Scenario management: An interdisciplinary approach

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 3, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 155-173

  Jarke, Matthias ^a   Tung Bui, X ^b   Carroll, John M ^c  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Requirements engineering; Scenarios; Use cases

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083214     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007660050002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Blanning RW. A decision support framework for scenario management. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on decision support systems, vol 2, Hong Kong, 1995, pp 657-660
2. Carroll JM (ed). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995
3. Filippidou D. Designing with scenarios: a critical review of current research and practice. Requirements Eng 1998;3(l): l-22
4. Rolland C, Ben Achour C, Cauvet C, Ralyte J, Sutcliffe A, Maiden M, Jarke M, Haumer P, Pohl K, Dubois E, Heymans P. A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requirements Eng 1998;3(1): 23-7
5. Weidenhaupt K, Pohl K, Jarke M, Haumer P. Scenario usage in software development: current practice. IEEE Software 1998; March: 34-45
6. Becker HA. The role of gaming and simulation in scenario project. In: Stahl (ed). Operational gaming: an international approach. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Eaxenburg, Austria, 1983, pp 187-202
7. Brown S. Scenarios in system analysis. In: Quade ES, Boucher WE (eds). Systems analysis and policy planning: applications in defense. Elsevier, New York, 1968, pp 298-309
8. Jacobsen I. The use-case construct in object-oriented software engineering. In: Carroll JM (ed). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995, pp 309-336
9. Jarke M, Kurki-Suonio R (eds). IEEE Trans Software Eng (Special Issue on Scenario Management) 1998; December
10. Huber GP, McDaniel RR. Exploiting information technologies to design more effective organizations. In: Jarke M (ed). Managers, micros, and mainframes: integrating systems for end users. Wiley, New York, 1986, pp 221-236
11. deMichelis G, Dubois E, Jarke M, Matthes F, Mylopoulos J, Papazoglou M, Schmidt JW, Woo C, Yu E. Cooperative information systems: a manifesto. In: Papazoglou, Schlageter (eds). Cooperative information systems: trends and directions. Academic Press, New York, 1998, pp 315-363
12. McMenamin SM, Palmer JF. Essential systems analysis. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984
13. Carroll JM, Rosson MB. Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Trans Inform Syst 1992;10: 181-212
14. Jarke M, Pohl K. Requirements engineering in 2001: (virtually) managing a changing world. IEE Software Eng J 1994;6: (5):254-263
15. Ackoff RL. Resurrecting the future of operations research. Oper Res Soc 1979;30(3): 189-199
16. Churchman W. Operations research as a profession. Manage Sei 1970;17(2): 37-53
17. Anton AI, McCracken WM, Potts C. Goal decomposition and scenario analysis in business process re-engineering. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference of advanced information systems engineering (CaiSE 94), Utrecht. SpringerLNCS, 1994, pp 940-104
18. Dardenne A, van Eamsweerde A, Fickas S. Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sei Comput Program 1993;20(1): 3-50
19. Mylopoulos J, Chung E, Nixon B. Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach. IEEE Trans Software Eng 1992;18(6): 483-497
20. Haumer P, Pohl K, Weidenhaupt K. Requirements elicitation and validation with real-world scenes. IEEE Trans Software Eng (Special Issue on Scenario Management) 1998;24(12):1036-1054
21. Rolland C, Ben Achour C. Guiding the construction of textual use case specifications. Data Knowl Eng 1997;25( 1/2): 125-160
22. Sutcliffe A, Maiden NAM, Minocha S, Manuel D. Supporting scenario-based requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Software Eng (Special Issue on Scenario Management) 1998;24(12): 1072-1088
23. Heymans P, Dubois E. Scenario-based techniques for supporting the elaboration and the validation of formal requirements. Requirements Eng 1998;3(3/4): 202-218
24. Kyng M. Creating contexts for design. In: Carroll JM (ed). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995, pp 85-107
25. Carroll JM, Rosson MB. Human-computer interaction scenarios as a design representation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol II, Kona, HI, 1990, pp 555-561
26. Carroll JM. Five reasons for scenario-based design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Wailea, HI, 1999
27. Mills CW. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, New York, 1959
28. Medin DE, Schaffer MM. A context theory of classification learning. Psychol Rev 1978;85: 207-238
29. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray W, Johnson D, Boyes-Braem P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 1976;7: 573-605
30. Wertheimer M. Eaws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis WD (ed). A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology. Paul, Trench, Trubner, London, 1938
31. Freud S. The interpretation of dreams (standard edn), vol IV. Hogarth, London, 1900
32. Lévi-Strauss C. Structural anthropology. Anchor Books, Garden City, NY, 1967
33. Propp V. Morphology of the folktale. Mouton, The Hague, 1958 (originally published in 1928)
34. Haviland SE, Clark HH. What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 1974; 13: 512-521
35. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Subjective probability: a judgement of representativeness. Cogn Psychol 1972;3: 430-454
36. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgements under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185: 1124-1131
37. Jarke M, Mylopoulos J, Schmidt JW, Vassiliou Y. DAIDA: an environment for evolving information systems. ACM Trans Inform Syst 1992;10(1): 1-50
38. Hsia P, Samuel J, Gao J, Kung D, Toyoshima Y, Chen C. Formal approach to scenario analysis. IEEE Software 1994; March: 33-41
39. v. Lamsweerde A, Willemet L. Inferring declarative requirements specifications from operational scenarios. IEEE Trans Software Eng (Special Issue on Scenario Management) 1998;24(12): 1089-1114
40. Kurki-Suonio R. Fundamentals of object-oriented specification and modeling of collective behaviors. In: Kilov H, Harvey W (eds). Object-oriented behavioral specifications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996, pp 101-120
41. Lamport L. The temporal logic of actions. ACM Trans Program Lang Sys 1994;16(3): 872-923
42. Pomerol J-C. Artificial intelligence and human decision making. Eur J Oper Res 1997;99: 3-25
43. Raiffa H. Decision analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968
44. Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds). Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1993
45. Tsatsoulis C, Cheng Q, Wie H-Y. Integrating case-based reasoning and decision theory. IEEE Expert 1997; 12 (July): 46-55
46. March JG, Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manage Sei 1987;33: 1404-1418
47. Tversky A, Wakker P. Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica 1995;63: 1255-1280
48. Roy B. Un chainon manquant en RO-AD, les conclusions robustes. Cahier LAMSADE 114, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1997
49. Bui XT, Kersten G, Ma P-C. Supporting negotiation with scenario management. In: Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol III, Wailea, HI., 1996, pp 209-219
50. Wack P. Scenarios: unchartered waters ahead. Harvard Business Rev 1985; September/October
51. Wack P. Scenarios: shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Rev 1985; November/December
52. Sutcliffe A. Scenario-based requirements analysis. Requirements Eng 1998;3(l): 48-65
53. Wirfs-Brock R. Designing objects and their interactions: a brief look at responsibility-driven design. In: Carroll JM (ed). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, 1995, pp 337-360
54. Anthony R. Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 1985
55. Nissen HW, Jarke M. Repository support for informal teamwork methods. In: Eyytinen K, Welke R (eds)., Inform Syst (Special Issue on Meta Modeling and Method Engineering) 1999;24:2
56. Pohl K. The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. Inform Syst 1994;19(3): 243-258