Land use and transit ridership connections: Implications for state-level planning agencies

Land Use Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 458-469

  Chakraborty, Arnab ^a   Mishra, Sabyasachee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use; Maryland; Model; Scenarios; Statewide; Transit ridership

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMETRICS; ERROR ANALYSIS; LAND USE PLANNING; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL;

MARYLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861003909     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abdel-Aty M.A. Using ordered probit modeling to study the effect of ATIS on transit ridership. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2001, 9(4):265-277.
2. Badoe D.A., Miller E.J. Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2000, 5(4):235-263.
3. BEA, 2011. Bureau of Economic Analysis: Bureau of Economic Analysis:SA25N. Total Full-time and Part-time Employment by NAICS Industry. http://www.bea.gov/ (accessed May 2011).
4. Beimborn E.A., Greenwald M.J., Jin X. Accessibility, connectivity, and captivity: impacts on transit choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1835(1):1-9.
5. Ben-Akiva M., Morikawa T. Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transport Policy 2002, 9(2):107-116.
6. Boarnet M.G., Greenwald M.J. Land use, urban design, and nonwork travel: reproducing other urban areas' empirical test results in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2000, 1722(1):27-37.
7. Boarnet M.G., Sarmiento S. Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban Studies 1998, 35(7):1155.
8. Boarnet M., Crane R. The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2001, 35(9):823-845.
9. Census, 2010. Census Summary Files. http://www.census.gov/ (accessed, May 2011).
10. Cervero R. Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts. Transport Policy 1994, 1(3):174-183.
11. Cervero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1996, 30(5):361-377.
12. Cervero R. Transit-oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(9):2068-2085.
13. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1997, 2(3):199-219.
14. Cervero R., Landis J. Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System: land use and development impacts. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1997, 31(4):309-333.
15. Cervero R., Carroll M., Munkres J., Ketelsen J. Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California 1993, University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
16. Chakraborty A., Kaza N., Knaap G.J., Deal B. Robust plans and contingent plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 2011, 99999(1). 1-1.
17. Chakraborty A. Scenario planning for effective regional governance: promises and limitations. State and Local Government Review 2010, 42(2):156-167. 10.1177/0160323X10377344.
18. Chakraborty A. Enhancing the role of participatory scenario planning processes: lessons from reality check exercises. Futures 2011, 43(May (4)):387-399. 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.004.
19. Cohn H.M., Statistics Canada Factors Affecting Urban Transit Ridership 1999, Statistics Canada.
20. Davies G.W. The effect of a subway on the spatial distribution of population. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1976, 126-136.
21. Deal B. Ecological urban dynamics: the convergence of spatial modelling and sustainability. Building Research and Information 2001, 29(5):381-393.
22. Deal B., Schunk D. Spatial dynamic modeling and urban land use transformation: a simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl. Ecological Economics 2004, 51(1-2):79-95.
23. Du H., Mulley C. The short-term land value impacts of urban rail transit: quantitative evidence from Sunderland, UK. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(January (1)):223-233. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.003.
24. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2001, 1780(1):87-114.
25. Ewing R.H. Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. Urban Ecology 2008, 519-535.
26. Frisken F. The contributions of metropolitan government to the success of Toronto's public transit system. Urban Affairs Review 1991, 27(2):268.
27. Fujii T., Hartshorni T.A. The changing metropolitan structure of Atlanta, Georgia: locations of functions and regional structure in a multinucleated urban area. Urban Geography 1995, 16(8):680-707.
28. Garrett M., Taylor B. Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Social Research in Transport (SORT) Clearinghouse 2003, p. 193.
29. Gómez-Ibánez J.A., Fauth G.R. Downtown auto restraint policies: the costs and benefits for Boston. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1980, 133-153.
30. Heath G., Brownson W.R.C., Kruger J., Miles R., Powell K.E., Ramsey L.T., et al. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 2006, 3:55.
31. Hirsch L.R., Jordan J.D., Hickey R.L., Cravo V. Effects of fare incentives on New York City Transit ridership. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2000, 1735(1):147-157.
32. Holtzclaw J., Natural Resources Defense Council, California Home Energy Efficiency Rating Systems Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs 1994, vol. 11. Natural Resources Defense Council.
33. Horowitz A.J. Simplifications for single-route transit-ridership forecasting models. Transportation 1984, 12(3):261-275.
34. Hsiao S., Lu J., Sterling J., Weatherford M. Use of geographic information system for analysis of transit pedestrian access. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1997, 1604(1):50-59.
35. Ingram G.K. Patterns of metropolitan development: what have we learned?. Urban Studies 1998, 35(7):1019.
36. Kain J.F., Liu Z. Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 1999, 33(7-8):601-624.
37. Khasnabis S., Mathew T.V., Mishra S. A single-stage mixed integer programming model for transit fleet resource allocation. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting 2007.
38. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P.L., Laidet L. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 1997, 24(2):125-158.
39. Kockelman K.M. Travel behavior as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1997, 1607(1):116-125.
40. Krizek K.J. Operationalizing neighborhood accessibility for land use-travel behavior research and regional modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 22(3):270.
41. Kuby M., Barranda A., Upchurch C. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2004, 38(3):223-247.
42. Kyte M., Stoner J., Cryer J. A time-series analysis of public transit ridership in Portland, Oregon, 1971-1982. Transportation Research Part A: General 1988, 22(5):345-359.
43. Landis J.D. The California Urban Futures Model: a new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning B 1994, 21:399.
44. Landis J.D. Imagining Land Use Futures: Applying the California Futures Model 1995.
45. Landis J., Zhang M. The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 2: specification and calibration results of the land-use change submodel. Environment and Planning B 1998, 25:795-824.
46. Levine J., Inam A. The market for transportation-land use integration: do developers want smarter growth than regulations allow?. Transportation 2004, 31(4):409-427.
47. Levine J., Inam A., Torng G.W. A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2005, 24(3):317.
48. Lin J.J., Gau C.C. A TOD planning model to review the regulation of allowable development densities around subway stations. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(July (3)):353-360. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.11.003.
49. Lisco T.E. Value of Commuters Travel Time - A Study in Urban Transportation 1968.
50. Litman T. Transit price elasticities and cross-elasticities. Journal of Public Transportation 2004, 37-58.
51. Mathew T.V., Khasnabis S., Mishra S. Optimal resource allocation among transit agencies for fleet management. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2010, 44(6):418-432.
52. Messenger T., Ewing R. Transit-oriented development in the sun belt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1996, 1552(1):145-153.
53. Miller E., Kriger J.D.S., Hunt J.D. Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land Use Policies: Guidelines for Implementation and Use. 48 1999, Transportation Research Board.
54. Mishra S., Ye X., Ducca F., Knaap G.J. A functional integrated land use-transportation model for analyzing transportation impacts in the Maryland - Washington, DC region. Journal of Sustainability Science Policy and Practice 2011.
55. Mishra S., Mathew T.V., Khasnabis S., et al. Single-stage integer programming model for long-term transit fleet resource allocation. Journal of Transportation Engineering 2010, 136:281.
56. Moudon A.V., Hess P.M., Snyder M.C., Stanilov K. Effects of site design on pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1997, 1578(1):48-55.
57. Murray A.T. A coverage model for improving public transit system accessibility and expanding access. Annals of Operations Research 2003, 123(1):143-156.
58. Murray A.T., Wu X. Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning. Journal of Geographical Systems 2003, 5(1):93-107.
59. Newman P.W.G., Kenworthy J.R. The land use - transport connection: an overview. Land Use Policy 1996, 13(1):1-22.
60. Ong P., Blumenberg E. Job access, commute and travel burden among welfare recipients. Urban Studies 1998, 35(1):77.
61. Peng Z., Dueker K.J. Spatial data integration in route-level transit demand modeling. Seattle City Light's Electrical Usage 1995, 7(1):26.
62. Pickrell D.H. Urban Rail Transit Projects: Forecast versus Actual Ridership and Costs. Final Report 1989, Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA (USA).
63. Polzin S.E., Chu X., Rey J.R. Density and captivity in public transit success: observations from the 1995 nationwide personal transportation study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2000, 1735(1):10-18.
64. Polzin S.E., Pendyala R.M., Navari S. Development of time-of-day-based transit accessibility analysis tool. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2002, 1799(1):35-41.
65. Pucher J. Transit financing trends in large US metropolitan areas: 1973-1978. Transportation Research Record 1980, 759.
66. Puentes R. Flexible Funding for Transit: Who Uses It? 2000, Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
67. Shaheen S., Allen A.D., Liu J. Public transit training: mechanism to increase ridership among older adults. Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board 2009.
68. Smith J.J., Gihring T.A. Financing transit systems through value capture. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 2006, 65(3):751-786.
69. Taylor B.D., Fink C.N.Y. The Factors Influencing Transit Ridership: A Review and Analysis of the Ridership Literature 2002, UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies.
70. Taylor B., Miller D.D., Iseki H., Fink C. Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership using a two-stage least squares regression on a national sample of urbanized areas. 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2004.
71. Taylor B., Miller D.D., Iseki H., Fink C. Nature And/or Nurture? Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Across US Urbanized Areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2009, 43(1):60-77.
72. Thompson G.L., Brown J.R. Explaining variation in transit ridership in US metropolitan areas between 1990 and 2000: multivariate analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1986(1):172-181.
73. Tong C.O., Wong S.C. The advantages of a high density, mixed land use, linear urban development. Transportation 1997, 24(3):295-307.
74. Volinski J., Page O. Part 1: intermodal transfer facilities and ferry transportation: developing bus transfer facilities for maximum transit agency and community benefit. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2006, 1955(1):2-7.
75. Waddell P. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of American Planning Association 2002, 68(3):297-314.
76. Wang G.H.K., Skinner D. The impact of fare and gasoline price changes on monthly transit ridership: empirical evidence from seven US transit authorities* 1. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1984, 18(1):29-41.
77. Wu C., Murray A.T. Optimizing public transit quality and system access: the multiple-route, maximal covering/shortest-path problem. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32(2):163-178.
78. Yoh A.C., Haas P.J., Taylor B.D. Understanding transit ridership growth: case studies of successful transit systems in the 1990. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1835(1):111-120.
79. Zhao F., Wang L., Elbadrawi H., Shen L.D. Temporal geographic information system and its application to transportation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1997, 1593(1):47-54.