Land use - Transportation scenarios and future vehicle travel and land consumption

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-27

  Bartholomew, Keith ^a   Ewing, Reid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical model; Land use; Meta analysis; Scenario planning; Transportation

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LAND USE; LAND USE PLANNING; META-ANALYSIS; METROPOLITAN AREA; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANNING METHOD; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 65449138323     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360802508726     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. 1000 Friends of Oregon. (1991) Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection: Modeling practices, 1, Author, Portland, OR
2. 1000 Friends of Oregon. (1996) Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection: Analysis of alternatives, 5, Author, Portland, OR
3. 1000 Friends of Oregon. (1997) Making the connections: A summary of the LUTRAQ project, 7, Author, Portland, OR
4. Apple Jr., R. W. (1988) A self-effacing nominee: George Herbert Walker Bush. The New York Times, p. A1.
5. Avin, U. (2007) Using scenarios to make urban plans. Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects, pp. 103-134. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
6. Bartholomew, K. (2005) Integrating land use issues into transportation planning: Scenario planning bibliography., Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation., Washington, DC
7. Bartholomew, K. (2005) Integrating land use issues into transportation planning: Scenario planning summary report., Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation., Washington, DC
8. Bartholomew, K. (2007) Land use-transportation scenario planning: Promise and reality. Transportation, 34:4, pp. 397-412.
9. Bartholomew, K. (2007) The machine, the garden, and the city: Toward an access-efficient transportation planning system. Environmental Law Reporter, 37:8, pp. 10593-10614.
10. Beimborn, E., Kennedy, R. and Schaefer, W. Inside the black box: Making transportation models work for livable communities., Citizens for a Better Environment and the Environmental Defense Fund., Washington, DC
11. California Energy Commission, Oregon Department of Energy, & Washington State Energy Office. (1996) The energy yardstick: Using PLACE+ 3S to create more sustainable communities
12. Calthorpe, P. and Fulton, W. (2001) The regional city., Island Press., Washington, DC
13. Cervero, R. (2006) Alternative approaches to modeling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72:3, pp. 285-295.
14. Coalition for Utah's Future. The history of Envision Utah., Author., Salt Lake City
15. Committee for Determination of the State of the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting. (2007) Metropolitan travel forecasting: Current practice and future direction(Special Report 288), Transportation Research Board., Washington, DC
16. Deakin, E., Harvey, G., Pozdena, R. and Yarema, G. (1996) Transportation pricing strategies for California: An assessment of congestion, emissions, energy and equity impacts., California Air Resources Board., Sacramento, CA
17. DeCorla-Souza, P. (1992) The impacts of alternative urban development patterns on highway system performance. Issue Papers for the 1992 ITE International Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers., Washington, DC
18. DKS Associates, & University of California. (2007) Assessment of local models and tools for analyzing smart-growth strategies., University of California., Irvine
19. Edwards, J. L. and Schofer, J. L. (1976) Relationships between transportation energy consumption and urban structure: Results of simulation studies. Transportation Research Record, 599, pp. 52-59.
20. Envision Central Texas. (2003) Envision Central Texas briefing packet., Author., Austin, TX
21. Ewing, R. (2007) Research you can use: Regional scenario plans and meta-analysis. Planning, 73:3, p. 38.
22. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J. and Chen, D. (2008) Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change, Urban Land Institute., Washington, DC
23. Ewing, R. and Cervero, R. (2001) Travel and the built environment. Transportation Research Record, 1780, pp. 87-114.
24. Ewing, R., Pendall, R. and Chen, D. (2003) Measuring sprawl and its transportation impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1832, pp. 175-183.
25. Georgantzas, N. and Acar, W. (1995) Scenario-driven planning: Learning to manage strategic uncertainty, Quorum Books., Westport, CT
26. Giles, L. (1910) Sun Tzu on the art of war: The oldest military treatise in the world., Project Gutenberg., Champaign, IL
27. Glass, G. V. (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Research, 5:10, pp. 3-8.
28. Godet, M. (2001) Creating futures: Scenario planning as a strategic management tool., Economica., London
29. Gupta, S., Kalmanje, S. and Kockelman, K. M. (2006) Road pricing simulations: Traffic, land use and welfare impacts for Austin, Texas. Transportation Planning & Technology, 29:1, pp. 1-23.
30. Haubrich, J. G. and Meyer, B. (2007) Peak oil., Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland., Cleveland, OH
31. IHS Energy. (2006) Petroleum exploration and production statistics., Author., Geneva, Switzerland
32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007) Climate change 2007: Synthesis report., United National Environmental Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
33. Johnston, R. (2004) The urban transportation planning process. The geography of urban transportation, pp. 115-140. Guilford, New York
34. Johnston, R. A., Rodier, C. J., Abraham, J. E. and Hunt, J. D. (2001) Applying an integrated model to the evaluation of travel demand management policies in the Sacramento region: Year two (MTI Report 01-08), Mineta Transportation Institute., San Jose, CA
35. Komanoff, C. (1997) Environmental consequences of road pricing: A scoping paper., Energy Foundation., San Francisco
36. Lipsey, M. and Wilson, D. (2000) Practical meta-analysis., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
37. Littell, J., Corcoran, J. and Pillai, V. (2008) Systematic reviews and meta-analysis., Oxford., New York
38. McDowell, B. D. (1984) The metropolitan planning organization role in the 1980s. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 18:2, pp. 125-133.
39. Montgomery County, Maryland. (1989) A policy vision: Centers and trails., Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission., Silver Spring
40. Nelson, A. C. (2006) Leadership in a new era. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72:4, pp. 393-407.
41. Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1989) Cities and automobile dependence: An international sourcebook, Gower., Aldershot, UK
42. Ogilvy, J. (2002) Creating better futures: Scenario planning as a tool for abetter tomorrow, Oxford., New York
43. Pas, E. (1995) The urban transportation planning process. The geography of urban transportation, pp. 53-77. Guilford, New York
44. Porter, M. (1985) Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, Free Press., London
45. Raudenbush, S. W. and Byrk, A. S. (2002) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, Sage., Thousand Oaks, CA
46. Ringland, G. (1998) Scenario planning: Managing for the future, John Wiley., New York
47. Ringland, G. (2002) Scenarios in public policy., John Wiley., New York
48. Rodier, C. J., Johnston, R. A. and Abraham, J. E. (2002) Heuristic policy analysis of regional land use, transit, and travel pricing scenarios using two urban models. Transportation Research D, 7:4, pp. 243-254.
49. Sacramento Area Council of Governments. (2004) TALL order regional forum., Author., Sacramento, CA
50. Sacramento Area Council of Governments. (2004) Sacramento Region Blueprint Transportation Land Use Study, Author., Sacramento, CA
51. Sacramento Area Council of Governments. (2007) Special report: Preferred blueprint alternative., Author., Sacramento, CA
52. Sacramento Area Council of Governments. (2008) Regional Report, 8(2), Author., Sacramento, CA
53. Schwartz, P. (1991) The art of the long view., Double Day., New York
54. Smith, E. (2007) Using a scenario approach: From business to regional futures. Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects, pp. 79-101. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
55. Smith, M. and Glass, G. (1977) Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32:9, pp. 752-760.
56. Southern California Association of Governments. (2003) Growth vision interim report., Author., Los Angeles, CA
57. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2003) EPA's smart growth INDEX in 20 pilot communities: Using GIS sketch modeling to advance smart growth, Author., Washington, DC
58. U. S. General Accounting Office. (2007) Crude oil: Uncertainty about future oil supply makes it important to develop a strategy for addressing a peak and decline in oil production., Author., Washington, DC
59. Walters, G., Ewing, R. and Schroeer, W. (2000) Adjusting computer modeling tools to capture effects of smart growth. Transportation Research Record, 1722, pp. 17-26.
60. Webster, F. V., Bly, P. H. and Paulley, N. J. (1988) Urban land-use and transport interaction policies and models: Report of the International Study Group on Land-use/Transport Interaction., Gower, Brookfield, VT
61. Weiner, E. (1999) Urban transportation planning in the United States: An historical overview., Praeger., Westport, CT
62. Wood, J. and Long, G. (2000) Long term world oil supply: A resource base/ production path analysis., Energy Information Administration., Washington, DC
63. Zittel, W. and Schindler, J. (2007) Crude oil: The supply outlook., Energy Watch Group., Ottobrunn, Germany