H., Mittelbach, M. & Rechberger, G. N. Tandem mass spectrometric analysis of a complex triterpene saponin mixture of Chenopodium quinoa. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17, 795-806 (2006).
37. Mastebroek, D. H., Limburg, H., Gilles, T. & Marvin, H. J. P. Occurrence of sapogenins in leaves and seeds of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J. Sci. Food Agric. 80, 152-156 (2000).
38. Ward, S. M. A recessive allele inhibiting saponin synthesis in two lines of Bolivian quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J. Hered. 92, 83-86 (2001).
39. Mertens, J. et al. The bHLH transcription factors TSAR1 and TSAR2 regulate triterpene saponin biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 170, 194-210 (2016).
40. Laule, O. et al. Crosstalk between cytosolic and plastidial pathways of isoprenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6866-6871 (2003).
41. Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. & Boronat, A. Breaking new ground in the regulation of the early steps of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 17-22 (2015).
42. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
43. Zerbino, D. R. & Birney, E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18, 821-829 (2008).
44. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105-1111 (2009).
45. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
46. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).
47. Gnerre, S. et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1513-1518 (2011).
48. Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18 (2012).
49. Smit, A. F. A. & Hubley, R. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. http://www.repeatmasker. org (2008-2015).
50. Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://www. repeatmasker.org (2013-2015).
51. Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24, 637-644 (2008).
52. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
53. Wu, T. D. & Watanabe, C. K. GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21, 1859-1875 (2005).
54. Cantarel, B. L. et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 18, 188-196 (2008).
55. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589-595 (2010).
56. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+ : architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 421 (2009).
57. Heberle, H., Meirelles, G. V., da Silva, F. R., Telles, G. P. & Minghim, R. InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 169 (2015).
58. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780 (2013).
59. Rice, P., Longden, I. & Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 16, 276-277 (2000).
60. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6a3. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html
61. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156-2158 (2011).
62. Lee, T.-H., Guo, H., Wang, X., Kim, C. & Paterson, A. H. SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics 15, 162 (2014).
63. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
64. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729 (2013).
65. Lyons, E. & Freeling, M. How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J. 53, 661-673 (2008).
66. Revanna, K. V. et al. A web-based multi-genome synteny viewer for customized data. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 190 (2012).
67. Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8, 275-282 (1992).
68. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
69. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639-1645 (2009).
70. Lyons, E., Pedersen, B., Kane, J. & Freeling, M. The value of nonmodel genomes and an example using SynMap within CoGe to dissect the hexaploidy that predates the rosids. Trop. Plant Biol. 1, 181-190 (2008).
71. Wang, Y. et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e49 (2012).
72. Xu, Y. et al. VGSC: a web-based vector graph toolkit of genome synteny and collinearity. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 7823429 (2016).
73. Kawamoto, T. Use of a new adhesive film for the preparation of multi-purpose fresh-frozen sections from hard tissues, whole-animals, insects and plants. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 66, 123-143 (2003).
74. Sud, M. et al. LMSD: LIPID MAPS structure database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D527-D532 (2007).
75. Giavalisco, P., Kohl, K., Hummel, J., Seiwert, B. & Willmitzer, L. 13C isotopelabeled metabolomes allowing for improved compound annotation and relative quantification in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomic research. Anal. Chem. 81, 6546-6551 (2009).
76. Arnold, K., Bordoli, L., Kopp, J. & Schwede, T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22, 195-201 (2006).
77. Kallberg, M., Margaryan, G., Wang, S., Ma, J. & Xu, J. RaptorX server: a resource for template-based protein structure modeling. In Protein Structure Prediction (ed. Kihara, K.) 17-27 (Springer, New York, 2014).
78. Xu, D. & Zhang, Y. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins 80, 1715-1735 (2012).
79. Holm, L. & Rosenstrom, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545-W549 (2010).