Evaluating transport externalities of urban growth: a critical review of scenario-based planning methods

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 663-678

  Perveen, S ^a   Yigitcanlar, T ^a   Kamruzzaman, Md ^a   Hayes, J ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment methods; Environmental impact; Integrated land use and transportation models; Scenario evaluation; Scenario generation; Urban growth scenarios

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

ASSESSMENT METHODS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; SCENARIO EVALUATION; SCENARIO GENERATION; SCENARIO-BASED EVALUATION; SCENARIO-BASED PLANNING; TRANSPORT SECTORS; TRANSPORTATION MODEL;

URBAN GROWTH;

COMMUNITY CARE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GAS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 85014032638     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-016-1144-7     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Abdel-Galil RES (2012) Desert reclamation, a management system for sustainable urban expansion. Prog Plan 78:151–206. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2012.04.003
2. Al-shalabi M, Billa L, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Al-sharif AA (2013) Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS-based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana’a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environ Earth Sci 70:425–437. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-2137-6
3. Armstrong JM, Khan AM (2004) Modelling urban transportation emissions: role of GIS. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28:421–433. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00070-4
4. Ayad HM, Saad Allah DM, Abd ElAzeem HS (2012) Investigating urban growth scenarios in Wadi El Natrun area, Egypt, using the UPlan land use allocation model. J Land Use Sci 8:304–320. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2012.667449
5. Aysan M, Demir O, Altan Z, Dokmeci V (1997) Industrial decentralization in Istanbul and its impact on transport. J Urban Plan Dev 123:40–58. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1997)123:3(40)
6. Bailey K, Grossardt T, Pride-Wells M (2007) Community design of a light rail transit-oriented development using casewise visual evaluation (CAVE). Socio Econ Plan Sci 41:235–254. doi:10.1016/j.seps.2006.04.002
7. Banister D, Berechman J (2003) Transport investment and economic development. Routledge, New York
8. Bartholomew K, Ewing R (2009) Land use transportation scenarios and future vehicle travel and land consumption: a Meta-Analysis. Am Plan Assoc J Am Plan Assoc 75:13–27. doi:10.1080/01944360802508726
9. Beardsley K, Thorne JH, Roth NE, Gao S, McCoy MC (2009) Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources. Landsc Urban Plan 93:172–183. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.003
10. Bhatta B (2010) Causes and Consequences of Urban Growth and Sprawl. In: Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data, vol 1st. Springer, DE, pp 17–36. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05299-6
11. Bowman JL, Ben-Akiva ME (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 35:1–28. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00043-9
12. Bracken, I (2014) Urban planning methods: Research and policy analysis. Routledge
13. Brown AL, Affum JK (2002) A GIS-based environmental modelling system for transportation planners. Comput Environ Urban Syst 26:577–590. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00016-3
14. Burke M, Li T, Dodson J (2011) What happens when government workers move to the suburbs?: impact on transport of planned decentralization of employment in Brisbane, Australia. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2255:110–116. doi:10.3141/2255-12
15. Button KJ (1994) Special issue transport externalities alternative approaches toward containing transport externalities: an international comparison. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 28:289–305. doi:10.1016/0965-8564(94)90004-3
16. Cervero R (2006) Alternative approaches to modeling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. Am Plan Assoc J Am Plan Assoc 72:285–295
17. Chakrabarty BK (2001) Urban management: concepts, principles, techniques and education. Cities 18:331–345. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00026-9
18. Chakraborty A, Mishra S (2013) Land use and transit ridership connections: implications for state-level planning agencies. Land Use Policy 30:458–469. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.017
19. Chen T-C, Huang S-L (1998) Towards a symbiosis: urban development and environmental quality in the Taipei metropolitan region. J Environ Plan Manag 41:77–94. doi:10.1080/09640569811803
20. Choe K, Laquian AA (2008) City cluster development: toward an urban-led development strategy for Asia. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong
21. Correia FN, Da Graça SM, Da Silva FN, Ramos I (1999) Floodplain management in urban developing areas. Part I. Urban growth scenarios and land-use controls. Water Resour Manag 13:1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1008097403587
22. Corvalan CF, ebrary I, World Health O (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: a report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. vol Book, Whole. World Health Organization. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
23. Dark SJ, Bram D (2007) The modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) in physical geography. Prog Phys Geogr 31:471–479. doi:10.1177/0309133307083294
24. De Ridder K et al (2008) Simulating the impact of urban sprawl on air quality and population exposure in the German Ruhr area. Part II: development and evaluation of an urban growth scenario. Atmos Environ 42:7070–7077. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.044
25. De Vos J, Witlox F (2013) Transportation policy as spatial planning tool; reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation. J Transp Geogr 33:117–125. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.014
26. Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T (2014) A parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: the MUSIX model. Ecol Ind 41:115–130. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.037
27. Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T (2016) Integrating urban ecosystem sustainability assessment into policy-making: insights from the Gold Coast City. J Environ Plan Manag 59:1982–2006. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1103211
28. Dizdaroglu D, Yigitcanlar T, Dawes L (2012) A micro-level indexing model for assessing urban ecosystem sustainability. Smart Sustain Built Environ 1:291–315. doi:10.1108/20466091211287155
29. Dobranskyte-Niskota A, Perujo A, Pregl M (2007). Indicators to assess sustainability of transportation activities. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra
30. Duque JAG, Panagopoulos T (2010) Urban planning throughout environmental quality and human well-being. Spat Organ Dyn Discuss Pap 4:7–20
31. Dur F, Yigitcanlar T (2015) Assessing land-use and transport integration via a spatial composite indexing model. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:803–816. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0476-9
32. Dur F, Yigitcanlar T, Bunker J (2014) A spatial-indexing model for measuring neighbourhood-level land-use and transport integration. Environ Plan 41:792–812. doi:10.1068/b39028
33. Dutta P, Saujot M, Arnaud E, Lefevre B, Prados E (2012) Uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis during calibration of TRANUS, an integrated land use and transport model. In: ICURPT 2012-International Conference on Urban, Regional Planning and Transportation, vol 65
34. Duvarci Y, Yigitcanlar T, Mizokami S (2015) Transportation disadvantage impedance indexing: a methodological approach to reduce policy shortcomings. J Transport Geogr 48:61–75. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.014
35. Feng X, Zhang J, Fujiwara A (2009) Adding a new step with spatial autocorrelation to improve the four-step travel demand model with feedback for a developing city. Int Assoc Traffic Saf Sci Res 33:44–54. doi:10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60236-3
36. Fertner C, Jørgensen G, Nielsen TS (2012) Land use scenarios for Greater Copenhagen: modelling the impact of the Fingerplan. J Settl Spat Plan 3:1–10
37. Feudo FL (2014) How to Build an alternative to sprawl and auto-centric development model through a TOD scenario for the North-Pas-de-Calais region? Lessons from an integrated transportation-land use modelling. Transp Res Proced 4:154–177. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.013
38. Fotheringham AS, Wong DWS (1991) The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Plan A 23:1025–1044
39. Gärling T, Schuitema G (2007) Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. J Soc Issues 63:139–153
40. Goonetilleke A, Yigitcanlar T, Ayoko GA, Egodawatta P (2014) Sustainable urban water environment: climate, pollution and adaptation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton
41. Gwilliam KM (2002) Cities on the move: a world bank urban transport strategy review. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC
42. Harries C (2003) Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision-making? Technol Forecast Soc Change 70:797–817. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00023-4
43. Haslauer E, Biberacher M, Blaschke T (2012) GIS-based backcasting: an innovative method for parameterisation of sustainable spatial planning and resource management. Futures 44:292–302. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.10.012
44. Hatzopoulou M, Miller EJ (2010) Linking an activity-based travel demand model with traffic emission and dispersion models: transport’s contribution to air pollution in Toronto. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 15:315–325. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.03.007
45. Healey P (2001) Planning theory: interaction with institutional contexts. In: Baltes NJSB (ed) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 11485–11491. doi:10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04432-6
46. Hensher D (2002) A systematic assessment of the environmental impacts of transport policy. Environ Resour Econ 22:185–217. doi:10.1023/A:1015527601997
47. Hu R (2015) Sustainability and competitiveness in Australian cities. Sustainability 7:1840–1860. doi:10.3390/su7021840
48. Hua L, Tang L, Cui S, Yin K (2014) Simulating urban growth using the SLEUTH model in a coastal peri-urban district in China. Sustainability 6:3899–3914. doi:10.3390/su6063899
49. Hunt JD, Kriger DS, Miller EJ (2005) Current operational urban land-use–transport modelling frameworks: a review. Transp Rev 25:329–376
50. Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK (2004) Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore—Washington metropolitan area. Environ Plan 31:251–271. doi:10.1068/b2983
51. Jarke M, Bui XT, Carroll JM (1998) Scenario management: an interdisciplinary approach. Requir Eng 3:155–173. doi:10.1007/s007660050002
52. Johnson RA, McCoy MC (2006) Assessment of integrated transportation/land use models. Information Center for the Environment. Department of Environmental Science & Policy, University of California, Davis
53. Jovicic G (2001) Activity based travel demand modelling: a literature survey. Danmarks Transport Forskning ISSN:1601-0841
54. Jun M-J, Hur J-W (2001) Commuting costs of “leap-frog” newtown development in Seoul. Cities 18:151–158. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00007-5
55. Kahn H, Wiener AJ (1967) The next thirty-three years: a framework for speculation. Daedalus 96:705–732. doi:10.2307/20027066
56. Kamruzzaman M, Baker D, Washington S, Turrell G (2014) Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia. J Transp Geogr 34:54–70. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.002
57. Kamruzzaman M, Hine J, Yigitcanlar T (2015) Investigating the link between carbon dioxide emissions and transport-related social exclusion in rural Northern Ireland. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3463–3478. doi:10.1007/s13762-015-0771-8
58. Kamruzzaman M, Yigitcanlar T, Yang J, Mohamed A (2016) Measures of transport-related social exclusion: a critical review of the literature. Sustainability 8:696. doi:10.3390/su8070696
59. Khodabakhshi S (2013) Density and Sustainable Urban Development. http://www.ecocitybuilders.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Khodabakhshi-Understanding.pdf
60. Kumar DS, Arya D, Vojinovic Z (2013) Modeling of urban growth dynamics and its impact on surface runoff characteristics. Comput Environ Urban Syst 41:124–135. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.004
61. Kwan M-P, Weber J (2008) Scale and accessibility: implications for the analysis of land use–travel interaction. Appl Geogr 28:110–123. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.002
62. Lauf S, Haase D, Seppelt R, Schwarz N (2012) Simulating demography and housing demand in an urban region under scenarios of growth and shrinkage. Environ Plan 39:229–246. doi:10.1068/b36046t
63. Li K, Zhang P, Crittenden JC, Guhathakurta S, Chen Y, Fernando H, Joshi H (2007) Development of a framework for quantifying the environmental impacts of urban development and construction practices. Environ sci technol 41(14):5130–5136
64. Lindgren M, Bandhold H (2009) Scenario planning: revised and updated. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. doi:10.1057/9780230233584
65. Mahbub P, Ayoko GA, Goonetilleke A, Egodawatta P (2011) Analysis of the build-up of semi and non volatile organic compounds on urban roads. Water Res 45:2835–2844. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.02.033
66. Manzo S, Nielsen OA, Prato CG (2015) How uncertainty in input and parameters influences transport model: output A four-stage model case-study. Transp Policy 38:64–72. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.12.004
67. Martínez A, Mirás J (2009) Review essay: the second industrial revolution and urban growth: the impact of transport in Spanish cities. J Urban Hist 35:298–305. doi:10.1177/0096144208327357
68. Mehaffy MW (2013) Prospects for scenario-modelling urban design methodologies to achieve significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Urban Des Int 18:313–324. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.9
69. Mikelbank BA (2010) Quantitative Geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis. Geogr Anal 33(4):370–370. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00453.x
70. Minnery JR (1992) Urban form and development strategies: equity, environmental and economic implications Background papers (Australia. National Housing Strategy), vol 7. Australian Govt. Pub. Service, Canberra. http://nla.gov.au/nla.cat-vn330385
71. Mittal S, Dai H, Shukla PR (2015) Low carbon urban transport scenarios for China and India: a comparative assessment. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.002
72. Morrow E, Park J, Randall E, Sivasailam D, Son D (2013) Linking transportation and land use goals through scenario planning. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2397:22–29. doi:10.3141/2397-03
73. Næss P (2001) Urban planning and sustainable development. Eur Plann Stud 9:503–524. doi:10.1080/713666490
74. Newby-Clark IR, Ross M, Buehler R, Koehler DJ, Griffin D (2000) People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. J Exp Psychol Appl 6:171–182. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.6.3.171
75. Newman P (2001) Planning issues and sustainable development. In: Baltes NJSB (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 11479–11482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04424-7
76. Newton P (2000) Urban form and environmental performance. In: Achieving sustainable urban form, pp 46–53
77. Nguyen D, Coowanitwong N (2011) Strategic environmental assessment application for sustainable transport-related air quality policies: a case study in Hanoi City, Vietnam. Environ Dev Sustain 13:565–585. doi:10.1007/s10668-010-9277-1
78. Oana PL, Harutyun S, Brendan W, Sheila C (2011) Scenarios and indicators supporting urban regional planning. Proced Soc Behav Sci 21:243–252. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.012
79. Openshaw S (1996) Developing GIS-relevant zone-based spatial analysis methods. Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment, pp 55–73
80. Pearman AD (1988) Scenario construction for transport planning. Transp Plan Technol 12:73–85. doi:10.1080/03081068808717361
81. Rocha WP, Delgado MG, Sendra JB, (2011) Simulating urban growth scenarios using GIS and multicriteria analysis techniques: a case study of the Madrid region, Spain. Environ Plan 38:1012–1031. doi:10.1068/b37061
82. Porter DR (1997) Managing growth in America’s communities. Island Press, Washington, DC
83. Pucher J, Zr Peng, Mittal N, Zhu Y, Korattyswaroopam N (2007) Urban transport trends and policies in China and India: impacts of rapid economic growth. Transp Rev 27:379–410. doi:10.1080/01441640601089988
84. Rafiee R, Mahiny AS, Khorasani N, Darvishsefat AA, Danekar A (2009) Simulating urban growth in Mashad City, Iran through the SLEUTH model (UGM). Cities 26:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2008.11.005
85. Ratcliffe J, Krawczyk E (2011) Imagineering city futures: the use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures 43:642–653. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005
86. Ren W et al (2015) Inter-city passenger transport in larger urban agglomeration area: emissions and health impacts. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.102
87. Rikkonen P, Tapio P (2009) Future prospects of alternative agro-based bioenergy use in Finland—Constructing scenarios with quantitative and qualitative Delphi data. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76:978–990. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.12.001
88. Roth NE, Thorne JH, Johnston RA, Quinn JF, McCoy MC (2012) Modeling impacts to agricultural revenue and government service costs from urban growth. J Agric Food Syst Commun Dev 2:1–20
89. Rowe G, Wright G (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecast 15:353–375. doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
90. Schoemaker PJH (1993) Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strateg Manag J 14:193–213. doi:10.1002/smj.4250140304
91. Schroeder MJ, Lambert JH (2010) Scenario-based multiple criteria analysis for infrastructure policy impacts and planning. J Risk Res 14:191–214. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.515314
92. Seo Y, Kim S-M (2013) Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from road traffic: a case study in Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 28:777–787
93. Shearer AW et al (2009) Land use scenarios: environmental consequences of development. CRC Press, Hoboken
94. Shiftan Y (2008) The use of activity-based modeling to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior. Ann Reg Sci 42:79–97
95. Singh YJ, Fard P, Zuidgeest M, Brussel M, Mv Maarseveen (2014) Measuring transit oriented development: a spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen. J Transp Geogr 35:130–143. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.014
96. Smith JW, Floyd MF (2013) The urban growth machine, central place theory and access to open space. City Cult Soc 4:87–98. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2013.03.002
97. Solesbury, W (2013) Policy in urban planning: structure plans, programmes and local plans, vol 8. Elsevier
98. Son H (2013) Alternative future scenarios for South Korea in 2030. Futures 52:27–41. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2013.06.005
99. Song Y, Ding C, Knaap G (2006) Envisioning Beijing 2020 through sketches of urban scenarios. Habitat Int 30:1018–1034. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.10.006
100. Stead D, Banister D (2003) Transport policy scenario-building. Transp Plan Technol 26:513–536. doi:10.1080/0308106032000167382
101. Storch H, Downes NK (2011) A scenario-based approach to assess Ho Chi Minh City’s urban development strategies against the impact of climate change. Cities 28:517–526. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.002
102. Sung H, Oh J-T (2011) Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities 28:70–82. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.004
103. Sushinsky JR, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Gill TK, Fuller RA (2013) How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Glob Change Biol 19:401–410. doi:10.1111/gcb.12055
104. Thapa RB, Murayama Y (2012) Scenario-based urban growth allocation in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Landsc Urban Plan 105:140–148. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.007
105. Thorne JH, Santos MJ, Bjorkman JH (2013) Regional assessment of urban impacts on landcover and open space finds a smart urban growth policy performs little better than business as usual. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065258
106. Tian G, Qiao Z (2014) Modeling urban expansion policy scenarios using an agent-based approach for Guangzhou Metropolitan Region of China. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-06909-190352
107. Timmermans H (2006) Modelling land use and transportation dynamics: methodological issues, state of the art, and applications in developing countries. Discussion Paper Series
108. Torrens PM (2000) How land-use-transportation models work. CASA Working Paper 29
109. Vacík E, Fotr J, Spacek M, Soucek I (2014) Scenarios and their application in strategic planning. E+M Ekon Manag 3:118–135
110. Verburg PH, Rounsevell MDA, Veldkamp A (2006) Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.023
111. Vermeiren K, Van Rompaey A, Loopmans M, Serwajja E, Mukwaya P (2012) Urban growth of Kampala, Uganda: pattern analysis and scenario development. Landsc Urban Plan 106:199–206. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.006
112. Villarreal ML, Norman LM, Boykin KG, Wallace CSA (2013) Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 9:90–103. doi:10.1080/21513732.2013.770800
113. Von Wirth T, Wissen Hayek U, Kunze A, Neuenschwander N, Stauffacher M, Scholz RW (2014) Identifying urban transformation dynamics: Functional use of scenario techniques to integrate knowledge from science and practice. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 89:115–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.030
114. Waddell P (2002) UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Am Plan Assoc J Am Plan Assoc 68:297–314
115. Walz A, Lardelli C, Behrendt H, Grêt-Regamey A, Lundström C, Kytzia S, Bebi P (2007) Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landsc Urban Plan 81:114–131. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.001
116. Wang L, Waddell P, Outwater M (2011) Incremental integration of land use and activity-based travel modeling. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2255:1–10. doi:10.3141/2255-01
117. Wegener M (2004) Overview of land-use transport models. Handb Transp Geogr Spat Syst 5:127–146
118. Wheeler SM, Tomuta M, Haden VR, Jackson LE (2013) The impacts of alternative patterns of urbanization on greenhouse gas emissions in an agricultural county. J Urbanism: Int Res Placemaking Urban Sustain 6:213–235. doi:10.1080/17549175.2013.777356
119. Wegener M (2014) Land-use transport interaction models. In: Fischer MM, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional science. Springer, Berlin, pp 741–758. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_41
120. Wu X, Hu Y, He H, Xi F, Bu R (2010) Study on forecast scenarios for simulation of future urban growth in Shenyang City based on SLEUTH model. Geospat Inf Sci 13:32–39. doi:10.1007/s11806-010-0155-7
121. Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M (2014) Investigating the interplay between transport, land use and the environment: a review of the literature. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:2121–2132. doi:10.1007/s13762-014-0691-z
122. Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M (2015) Planning, development and management of sustainable cities: a commentary from the guest editors. Sustainability 7:14677–14688. doi:10.3390/su71114677
123. Yigitcanlar T, Teriman S (2015) Rethinking sustainable urban development: towards an integrated planning and development process. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:341–352. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x
124. Yigitcanlar T, Dodson J, Gleeson B, Sipe N (2007) Travel self-containment in master planned estates: analysis of recent Australian trends. Urban Policy Res 25:129–149. doi:10.1080/08111140701255823
125. Zhang Q, Ban Y, Liu J, Hu Y (2011) Simulation and analysis of urban growth scenarios for the Greater Shanghai Area, China. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35:126–139. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.12.002
126. Zhang H, Jin X, Wang L, Zhou Y, Shu B (2015) Multi-agent based modeling of spatiotemporal dynamical urban growth in developing countries: simulating future scenarios of Lianyungang city, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:63–78. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0942-z