Incremental integration of land use and activity-based travel modeling: Workplace choices and travel demand

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2255, 2011, Pages 1-10

  Wang, Liming ^a   Waddell, Paul ^a   Outwater, Maren L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Resource Systems Group Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL MODELS; CHOICE BEHAVIORS; CHOICE MODEL; LAND USE MODELLING; LOCATION CHOICE; MODELING LOCATION; MODELLING SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION: MODELS; TRAVEL DEMAND; WORKERS';

LAND USE;

EID: 84863036812     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2255-01     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kitamura, R., and S. Fujii. Two Computational Process Models of Activity-Travel Behavior. In Theoretical Foundations in Travel Choice Modeling (T. Garling, T. Laitila, and K. Westin, eds.), Pergamon-Elsevier, New York, 1998, pp. 251-279.
2. Pendyala, R. M., R. Kitamura, A. Kikuchi, T. Yamamoto, and S. Fujii. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and Preliminary Validation Results. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123-130.
3. Bhat, C. R., J. Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57-66. (Pubitemid 40748742)
4. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Conceptual Framework. In ALBATROSS: A Learning Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System (T. A. Arentze and H. J. P. Timmermans, eds.), European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2000, pp. 71-80.
5. Arentze, T. A., and H. J. P. Timmermans. A Learning-Based Transportation Oriented Simulation System. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2004, pp. 613-633. (Pubitemid 38688727)
6. Miller, E. J., and M. J. Roorda. Prototype Model of Household Activity- Travel Scheduling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 114-121.
7. Vovsha, P., M. Bradley, and J. Bowman. Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Models in the United States: Progress Since 1995 and Prospects for the Future. In Progress in Activity-Based Analysis (H. J. P. Timmermans, ed.), Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2005, pp. 389-414.
8. Waddell, P. UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation and Environmental Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2002, pp. 297-314.
9. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson. UrbanSim: A Simulation System for Land Use and Transportation. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 43-67.
10. Salvini, P. A., and E. J. Miller. ILUTE: An Operational Prototype of a Comprehensive Microsimulation Model of Urban Systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 5, 2005, pp. 217-234. (Pubitemid 41086377)
11. Moeckel, R., C. Schürmann, and M. Wegener. Microsimulation of Urban Land Use. Proc., 42nd European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Dortmund, Germany, 2002.
12. Hunt, J. D., and J. E. Abraham. Design and Application of the PECAS Modeling System. Presented at 8th Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference, Sendai, Japan, 2003.
13. Simmonds, D. The Objectives and Design of a New Land-Use Modelling Package: DELTA. In Regional Science in Business (G. Clarke and M. Madden, eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2001, pp 159-188.
14. Putman, S. H. Integrated Urban Models. Pion Limited, London, 1983.
15. Echenique, M., A. D. J. Flowerdew, J. D. Hunt, T. R. Mayo, I. Skidmore, and D. Simmonds. TheMEPLANModels of Bilbao, Leeds, and Dortmund. Transport Reviews, Vol. 10, 1990, pp. 309-332.
16. de la Barra, T. Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1989.
17. Waddell, P., G. F. Ulfarsson, J. Franklin, and J. Lobb. Incorporating Land Use in Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 41, 2007, pp. 382-410. (Pubitemid 46039442)
18. Waddell, P., L. Wang, and B. Charlton. Integration of a Parcel-Level Land Use Model and an Activity-Based Travel Model. Presented at World Conference on Transport Research, Berkeley, Calif., June 2007.
19. Waddell, P., L. Wang, and X. Liu. UrbanSim: An Evolving Planning Support System for Evolving Communities. In Planning Support Systems (R. Brail, ed.), Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass., 2008.
20. Beckman, R. J., K. A. Baggerly, and M. D. McKay. Creating Synthetic Baseline Populations. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1996, pp. 415-429. (Pubitemid 126380575)
21. Guo, J. Y., and C. R. Bhat. Population Synthesis for Microsimulating Travel Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2014, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 92-101 (Pubitemid 351561575)
22. Ye, X., K. C. Konduri, R. M. Pendyala, B. Sana, and P. Waddell. Methodology to Match Distributions of Both Household and Person Attributes in Generation of Synthetic Populations. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
23. Bhat, C. R., and S. K. Singh. A Comprehensive Daily Activity-Travel Generation Model System for Workers. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-22. (Pubitemid 30069399)
24. Bowman, J. L., and M. E. Ben-Akiva. Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-28.
25. Wagner, P., and K. Nagel. Microscopic Modeling of Travel Demand Approaching Home-to-Work Problem. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.
26. Alonso, W. Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
27. Mills, E., and B. Hamilton. Urban Economics, 4th ed. Scott, Foresman, and Company, Glenview, Ill., 1989.
28. Waddell, P. Exogenous Workplace Choice in Residential Location Models: Is the Assumption Valid? Geographical Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1993, pp. 65-82. (Pubitemid 23370294)
29. Waddell, P. The Interdependence of Residential and Workplace Choice: Implications of Multiple Worker Households for Residential Mobility and Location Choice. Presented at 42nd Annual Meeting of the North American Regional Science Association International, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1995.
30. Freedman, O., and C. R. Kern. A Model of Workplace and Residence Choice Location in Two-Worker Households. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 27, 1997, pp. 241-260.
31. Clark, W. A. V., and S. Withers. Changing Jobs and Changing Houses: Mobility Outcomes of Employment Transitions. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1999, p. 653.
32. Linneman, P., and P. Graves. Migration and Job Change: A Multinomial Logit Approach. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 14, 1983, pp. 263-279.
33. Gordon, I., and R. Vickerman. Opportunity, Preference, and Constraint: An Approach to the Analysis of Metropolitan Migration. Urban Studies, Vol. 19, 1982, pp. 247-261. (Pubitemid 13274537)
34. Siegel, J. Intrametropolitan Migration: A Simultaneous Model of Employment and Residential Location of White and Black Households. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 2, 1975, pp. 29-47.
35. Simpson, W. A Simultaneous Model of Workplace and Residential Location Incorporating Job Search. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 8, 1980, pp. 330-349.
36. Simpson, W. Workplace Location, Residential Location, and Urban Commuting. Urban Studies, Vol. 24, 1987, pp. 119-128. (Pubitemid 17242974)
37. Merriman, D. Compensation for Commutes in the Land and Labor Markets: Some Evidence from the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1994, pp. 297-324.
38. Abraham, J. E., and J. D. Hunt. Specification and Estimation of Nested Logit Model of Home, Workplaces, and Commuter Mode Choices by Multiple-Worker Households. In Transportation Research Record 1606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 17-24. (Pubitemid 127631867)
39. Waddell, P., C. R. Bhat, N. Eluru, L. Wang, and R. M. Pendyala. Modeling Interdependence in Household Residence and Workplace 10 Transportation Research Record 2255 Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 84-92. (Pubitemid 351190578)
40. Bradley, M., and J. Bowman. A Summary of Design Features of Activity- Based Microsimulation Models for U.S. MPOs. Presented at TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling, Austin, Tex., 2006.
41. Roorda, M. J., E. J. Miller, and K. M. N. Habib. Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Microsimulation Model. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
42. Balmer, M., K. Meister, M. Rieser, K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen. Agent-Based Simulation of Travel Demand: Structure and Computational Performance of MATSim-T. Presented at 2nd TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling, Portland, Oreg., 2008.
43. Weidner, T., R. Donnelly, J. Freedman, J. E. Abraham, and J. D. Hunt. TLUMIP-Transport Land Use Model in Portland-Current State. In Stadt Region Land, No. 81. Institut für Stadtbauwesen und Stadtverkehr, Rheinisch- Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2006, pp. 91-102.
44. Chow, L.-F., F. Zhao, M.-T. Li, and S.-C. Li. Development and Evaluation of Aggregate Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution in Florida. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1931, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 18-27.
45. Bernardin, V. L., Jr., F. Koppelman, and D. Boyce. Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related to Trip Chaining While Controlling for Spatial Competition. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2132, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 143-151.
46. Outwater, M., and B. Charlton. San Francisco Model Validation. Presented at TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling, Austin, Tex., 2006.
47. Puget Sound Regional Council. Household Activity Survey Analysis Report. Cambridge Systematics, Sammamish, Wash., 2007.
48. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978, pp. 75-96.
49. Gliebe, J. P., and F. S. Koppelman. A Model of Joint Activity Participation Between Household Members. Transportation, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 49-72. (Pubitemid 34143815)
50. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
51. Choo, E., and A. Siow. Who Marries Whom and Why? Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 114, 2006, pp. 175-201.
52. Fox, J. T. Estimating Matching Games with Transfers. Working Paper 14382. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., 2009.