The Nature of Gestures' Beneficial Role in Spatial Problem Solving

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 102-116

  Chu, Mingyuan ^a   Kita, Sotaro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Gesture; Mental rotation; Paper folding; Spatial problem solving

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951547470     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021790     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alibali M.W., Heath D.C., Myers H.J. Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:169-188. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2752.
2. Alibali M.W., Kita S., Young A.J. Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:593-613. doi: 10.1080/016909600750040571.
3. Broaders S.C., Cook S.W., Mitchell Z.A., Goldin-Meadow S. Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:539-550. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.539.
4. Carpenter P.A., Just M.A. Spatial ability: An information processing approach to psychometrics. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence 1986, 3:221-253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.J. Sternberg (Ed.).
5. Carroll J.B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511571312.
6. Chu M., Kita S. Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:706-723. doi: 10.1037/a0013157.
7. Chu M., Kita S. Co-speech gestures do not originate from speech production processes: Evidence from the relationship between co-thought and co-speech gestures. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2009, 591-595. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. N.A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
8. Cook S.W., Mitchell Z., Goldin-Meadow S. Gesture makes learning last. Cognition 2008, 106:1047-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010.
9. Della Sala S., Gray C., Baddeley A., Wilson L. The visual pattern test 1997, Thames Valley Test Company, London, England.
10. Ehrlich S.B., Levine S., Goldin-Meadow S. The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42:1259-1268. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1259.
11. Ekstrom R.B., French J.W., Harman H., Derman D. Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests 1976, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
12. Eliot J., Smith I.M. An international directory of spatial tests 1983, NFER-Nelson, Windsor, England.
13. Garber P., Goldin-Meadow S. Gesture offers insight into problem-solving in adults and children. Cognitive Science 2002, 26:817-831. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2606_5.
14. Gibbs R.W. Embodiment and cognitive science 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
15. Goldin-Meadow S., Cook S.W., Mitchell Z.A. Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science 2009, 20:267-272. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x.
16. Goldin-Meadow S., Nusbaum H., Kelly S., Wagner S. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science 2001, 12:516-522. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00395.
17. Hegarty M., Mayer S., Kriz S., Keehner M. The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2005, 5:333-356. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0504_3.
18. Hegarty M., Sims V.K. Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:411-430.
19. Hegarty M., Waller D. A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence 2004, 32:175-191.
20. Hegarty M., Waller D. Individual differences in spatial abilities. Handbook of visuospatial thinking 2006, 121-169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. P. Shah, A. Miyake (Eds.).
21. Hostetter A.B., Alibali M.W. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:495-514. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.3.495.
22. Hostetter A.B., Alibali M.W., Kita S. I see it in my hands' eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22:313-336. doi: 10.1080/01690960600632812.
23. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology 2007, Duxbury, Belmont CA. 6th ed.
24. Humphreys L.G., Lubinski D., Yao G. Utility of predicting group membership: Exemplified by the role of spatial visualization for becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:250-261. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.250.
25. Johnson A.M. Speed of mental rotation as a function of problem solving strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1990, 71:803-806. doi: 10.2466/PMS.71.7.803-806.
26. Kendon A. Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication 1980, 207-227. Mouton, The Hague, the Netherlands. M.R. Key (Ed.).
27. Kita S. How representational gestures help speaking. Language and gesture 2000, 162-185. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011. D. McNeill (Ed.).
28. Kita S., Davies T.S. Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:761-775. doi: 10.1080/01690960802327971.
29. Kita S., Van Gijn I., Van der Hulst H. Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures and their transcription by human coders. Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction 1998, 23-35. Springer, Berlin, Germany, doi: 10.1007/BFb0052986. I. Wachsmuth, M. Fröhlich (Eds.).
30. Krauss R.M. Why do we gesture when we speak?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1998, 7:54-60. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642.
31. Lohman D.F. Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature. (Technical Report No. 8) 1979, Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
32. Lohman D.F. Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence 1988, 4:181-248. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. R.J. Sternberg (Ed.).
33. McGee M.G. Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:889-918. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889.
34. McNeill D. Hand and mind 1992, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
35. Melinger A., Kita S. Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2007, 22:473-500. doi: 10.1080/01690960600696916.
36. Miyake A., Friedman N.P., Rettinger D.A., Shah P., Hegarty M. How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:621-640. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621.
37. Rauscher F.B., Krauss R.M., Chen Y. Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science 1996, 7:226-231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00364.x.
38. Salthouse T.A., Babcock R.L., Mitchell D.R., Skovronek E., Palmon R. Age and experience effects in spatial visualization. Developmental Psychology 1990, 26:128-136. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.128.
39. Schwartz D.L., Black J.B. Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science 1996, 20:457-497. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2004_1.
40. Schwartz D.L., Black T. Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:116-136. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.116.
41. Shah P., Miyake A. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1996, 125:4-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4.
42. Shapiro L. The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass 2007, 2:338-346. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x.
43. Shepard R., Cooper L. Mental images and their transformations 1982, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Shepard R.N., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 1971, February, 171:701-703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
45. Trafton J.G., Trickett S.B., Stitzlein C.A., Saner L., Schunn C.D., Kirschenbaum S.S. The relationship between spatial transformations and iconic gestures. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2006, 6:1-29. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0601_1.
46. Wagner S.M., Nusbaum H.C., Goldin-Meadow S. Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial?. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:395-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.002.
47. Wechsler D. WISC-III manual 1991, Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY.
48. Wexler M., Kosslyn S.M., Berthoz A. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 1998, 68:77-94. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8.
49. Wohlschläger A., Wohlschläger A. Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:397-412. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397.
50. Wright R., Thompson W.L., Ganis G., Newcombe N.S., Kosslyn S.M. Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:763-771. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.763.