How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis

Psychological Review

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 245-266

  Kita, Sotaro ^a   Alibali, Martha W ^b   Chu, Mingyuan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Gesture; Problem solving; Spatial representation; Speech production

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; GESTURE; HUMAN; SPEECH; THINKING;

COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; GESTURES; HUMANS; SPEECH; THINKING;

EID: 85013757853     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000059     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Alibali, M. W., Flevares, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 183-193. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/0022-0663.89.1.183
2. Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ cogp.1993.1012
3. Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 169-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2752
4. Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2010). Gesture highlights perceptually present information for speakers. Gesture, 10, 3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ gest.10.1.02ali
5. Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909600 750040571
6. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners' and teachers' gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 247-286. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/10508406.2011.611446
7. Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., & Fujimori, Y. (2011). Gestures in the mathematics classroom: What's the point? In N. Stein & S. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental Cognitive Science Goes To School (pp. 219- 234). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
8. Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22, 1138-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417722
9. Alibali, M. W., Yeo, A., Hostetter, A. B., & Kita, S. (in press). Representational gestures help speakers package information for speaking. In R. B. Church, M. W. Alibali, & S. D. Kelly (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
10. Alibali, M. W., Young, A. G., Crooks, N. M., Yeo, A., Ledesma, I., Nathan, M. J., Knuth, E. J. (2013). Students learn more when their teacher has learned to gesture effectively. Gesture, 13, 210-233. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.2.05ali
11. Annett, J. (1990). Relations between verbal and gestural explanations. In G. E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 327-346). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60654-8
12. Argyriou, P., & Kita, S. (2013). The effect of left-hand gestures on metaphor explanation. In M. Knaff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1762-1767). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
13. Argyriou, P., Mohr, C., & Kita, S. (in press). Hand matters: Left-hand gestures enhance metaphor explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
14. Atit, K., Gagnier, K., & Shipley, T. (2015). Student gestures aid penetrative thinking. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63, 66-72. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5408/14-008.1
15. Bauer, M. I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4, 372-378. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00584.x
16. Beattie, G., & Coughlan, J. (1999). An experimental investigation of the role of iconic gestures in lexical access using the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 35-56. http://dx.doi .org/10.1348/000712699161251
17. Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Teaching moral reasoning through gesture. Developmental Science, 17, 984-990. http://dx.doi .org/10.1111/desc.12180
18. Beilock, S. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21, 1605-1610. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385353
19. Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90007-K
20. Broaders, S. C., Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 539-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539
21. Brooks, N. B., Barner, D., Frank, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014, July). The function of gesture in mental abacus computation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Canada.
22. Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 182-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663 .98.1.182
23. Butterworth, B., & Hadar, U. (1989). Gesture, speech, and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 96, 168-174. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.168
24. Casasanto, D., & Dijkstra, K. (2010). Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition, 115, 179-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11 .002
25. Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 706-723. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1037/a0013157
26. Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures' beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 102-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021790
27. Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2016). Co-thought and co-speech gestures are generated by the same action generation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 257-270.
28. Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90053-3
29. Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gs.3
30. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539
31. Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, cognition and culture meet (pp. 243-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106, 1047-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .cognition.2007.04.010
33. Cook, S. W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2009). Embodied communication: Speakers' gestures affect listeners' actions. Cognition, 113, 98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.006
34. Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 594-610. http://dx.doi .org/10.1080/01690965.2011.567074
35. Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2011). Pointing gestures as a cognitive tool in young children: Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 299-312. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.jecp.2011.04.010
36. de Ruiter, J. P. (1998). Gesture and speech production. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
37. de Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284-311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511 620850.018
38. Driskell, J. E., & Radtke, P. H. (2003). The effect of gesture on speech production and comprehension. Human Factors, 45, 445-454. http://dx .doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.445.27258
39. Efron, D. (1941). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
40. Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S. C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259-1268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1259
41. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of non-verbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98. http://dx .doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
42. Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 153-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A: 1021487510204
43. Freedman, N. (1977). Hands, words, and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal represen-tation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures (pp. 109-132). New York, NY: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0492-1_6
44. Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. The American Journal of Psychology, 111, 43-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 1423536
45. Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 9-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10648-014-9249-3
46. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
48. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). From action to abstraction: Gesture as a mechanism of change. Developmental Review, 38, 167-184. http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.007
50. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.279
51. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action's influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 664-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388764
52. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2016). Gesture, sign and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0140525X15001247
53. Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20, 267-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x
54. Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00395
55. Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9163-9168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710060105
56. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner, S. M. (2005). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234-241. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.tics.2005.03.006
57. Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D., & Chang, C. (1992). Assessing knowledge through gesture: Using children's hands to read their minds. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 201-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690 xci0903_2
58. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
59. Hadar, U., & Butterworth, B. (1997). Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica, 115, 147-172.
60. Hatano, G., Miyake, Y., & Binks, M. G. (1977). Performance of expert abacus operators. Cognition, 5, 47-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010- 0277(77)90016-6
61. Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., Kriz, S., & Keehner, M. (2005). The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 33-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0504_3
62. Hladkỳ, V., & Havlíček, J. (2013). Was Tinbergen an Aristotelian? Comparison of Tinbergen's four whys and Aristotle's four causes. Human Ethology Bulletin, 28, 3-11.
63. Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0022128
64. Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Action attenuates the effect of visibility on gesture rates. Cognitive Science, 38, 1468-1481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs .12113
65. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.495
66. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 245-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.04.003
67. Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2011). Cognitive skills and gesture- speech redundancy: Formulation difficulty or communicative strategy? Gesture, 11, 40-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.1.03hos
68. Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Bartholomew, A. (2011). Gesture during mental rotation. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher & T. F. Shipley, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1448-1453). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
69. Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hands' eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 313-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 01690960600632812
70. Hostetter, A. B., & Boncoddo, R. (in press). Gestures highlight perceptualmotor representations in thinking. In R. B. Church, M. W. Alibali, & S. D. Kelly (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
71. Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 291-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.011
72. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
73. Kang, S., Tversky, B., & Black, J. B. (2015). Coordinating gesture, word, and diagram: Explanations for experts and novices. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 15, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014 .958837
74. Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175-200. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1207/s15327973rlsi2703_2
75. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780 511807572
76. Kirk, E., & Lewis, C. (2016). Gesture facilitates children's creative thinking. Psychological Science. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/095679761667918
77. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. Mc- Neill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162-185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780 511620850.011
78. Kita, S. (2014). Production of speech-accompanying gesture. In V. Ferreira, M. Goldrick, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 451-459). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79. Kita, S., Danziger, E., & Stolz, C. (2001). Cultural specificity of spatial schemas, as manifested in spontaneous gestures. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 115-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Kita, S., & Davies, T. S. (2009). Competing conceptual representations tirgger co-speech representational gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 761-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960802327971
81. Kita, S., de Condappa, O., & Mohr, C. (2007). Metaphor explanation attenuates the right-hand preference for depictive co-speech gestures that imitate actions. Brain and Language, 101, 185-197. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.bandl.2006.11.006
82. Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749- 596X(02)00505-3
83. Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In I. Wachsmuth & M. Fröhlich (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in humancomputer interactions. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 1317, pp. 23-35). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BFb0052986
84. Koedinger, K. R., Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Trade-offs between grounded and abstract representations: Evidence from algebra problem solving. Cognitive Science, 32, 366-397. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1080/03640210701863933
85. Krahmer, E. J., & Swerts, M. G. J. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 396-414. http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.005
86. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.017
87. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88. Lakoff, & R. Núñez. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
89. LeBaron, C. D., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gesture, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Gesture and language (pp. 118-138). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805 11620850.008
90. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Marstaller, L., & Burianová, H. (2013). Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 496-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0365-0
92. Masson-Carro, I., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. (2016). Can you handle this? The impact of object affordances on how co-speech gestures are produced. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31, 430-440. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1108448
93. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
94. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001 .0001
95. Melinger, A., & Kita, S. (2007). Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 473-500. http://dx .doi.org/10.1080/01690960600696916
96. Mol, L., & Kita, S. (2012). Gesture structure affects syntactic structure in speech. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 761-766). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
97. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. The American Journal of Psychology, 117, 411-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4149008
98. Müller, C. (1998). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte-Theorie - Sprachvergleich. Berlin, Germany: Berlin Verlag.
99. Mumford, K. H., & Kita, S. (2014). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development, 85, 1181-1189. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1111/cdev.12188
100. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
101. Novack, M. A., Congdon, E. L., Hemani-Lopez, N., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). From action to abstraction: Using the hands to learn math.Psychological Science, 25, 903-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0956797613518351
102. Novack, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Gesture as representational action: A paper about function. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1145-z
103. Novack, M. A., Wakefield, E. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). What makes a movement a gesture? Cognition, 146, 339-348. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.014
104. Núñez, R., & Marghetis, T. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and the concept(s) of number. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 377-400). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342 .013.023
105. Özçalişkan, Ş., Lucero, C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Does language shape silent gesture? Cognition, 148, 10-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cognition.2015.12.001
106. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(88)90021-4
107. Pine, K. J., Bird, H., & Kirk, E. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gestures on children's lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 10, 747-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00610.x
108. Pine, K. J., Gurney, D. J., & Fletcher, B. (2010). The semantic specificity hypothesis: When gestures do not depend upon the presence of a listener. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 169-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10919-010-0089-7
109. Pine, K. J., Lufkin, N., & Messer, D. (2004). More gestures than answers: Children learning about balance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1059-1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1059
110. Pouw, W. T. J. L., de Nooijer, J. A., van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 359. http://dx .doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00359
111. Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9280.1996.tb00364.x
112. Rimè, B., Shiaratura, L., Hupet, M., & Ghysselinckx, A. (1984). Effects of relative immobilization on the speaker's nonverbal behavior and on the dialogue imagery level. Motivation and Emotion, 8, 311-325. http://dx .doi.org/10.1007/BF00991870
113. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1
114. Sekine, K., Wood, C., & Kita, S. (2016). Gestural depiction of motion events in narrative increases symbolic distance with age. Manuscript under review.
115. Shapiro, L. (2014). Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
116. Singer, M. A., Radinsky, J., & Goldman, S. R. (2008). The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes, 45, 365-386. http://dx .doi.org/10.1080/01638530802145601
117. So, W. C., Ching, T. H-W., Lim, P. E., Cheng, X., & Ip, K. Y. (2014). Producing gestures facilitates route learning. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112543
118. Spencer, R. C. (2003). The role of spontaneous gesture in determining problem solving strategies (Unpublished bachelor's thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
119. Stieff, M. (2011). When is a molecule three dimensional? A task-specific role for imagistic reasoning in advanced chemistry. Science Education, 95, 310-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20427
120. Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF00188849
121. Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gs.2
122. Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 395-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml .2004.01.002
123. Weinberg, A., Fukawa-Conolly, T., & Wiesner, E. (2015). Characterizing instructor gestures in a lecture in a proof-based mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90, 233-258. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s10649-015-9623-1
124. Wesp, R., Hesse, J., Keutmann, D., & Wheaton, K. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. The American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423612
125. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322