Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 185-193

  Hariadi, Yuda ^a,b   Marandon, Karl ^c   Tian, Yu ^d   Jacobsen, Sven Erik ^e   Shabala, Sergey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JEMBER   (Indonesia)

^c INSTITUT POLYTECHNIQUE LASALLE BEAUVAIS   (France)

^d NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Halophyte; ion loading; membrane transport; osmotic adjustment; potassium; salt stress; sequestration; sodium

Indexed keywords

POTASSIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; OSMOSIS; PLANT ROOT; SALINITY;

BIOMASS; CHENOPODIUM QUINOA; OSMOSIS; PLANT ROOTS; POTASSIUM; SALINITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

CHENOPODIUM QUINOA;

EID: 78649846906     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq257     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beilby MJ, Shepherd VA. 2001. Modeling the current-voltage characteristics of charophyte membranes. II. The effect of salinity on membranes of Lamprothamnium papulosum. Journal of Membrane Biology 181, 77-89.
2. Bisson MA, Kirst GO. 1980. Lamprothamnium, a euryhaline charophyte. 1. Osmotic relations and membrane-potential at steady-state. Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 1223-1235.
3. Blumwald E. 2000. Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 12, 431-434.
4. Bohnert HJ, Shen B. 1999. Transformation and compatible solutes. Scientia Horticulturae 78, 237-260.
5. Chen THH, Murata N. 2002. Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 250-257.
6. + homeostasis in salt-stressed barley. Plant Physiology 145, 1714-1725.
7. Chen ZH, Zhou MX, Newman IA, Mendham NJ, Zhang GP, Shabala S. 2007a. Potassium and sodium relations in salinised barley tissues as a basis of differential salt tolerance. Functional Plant Biology 34, 150-162.
8. Cuin TA, Shabala S. 2005. Exogenously supplied compatible solutes rapidly ameliorate NaCl-induced potassium efflux from barley roots. Plant and Cell Physiology 46, 1924-1933.
9. Cuin TA, Shabala S. 2007. Amino acids regulate salinity-induced potassium efflux in barley root epidermis. Planta 225, 753-761.
10. Cuin TA, Tian Y, Betts SA, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S. 2009. Ionic relations and osmotic adjustment in durum and bread wheat under saline conditions. Functional Plant Biology 36, 1110-1119.
11. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179, 945-963.
12. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA. 2001. Salinity tolerance in Hordeum vulgare: ion concentrations in root cells of cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant and Soil 231, 1-9.
13. Flowers TJ, Yeo AR. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 875-884.
14. Genc Y, McDonald GK, Tester M. 2007. Reassessment of tissue Na+ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 30, 1486-1498.
15. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Biology 51, 463-499.
16. Inan G, Zhang Q, Li PH, et al. 2004. Salt cress. A halophyte and cryophyte Arabidopsis relative model system and its applicability to molecular genetic analyses of growth and development of extremophiles. Plant Physiology 135, 1718-1737.
17. Jacobsen SE, Liu F, Jensen CR. 2009. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Scientia Horticulturae 122, 281-287.
18. Jacobsen SE, Quispe H, Mujica A. 2001. Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. In: Scientists and farmer-partners in research for the 21st century. CIP Program Report 1999-2000, 403-408.
19. Jacobsen SE, Monteros C, Corcuera LJ, Bravo LA, Christiansen JL, Mujica A. 2007. Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). European Journal of Agronomy 26, 471-475.
20. Jacobsen SE, Mujica A, Jensen CR. 2003. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International 19, 99-109.
21. - in salt-affected barley and durum wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 29, 2185-2197.
22. Jensen CR, Jacobsen SE, Andersen MN, Núńez N, Andersen SD, Rasmussen L, Mogensen VO. 2000. Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. European Journal of Agronomy 13, 11-25.
23. Koyro HW, Eisa SS. 2008. Effect of salinity on composition, viability and germination of seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Plant and Soil 302, 79-90.
24. Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.
25. Maughan PJ, Turner TB, Coleman CE, Elzinga DB, Jellen EN, Morales JA, Udall JA, Fairbanks DJ, Bonifacio A. 2009. Characterization of Salt Overly Sensitive 1 (SOS 1) gene homoeologs in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wilid.). Genome 52, 647-657.
26. Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 25, 239-250.
27. Munns R, Hare RA, James RA, Rebetzke GJ. 2000. Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 69-74.
28. Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 651-681.
29. Raven JA. 1985. Regulation of pH and generation of osmolarity in vascular plants: a cost-benefit analysis in relation to efficiency of use of energy, nitrogen and water. New Phytologist 101, 25-77.
30. Rivelli AR, James RA, Munns R, Condon AG. 2002. Effect of salinity on water relations and growth of wheat genotypes with contrasting sodium uptake. Functional Plant Biology 29, 1065-1074.
31. Rosa M, Hilal M, Gonzalez JA, Prado FE. 2009. Low-temperature effect on enzyme activities involved in sucrose-starch partitioning in salt-stressed and salt-acclimated cotyledons of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seedlings. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 47, 300-307.
32. Ruffino AMC, Rosa M, Hilal M, Gonzalez JA, Prado FE. 2010. The role of cotyledon metabolism in the establishment of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seedlings growing under salinity. Plant and Soil 326, 213-224.
33. Sanchez HB, Lemeur R, Van Damme P, Jacobsen SE. 2003. Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International 19, 111-119.
34. Shabala L, Ross T, McMeekin T, Shabala S. 2006. Non-invasive microelectrode ion flux measurements to study adaptive responses of microorganisms to the environment. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 30, 472-486.
35. Shabala S, Cuin TA. 2008. Potassium transport and plant salt tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 133, 651-669.
36. Shabala S, Newman I, Wilson S, Clark R. 2000. Nutrient uptake patterns over the surface of germinating wheat seeds. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 89-97.
37. Shabala S, Shabala L. 2002. Kinetics of net H+, Ca2+, K+, Na+, NH4+, and Cl- fluxes associated with post-chilling recovery of plasma membrane transporters in Zea mays leaf and root tissues. Physiologia Plantarum 114, 47-56.
38. Smethurst CF, Shabala S. 2003. Screening methods for waterlogging tolerance in lucerne: comparative analysis of waterlogging effects on chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthesis, biomass and chlorophyll content. Functional Plant Biology 30, 335-343.
39. Tegg RS, Melian L, Wilson CR, Shabala S. 2005. Plant cell growth and ion flux responses to the streptomycete phytotoxin thaxtomin A: calcium and hydrogen flux patterns revealed by the non-invasive MIFE technique. Plant and Cell Physiology 46, 638-648.
40. Trognitz BR. 2003. Prospects of breeding quinoa for tolerance to abiotic stress. Food Reviews International 19, 129-137.
41. Vera-Estrella R, Barkla BJ, Bohnert HJ, Pantoja O. 1999. Salt stress in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L cell suspensions activates adaptive mechanisms similar to those observed in the whole plant. Planta 207, 426-435.
42. Yao X, Bisson MA, Brzezicki LJ. 1992. ATP-driven proton pumping in two species of Chara differing in salt tolerance. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 199-210.