Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 147, Issue , 2017, Pages 379-394

  Schäufele, Isabel ^a   Hamm, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alphabet Theory; Attitude behaviour gap; Organic; Sustainable; Willingness to pay; Wine

Indexed keywords

BREWERIES; COMMERCE; MARKETING; SALES; WINE;

ALPHABET THEORY; ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOUR-GAP; ORGANIC; SUSTAINABLE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85013639355     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Ay, J.-S., Chakir, R., Marette, S., Does living close to a vineyard increase the willingness-to-pay for organic and local wine?. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress. Ljubljana, Slovenia, August 26-29, 2014, 2014 http://purl.umn.edu/183075 (Accessed 18 02 16).
2. Barber, N., Taylor, D.C., Deale, C.S., Wine tourism, environmental concerns, and purchase intention. J. Travel & Tour. Mark. 27 (2010), 146–165.
3. Bazoche, P., Deola, C., Soler, L.G., An experimental study of wine consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EAAE International Congress. Ghent, Belgium, August 26-29, 2008, 2008 http://purl.umn.edu/43651 (Accessed 18 02 16).
4. Bazoche, P., Issanchou, S., Brouard, J., Maratray, J., Ginon, E., Evaluating consumers’ sustainable choice of wine: a virtual shop experiment. 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar. Naples, Italy, March 25-27, 2015, 2015 http://purl.umn.edu/202735 (Accessed 22 03 16).
5. Bernabéu, R., Brugarolas, M., Martínez-Carrasco, L., Díaz, M., Wine origin and organic elaboration, differentiating strategies in traditional producing countries. Br. Food J. 110 (2008), 174–188.
6. Bonn, M.A., Cronin, J.J., Cho, M., Do environmental sustainable practices of organic wine suppliers affect consumers behavioral intentions? The moderating role of trust. Cornell Hosp. Q. 57 (2016), 21–37.
7. Brugarolas, M., Martinez-Carrasco, L., Bernabéu, R., Martinez-Poveda, A., A contingent valuation analysis to determine profitability of establishing local organic wine markets in Spain. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 25 (2010), 35–44.
8. Chiodo, E., Casolani, N., Fantini, A., Evaluation of the effects of changes in regulatory policies on consumers perception: the case of designations of origin in the wine common market organisation. Paper Prepared for the EAAE 122nd Seminar. Ancona, Italy, February 17-18, 2011, 2011 http://purl.umn.edu/99590 (Accessed 18 02 16).
9. Christ, K.L., Burritt, R.L., Critical environmental concerns in wine production. An integrative review. J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013), 232–242.
10. D'Amico, M., Di Vita, G., Chinnici, G., Pappalardo, G., Pecorino, B., Short food supply chain and locally produced wines: factors affecting consumer behavior. Ital. J. Food Sci. 26 (2014), 329–334.
11. D'Amico, M., Di Vita, G., Monaco, L., Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites. J. Clean. Prod. 120 (2016), 64–71.
12. Defrancesco, E., Estrella Orrego, J., Gennari, A., Would ‘New World’ wines benefit from protected geographical indications in international markets? The case of Argentinean Malbec. Wine Econ. Policy 1 (2012), 63–72.
13. Delmas, M.A., Grant, L.E., Eco-labeling Strategies: the Eco-premium Puzzle in the Wine Industry. 2008, American Association of Wine Economists Working Papers No. 13 http://purl.umn.edu/37325.
14. Drennan, J., Bianchi, C., Cacho-Elizondo, S., Louriero, S., Guibert, N., Proud, W., Examining the role of wine brand love on brand loyalty: a multi-country comparison. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 49 (2015), 47–55.
15. Dunlap, R.E., van Liere, K.D., The “New environmental Paradigm”. J. Environ. Educ. 9 (1978), 10–19.
16. Dunlap, R.E., van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., Jones, R.E., Measuring endorsement of the new ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J. Soc. Issues 56 (2000), 425–442.
17. EU Commission, Regulation (EU) No 203/2012 of 8 March 2012 Amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 Laying Down Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as Regards Detailed Rules on Organic Wine. EU. 2012.
18. EU, Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs. EU. 2012.
19. Fairtrade Foundation, Fairtrade Wine. 2016 http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/en/buying-fairtrade/wine (Accessed 17 03 16).
20. Feldmann, C., Hamm, U., Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: a review. Food Qual. Prefer. 40 (2015), 152–164.
21. Fernqvist, F., Ekelund, L., Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food – a review. Food Qual. Prefer. 32:Part C (2014), 340–353.
22. Forbes, S.L., Cohen, D.A., Cullen, R., Wratten, S.D., Fountain, J., Consumer attitudes regarding environmentally sustainable wine: an exploratory study of the New Zealand marketplace. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 1195–1199.
23. Forbes, S.L., DeSilva, T., Analysis of environmental management systems in New Zealand wineries. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 24 (2012), 98–114.
24. Fotopoulos, C., Krystallis, A., Ness, M., Wine produced by organic grapes in Greece: using means - end chains analysis to reveal organic buyers’ purchasing motives in comparison to the non-buyers. Food Qual. Prefer. 14 (2003), 549–566.
25. Ginon, E., Ares, G., Esteves dos Santos, Laboissière, Lúcia, Helena, Brouard, J., Issanchou, S., Deliza, R., Logos indicating environmental sustainability in wine production: an exploratory study on how do Burgundy wine consumers perceive them. Food Res. Int. 62 (2014), 837–845.
26. Grebitus, C., Lusk, J.L., Nayga, R.M., Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecol. Econ. 88 (2013), 67–75.
27. Guagnano, G.A., Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Influences on attitude-behavior relationships. A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environ. Behav. 27 (1995), 699–718.
28. Gustafson, C.R., Lybbert, T.J., Sumner, D.A., Consumer sorting and hedonic valuation of wine attributes: exploiting data from a field experiment. Agric. Econ. 47 (2016), 91–103.
29. Jaeger, S.R., Mielby, L.H., Heymann, H., Jia, Y., Frøst, M.B., Analysing conjoint data with OLS and PLS regression: a case study with wine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93 (2013), 3682–3690.
30. Kim, H., Bonn, M.A., The moderating effects of overall and organic wine knowledge on consumer behavioral intention. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 15 (2015), 295–310.
31. Klohr, B., Fleuchaus, R., Theuvsen, L., Sustainability: implementation programs and communication in the leading wine producing countries. Paper Presented at 7th International Conference of the AWBR. Ontario, Canada, June 12-15, 2013, 2013 http://academyofwinebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Klohr-Fleuchaus-Theuvsen.pdf (Accessed 23 05 16).
32. Kneafsey, M., Eyden-Wood, T., Bos, E., Sutton, G., Santini, F.Y., Paloma, S.G., Venn, L., Schmutz, U., Balázs, B., Trenchard, L., Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU: a State of Play of Their Socio-economic Characteristics. 2013 http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC80420.pdf (Accessed 20 06 16).
33. Kwong, L.M.K., Cyr, D., Kushner, J., Ogwang, T., A semiparametric hedonic pricing model of Ontario wines. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 59 (2011), 361–381.
34. Lockshin, L., Corsi, A.M., Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: a review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Econ. Policy 1 (2012), 2–23.
35. Lockshin, L., Hall, J., Consumer purchasing behaviour for wine: what we know and where we are going. Proceedings of the International Wine Marketing Colloquium. Adelaide, Australia, Juli 2013, 2003 http://academyofwinebusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/File-030.pdf (Accessed 20 06 16).
36. Loureiro, M.L., Rethinking new wines: implications of local and environmentally friendly labels. Food Policy 28 (2003), 547–560.
37. Mann, S., Ferjani, A., Reissig, L., What matters to consumers of organic wine?. Br. Food J. 114 (2012), 272–284.
38. Martínez-Carrasco, L., Brugarolas, M., Martínez-Poveda, A., Ruiz-Martínez, J.J., Comparing hypothetical versus non-hypothetical methods for measuring willingness to pay in a food context. Span. J. Agric. Res. 13 (2015), 1–12.
39. Miller, K.M., Hofstetter, R., Krohmer, H., Zhang, Z.J., How should consumers’ willingness to pay be measured? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. J. Mark. Res. 48 (2011), 172–184.
40. Mueller Loose, S., Lockshin, L., Testing the robustness of best worst scaling for cross-national segmentation with different numbers of choice sets. Food Qual. Prefer. 27 (2013), 230–242.
41. Mueller Loose, S., Remaud, H., Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice: a cross-cultural comparison. Br. Food J. 115 (2013), 142–166.
42. OIV International Organisation of Vine and Wine, World Vitiviniculture Situation. 2015 http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/2777/report-mainz-congress-2015-oiv-en-7.pdf (Accessed 18 04 16).
43. Orth, U., Consumer personality and other factors in situational brand choice variation. J. Brand Manag. 13 (2005), 115–133.
44. Pagliarini, E., Laureati, M., Gaeta, D., Sensory descriptors, hedonic perception and consumer's attitudes to Sangiovese red wine deriving from organically and conventionally grown grapes. Front. Psychol. 4 (2013), 1–7.
45. Panzone, L.A., Why are discounted prices presented with full prices? The role of external price information on consumers’ likelihood to purchase. Food Qual. Prefer. 31 (2014), 69–80.
46. Pomarici, E., Amato, M., Vecchio, R., Environmental friendly wines: a consumer segmentation study. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proced. 8 (2016), 534–541.
47. Pomarici, E., Vecchio, R., Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 66 (2014), 537–545.
48. Rahman, I., Stumpf, T., Reynolds, D., A comparison of the influence of purchaser attitudes and product attributes on organic wine preferences. Cornell Hosp. Q. 55 (2014), 127–134.
49. Schmit, T.M., Rickard, B.J., Taber, J., Consumer valuation of environmentally friendly production practices in wines, considering asymmetric information and sensory effects. J. Agric. Econ. 64 (2013), 483–504.
50. Schwartz, S.H., Normative influences on altruism. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10 (1977), 221–279.
51. Schwartz, S.H., Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. J. Soc. Issues 50 (1994), 19–45.
52. Sellers, R., Would you pay a price premium for a sustainable wine? The Voice of the Spanish Consumer. Agric. Agric. Sci. Proced. 8 (2016), 10–16.
53. Sogari, G., Corbo, C., Macconi, M., Menozzi, D., Mora, C., Consumer attitude towards sustainable-labelled wine: an exploratory approach. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 27 (2015), 312–328.
54. Sogari, G., Mora, C., Menozzi, D., Factors driving sustainable choice: the case of wine. Br. Food J. 118 (2016), 632–646.
55. Soosay, C., Fearne, A., Dent, B., Sustainable value chain analysis – a case study of Oxford Landing from “vine to dine”. Supply chain management. Am. Int. J. 17 (2012), 68–77.
56. Stern, P.C., New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56 (2000), 407–424.
57. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T.D., Guagnano, G.A., Kalof, L., A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6 (1999), 81–97.
58. Stern, P.C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., Guagnano, G.A., Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25 (1995), 1611–1636.
59. Strange, T., Bayley, A., OECD Insights: Sustainable Development. Linking Economy, Society, Environment. 2008 http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/environment/sustainable-development_9789264055742-en (Accessed 13 04 16).
60. Szolnoki, G., A cross-national comparison of sustainability in the wine industry. J. Clean. Prod. 53 (2013), 243–251.
61. Szolnoki, G., Hoffmann, D., Consumer segmentation based on usage of sales channels in the German wine market. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 26 (2014), 27–44.
62. United States Department of Agriculture, 2000. National Organic Program. Title 7. Part 205. NOP, in: 65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000.
63. van Tonder, E.M., Mulder, D., Marketing communication for organic wine: semiotic guidelines for wine bottle front labels. Commun. South Afr. J. Commun. Theory Res. 41 (2015), 131–151.
64. Vecchio, R., Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Econ. Policy 2 (2013), 85–92.
65. Wiedmann, K.-P., Hennigs, N., Behrens, S.H., Klarmann, C., Tasting green: an experimental design for investigating consumer perception of organic wine. Br. Food J. 116 (2014), 197–211.
66. Willer, H., Lernoud, J., Current statistics on organic agriculture worldwide: area, producers, markets and selected crops. Willer, H., Lernoud, J., (eds.) The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2016, 2016, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, and IFOAM - Organics International, Bonn.
67. Woods, T.A., Nogueira, L., Yang, S.-H., Linking wine consumers to the consumption of local wines and winery visits in the Northern Appalachian States. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 16 (2013), 181–205.
68. Yang, Y., Paladino, A., The case of wine: understanding Chinese gift-giving behavior. Mark. Lett. 26 (2015), 335–361.
69. Zepeda, L., Deal, D., Organic and local food consumer behaviour. Alphabet Theory. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 33 (2009), 697–705.