The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)

Nature

Volumn 505, Issue 7484, 2014, Pages 546-549

  Dohm, Juliane C ^a,b,c   Minoche, André E ^a,b,c   Holtgräwe, Daniela ^d   Capella Gutiérrez, Salvador ^b,c   Zakrzewski, Falk ^e   Tafer, Hakim ^f   Rupp, Oliver ^d   Sörensen, Thomas Rosleff ^d   Stracke, Ralf ^d   Reinhardt, Richard ^g   Goesmann, Alexander ^d   Kraft, Thomas ^h   Schulz, Britta ⁱ   Stadler, Peter F ^f   Schmidt, Thomas ^e   Gabaldón, Toni ^b,c,j   Lehrach, Hans ^d   Weisshaar, Bernd ^d   Himmelbauer, Heinz ^a,b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^d BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^g Max Planck Genome Centre Cologne   (Germany)

^h JEALOTT S HILL RESEARCH STATION   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ KWS SAAT SE   (Germany)

^j INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL; CHROMOSOME; CROP PLANT; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SUGAR BEET; TAXONOMY; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; ASTERID; BEET; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARYOPHYLLALES; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP; DOMESTICATED PLANT; ENERGY; EUDICOT; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROSID; SEA BEET; SPINACH; SUGAR BEET; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

BETA VULGARIS; BIOFUELS; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ETHANOL; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPINACIA OLERACEA;

ANIMALIA; ASTERIDS; BETA VULGARIS; BETA VULGARIS CICLA; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. MARITIMA; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; CARYOPHYLLALES; ROSIDAE; ROSIDS; SPINACIA OLERACEA;

EID: 84892801409     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12817     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arumuganathan, K. & Earle, E. D. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9, 208-218 (1991).
2. Dohm, J. C. et al. Palaeohexaploid ancestry for Caryophyllales inferred from extensive gene-based physical and genetic mapping of the sugar beet genome (Beta vulgaris). Plant J. 70, 528-540 (2012).
3. Fischer, H. E. Origin of the 'Weisse Schlesische Rübe' (white Silesian beet) and resynthesis of sugar beet. Euphytica 41, 75-80 (1989).
4. Flavell, R. B., Bennett, M. D., Smith, J. B. & Smith, D. B. Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochem. Genet. 12, 257-269 (1974).
5. Biancardi, E., McGrath, J. M., Panella, L., Lewellen, R. & Stevanato, P. in Root Tuber Crops Vol. 7 (ed. Bradshaw, J. E.) 173-219 (Springer, 2010)
6. Stevens, P. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website (2012) http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/research/APweb/.
7. Paesold, S., Borchardt, D., Schmidt, T. & Dechyeva, D. A sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) reference FISH karyotype for chromosome and chromosome-arm identification, integration of genetic linkage groups and analysis of major repeat family distribution. Plant J. 72, 600-611 (2012).
8. Dohm, J. C., Lange, C., Reinhardt, R. & Himmelbauer, H. Haplotype divergence in Beta vulgarisand microsynteny with sequenced plant genomes. PlantJ. 57, 14-26 (2009).
9. Huerta-Cepas, J., Dopazo, H., Dopazo, J. & Gabaldón, T. The human phylome. Genome Biol. 8, R109 (2007)
10. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399-436 (2003).
11. Moore, M. J., Soltis, P. S., Bell, C. D., Burleigh, J. G. & Soltis, D. E. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2010).
12. Hunger, S. et al. Isolation and linkage analysis of expressed disease-resistance gene analogues of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Genome 46, 70-82 (2003).
13. Tian, Y., Fan, L., Thurau, T., Jung, C. & Cai, D. The absence of TIR-type resistance gene analogues in the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genome. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 40-53 (2004).
14. Schneider, K. et al. Analysis of DNA polymorphisms in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and development of an SNP-based map of expressed genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115, 601-615 (2007).
15. Biancardi, E., Panella, L. W. & Lewellen, R. T. Beta maritima: The Origin of Beets (Springer, 2012).
16. Pin, P. A. et al. The role ofa pseudo-response regulator geneinlife cycle adaptation and domestication of beet. Curr. Biol. 22, 1095-1101 (2012).
17. Schnable, P. S. & Springer, N. M. Progress toward understanding heterosisincrop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 71-88 (2013).
18. Hohmann, U. et al. A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of sugar beet and a physical map of the region encompassing the bolting gene B. Mol. Genet. Genomics 269, 126-136 (2003).
19. Lange, C., Holtgräwe, D., Schulz, B., Weisshaar, B. & Himmelbauer, H. Construction and characterization of a sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) fosmid library. Genome 51, 948-951 (2008).
20. Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18 (2012).
21. Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D. & Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578-579 (2011).
22. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
23. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
24. Bao, Z. & Eddy, S. R. Automateddenovo identification ofrepeat sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Res. 12, 1269-1276 (2002).
25. Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, i351-i358 (2005).
26. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder:a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573-580 (1999).
27. Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24, 637-644 (2008).
28. Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genesingenomicsequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955-964 (1997).
29. Lagesen, K. et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100-3108 (2007).
30. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
31. Burge, S. W. et al. Rfam 11. 0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D226-D232 (2013).
32. Brown, J. W. S. et al. Plant snoRNA database. Nucleic AcidsRes. 31, 432-435 (2003).
33. Benson, D. A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D. J., Ostell, J. & Wheeler, D. L. GenBank: update. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D23-D26 (2004).
34. Wang, B.-B. & Brendel, V. The ASRG database: identification and survey of Arabidopsis thaliana genes involved in pre-mRNA splicing. Genome Biol. 5, R102 (2004).
35. Wehe, A., Bansal, M. S., Burleigh, J. G. & Eulenstein, O. DupTree: a program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics 24, 1540-1541 (2008).
36. Guindon, S. et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3. 0. Syst. Biol. 59, 307-321 (2010).
37. Wang, Y. et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e49 (2012).
38. Nei, M. & Gojobori, T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3, 418-426 (1986).
39. Zdobnov, E. M. & Apweiler, R. InterProScan-an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17, 847-848 (2001).
40. UniProt Consortium. Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D71-D75 (2012).
41. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D109-D114 (2012).
42. Tatusov, R. L. et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 41 (2003).
43. Kim, J. et al. A genome-wide comparison of NB-LRR type of resistance gene analogs (RGA) in the plant kingdom. Mol. Cells 33, 385-392 (2012).
44. Hunter, S. et al. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D306-D312 (2012).
45. Young, N. D. et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature 480, 520-524 (2011).
46. Kühn, C. & Grof, C. P. L. Sucrose transporters of higher plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 287-297 (2010).