Mapping ‘social responsibility’ in science

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 31-50

  Glerup, Cecilie ^a   Horst, Maja ^b  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

political rationalities; responsibility; responsible science; science governance; scientific profession

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013405220     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882077     Document Type: Article

References (154)

1. Abraham, J. 2003. “The Science and Politics of Medicines Control.” Drug Safety 26 (3): 135–143. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326030-00001
2. Abraham, J., and C., Davis. 2005. “Risking Public Safety: Experts, the Medical Profession and ‘Acceptable’ Drug Injury.” Health, Risk and Society 7 (4): 379–395. doi: 10.1080/13698570500390473
3. Abraham, J., and J., Sheppard. 1997. “Democracy, Technocracy, and the Secret State of Medicines Control: Expert and Nonexpert Perspectives.” Science, Technology & Human Values 22 (2): 139–167. doi: 10.1177/016224399702200201
4. Allyse, Megan. 2010. “Embryos, Ethics and Expertise: The Emerging Model of the Research Ethics Regulator.” Science and Public Policy 37 (8): 597–609. doi: 10.3152/030234210X12767691861092
5. Andersen, D., 1999. “Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice.” Danish Medical Bulletin 46 (1): 60–61.
6. Anderson, P. A., and S. D., Boden. 2008. “Ethical Considerations of Authorship.” SAS Journal 2 (3): 155–158. doi: 10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70034-3
7. Anderson, M. S., and J. B., Shultz. 2003. “The Role of Scientific Associations in Promoting Research Integrity and Deterring Research Misconduct: Commentary on ‘Challenges in Studying the Effects of Scientific Societies on Research Integrity’ (Levine and Iutcovitch).” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 269–272. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0013-1
8. Ball, D. J., 2002. “Environmental Risk Assessment and the Intrusion of Bias.” Environment International 28 (6): 529–544. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00061-2
9. Barinaga, M. 2000. “Asilomar Revisited: Lessons for Today?” Science 287 (5458): 1584–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1584
10. Bates, S. R., W., Faulkner, S., Parry, and S., Cunningham-Burley. 2010. “‘How Do We Know It's Not Been Done Yet?!’ Trust, Trust Building and Regulation in Stem Cell Research.” Science and Public Policy 37 (9): 703–718.
11. Baylis, Françoise, and Jason Scott, Robert. 2006. “Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Argument for National Research Review.” Accountability in Research 13 (3): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/03605300600848136
12. Beckwith, J., and L. N., Geller. 1997. “Commentary on ‘the Social Responsibilities of Biological Scientists’ (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).” Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2): 145–148. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0005-7
13. Beckwith, J., and F., Huang. 2005. “Should We Make a Fuss? A Case for Social Responsibility in Science.” Nature Biotechnology 23 (12): 1479–1480. doi: 10.1038/nbt1205-1479
14. Beesley, Lisa G. A., 2003. “Science Policy in Changing Times: Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition?” Research Policy 32 (8): 1519–1531. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00023-4
15. Beggins, David. 1978. “Social Responsibility in Science.” Social Alternatives 1 (3): 54–60.
16. Bloor, D., 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
17. Bosch, X., 2010. “Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice in Europe.” EMBO Reports 11 (4): 252–257. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.32
18. Braun, K., A., Moore, S. L., Herrmann, and Sabine, Könninger. 2010. “Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk: Governmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Government.” Economy and Society 39 (4): 510–533. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2010.510682
19. Brice, J., and J., Bligh. 2005. “Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors’ Responsibility.” Medical Education 39 (1): 83–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02027.x
20. Brouwer, W. 1994. “Taking Responsibility for the Implications of Science.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 14 (4): 192–202. doi: 10.1177/027046769401400402
21. Bubela, T., G., Hagen, and E., Einsiedel. 2012. “Synthetic Biology Confronts Publics and Policy Makers: Challenges for Communication, Regulation and Commercialization.” Trends in Biotechnology 30 (3): 132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.10.003
22. Bubela, T., M. C. Nisbet, R. Borchelt, F. Brunger, C. Critchley, E. Einsiedel, G. Geller, A, et al. 2009. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27 (6): 514–518. doi: 10.1038/nbt0609-514
23. Bulger, R. E., and E., Heitman. 2007. “Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction Across the University.” Academic Medicine 82 (9): 876–878. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909
24. Caelleigh, A. S., 1991. “Editorial: Credit and Responsibility in Authorship.” Academic Medicine 66 (11): 676–677. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199111000-00007
25. Caelleigh, A. S., 2003. “Roles for Scientific Societies in Promoting Integrity in Publication Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 221–241. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4
26. Cain, J. 1999. “Why Be My Colleague's Keeper? Moral Justifications for Peer Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4): 531–540. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0053-2
27. Caveman, A. 2002. “Public Advocacy of Science.” Journal of Cell Science 115 (9): 1777–1778.
28. Cho, M. K., and D. A., Relman. 2010. “Synthetic ‘Life,’ Ethics, National Security, and Public Discourse.” Science 329 (5987): 38–39. doi: 10.1126/science.1193749
29. Claxton, L. D., 2005a. “Scientific Authorship: Part 1. A Window into Scientific Fraud?” Mutation Research–Reviews in Mutation Research 589 (1): 17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003
30. Claxton, L. D., 2005b. “Scientific Authorship: Part 2. History, Recurring Issues, Practices, and Guidelines.” Mutation Research–Reviews in Mutation Research 589 (1): 31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002
31. Cohen, Robin, and Calvin C., Gotlieb. 1989. “Educating Tomorrow's Professionals.” Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2): 193–199. doi: 10.1007/BF00382584
32. Cournand, A. 1977. “The Code of the Scientist and Its Relationship to Ethics.” Science 198 (4318): 699–705. doi: 10.1126/science.910153
33. Danforth, W. H., and D. M., Schoenhoff. 1992. “Fostering Integrity in Scientific Research.” Academic Medicine 67 (6): 351–356. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199206000-00001
34. Davidoff, F., and P., Batalden. 2005. “Toward Stronger Evidence on Quality Improvement. Draft Publication Guidelines: The Beginning of a Consensus Project.” Quality Safety in Health Care 14 (5): 319–325. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787
35. Davies, S., and M., Horst. 2012. “Responsible Innovation in the US, UK and Denmark: Governance Landscapes.” Working Paper. Presented at the responsible innovation conference, Den Haag.
36. Davies, S. C. Glerup, and M., Horst. in press. “On Being Responsible. Multiplicity in Responsible Development.” In Responsibility in Nanotechnology Development, edited by S., Arnaldi, A., Ferrari, P., Magaudda, and F., Marin. London: Springer.
37. De Melo-Martín, I. 2008. “Ethics, Embryos, and Eggs: The Need for More than Epistemic Values.” American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12): 38–40. doi: 10.1080/15265160802559211
38. Douglas, H. E., 2003. “The Moral Responsibility of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility).” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.
39. Drenth, P. J. D., 2006. “Responsible Conduct in Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 13–21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0003-1
40. Durant, J. 1999. “Participatory Technology Assessment and the Democratic Model of the Public Understanding of Science.” Science and Public Policy 26 (5): 313–319. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782329
41. Editorial. 2006. “Beautification and Fraud.” Nature Cell Biology 8 (2): 101–102. doi: 10.1038/ncb0206-101
42. Edsall, J. T., 1975. “Scientific Freedom and Responsibility–Report of the AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility.” Science 188 (4189): 687–693. doi: 10.1126/science.11643270
43. Elshtain, J. B., 2008. “Why Science Cannot Stand Alone.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3): 161–169. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9074-0
44. Ernst, R. R., 2003. “The Responsibility of Scientists, a European View.” Angewandte Chemie (International Edition) 42 (37): 4434–4439. doi: 10.1002/anie.200330065
45. Etzkowitz, Henry, Andrew, Webster, Christiane, Gebhardt, and Branca R. C., Terra. 2000. “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm.” Research Policy 29 (2): 313–330. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
46. Evans, M. 1999. “Bioethics and the Newspapers.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2): 164–180. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.2.164.2529
47. Evans, N. G., 2010. “Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science.” NanoEthics 4 (3): 215–220. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0101-z
48. Evered, D., and P., Lazar. 1995. “Misconduct in Medical Research.” Lancet 345 (8958): 1161–1162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90984-2
49. Fischer, F. 1999. “Technological Deliberation in a Democratic Society: The Case for Participatory Inquiry.” Science and Public Policy 26 (5): 294–302. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782293
50. Fisher, C. B., 2003. “Developing a Code of Ethics for Academics. Commentary on ‘Ethics for All: Differences Across Scientific Society Codes’ (Bullock and Panicker).” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 171–179. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0004-2
51. Fisher, E. 2007. “The Convergence of Nanotechnology, Policy, and Ethics.” Advance in Computers 71 (2007): 273–296. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2458(06)71006-3
52. Fisher, E., and R. L., Mahajan. 2006. “Contradictory Intent? US Federal Legislation on Integrating Societal Concerns into Nanotechnology Research and Development.” Science and Public Policy 33 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.3152/147154306781779181
53. Fleischmann, Martin. 2008. “Reflections on the Sociology of Science and Social Responsibility in Science, in Relationship to Cold Fusion.” Accountability in Research 8 (1–2): 19–54.
54. Flipse, S. M., M. C. A., van der Sanden, and P., Osseveijer. 2012. “Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What Is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 1141–1164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6
55. Forge, J. 2000. “Moral Responsibility and the ‘Ignorant Scientist’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3): 341–349. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0036-9
56. Foucault, M., 1972/2004. Vidensarkæologien. Aarhus: Forlaget Philosophia.
57. Foucault, M., 1976/1998. The Will to Power. The History of Sexuality Volue 1. London: Penguin Books.
58. Foucault, M. 2003a. “Governmentality.” In The Essential Foucault. Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P., Rabinow and N., Rose, 229–245. New York: The New Press.
59. Foucault, M. 2003b. “The Subject and Power.” In The Essential Foucault. Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P., Rabinow and N., Rose, 126–145. New York: The New Press.
60. Frankel, M. S., 2000. “Scientific Societies as Sentinels of Responsible Research Conduct.” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 224 (4): 216–219. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22424.x
61. Guston, D. H., and D., Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (2002): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
62. Heitman, E., and R. E., Bulger. 2005. “Assessing the Educational Literature in the Responsible Conduct of Research for Core Content.” Accountability in Research 12 (3): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217420
63. Heitor, M. 2008. “A System Approach to Tertiary Education Institutions: Towards Knowledge Networks and Enhanced Societal Trust.” Science and Public Policy 35 (8): 607–617. doi: 10.3152/030234208X377371
64. Hellström, T. 2003. “Systemic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation.” Technology in Society 25 (3): 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1
65. Horton, R. 2010. “Science Will Never be the Same Again.” Lancet 376 (9736): 143–144. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61091-4
66. Hugman, R., E., Pittaway, and L., Bartolomei. 2011. “When ‘Do No Harm’ Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups.” British Journal of Social Work 41 (7): 1271–1287. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr013
67. Illes, J., M. A., Moser, J. B., McCormick, E., Racine, S., Blakeslee, A., Caplan, E. C., Hayden, et al. 2010. “Neurotalk: Improving the Communication of Neuroscience Research.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (1): 61–69. doi: 10.1038/nrn2773
68. Irwin, A., 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350
69. Jasanoff, S. 2011. “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 621–638. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2
70. Kirman, Joseph M., 1992. “Values, Technology, and Social Studies.” McGill Journal of Education 27 (1): 5–18.
71. Kitcher, P. 2004. “Responsible Biology.” Bioscience 54 (4): 331–336. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0331:RB]2.0.CO;2
72. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
73. Koepsell, D. 2010. “On Genies and Bottles: Scientists’ Moral Responsibility and Dangerous Technology R&D.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1): 119–133. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9158-x
74. Lancet Editors. 1996. “Dealing with Deception.” Lancet 347 (9005): 843. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91337-9
75. Latour, B., and S., Woolgar. 1979/1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
76. Liska, A. J., 2004. “The Morality of Problem Selection in Proteomics.” Proteomics 4 (7): 1929–1931. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300714
77. Lynch, M. 1997. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. MacKenzie, Catriona, Christopher, McDowell, and Eileen, Pittaway. 2007. “Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research.” Journal of Refugee Studies 20 (2): 299–319. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fem008
79. Macnaghten, P., M. B., Kearnes, and B., Wynne. 2005. “Nanotechnology, Governance and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Science Communication 27 (2): 268–291. doi: 10.1177/1075547005281531
80. Marchant, G. E., and L. L., Pope. 2009. “The Problems with Forbidding Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3): 375–394. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9130-9
81. Martinson, B. C., M. S., Anderson, and R., DeVries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi: 10.1038/435737a
82. McCarthy, E., and C., Kelty. 2010. “Responsibility and Nanotechnology.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 405–432. doi: 10.1177/0306312709351762
83. McLeish, Caitríona, and Paul, Nightingale. 2007. “Biosecurity, Bioterrorism and the Governance of Science: The Increasing Convergence of Science and Security Policy.” Research Policy 36 (10): 1635–1654. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
84. Merton, R. K., 1973. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Miah, A. 2005. “Genetics, Cyberspace and Bioethics: Why Not a Public Engagement with Ethics?” Public Understanding of Science 14 (4): 409–421. doi: 10.1177/0963662505056616
86. Mikulak, A. 2011. “Mismatches Between ‘Scientific’ and ‘Non-Scientific’ Ways of Knowing and Their Contributions to Public Understanding of Science.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45 (2): 201–215. doi: 10.1007/s12124-011-9157-8
87. Miller, N. R., 2011. “Checking for Plagiarism, Duplicate Publication, and Text Recycling.” Lancet 377 (9775): 1403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60565-5
88. Miller, P., and N., Rose. 1990. “Governing Economic Life.” Economy and Society 19 (1): 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
89. Nature Editors. 2009. A Responsibility Index. Vol. 457. Nature Publishing Group.
90. Nicholas, B. 1999. “Molecular Geneticists and Moral Responsibility: ‘Maybe If We Were Working on the Atom Bomb I Would Have a Different Argument’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4): 515–530. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0052-3
91. Nowotny, H. 2005. “High- and Low-Cost Realities for Science and Society.” Science 308 (5725): 1117–1118. doi: 10.1126/science.1113825
92. Nüsslin, Fridtjof, and William, Hendee. 2008. “A Statement of the Rights of Scientists and Engineers.” Physica Medica 24 (3): 127–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.08.001
93. Owen, R., D., Baxter, T., Maynard, and M., Depledge. 2009. “Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (18): 6902–6906. doi: 10.1021/es803332u
94. Peiffer, A. M., C. E., Hugenschmidt, and P. J., Laurienti. 2011. “Ethics in 15 Min Per Week.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2): 289–297. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9197-3
95. Perlis, C., and N., Shannon. 2012. “Role of Professional Organizations in Setting and Enforcing Ethical Norms.” Clinics in Dermatology 30 (2): 156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.002
96. Phelps, R., and E., Fisher. 2011. “Legislating the Laboratory’ Promotion and Precaution in a Nanomaterials Company.” Biomedical Nanotechnology 726 (2011): 339–358.
97. Pimple, K. D., 2002. “Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2): 191–205. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1
98. Pittenger, D. J., 2003. “Intellectual Freedom and Editorial Responsibilities Within the Context of Controversial Research.” Ethics Behavior 13 (2): 105–125. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1302_01
99. PLoS Medicine Editors. 2010. “Increased Responsibility and Transparency in an Era of Increased Visibility.” PLoS Medicine 7 (10): 1–2.
100. Poff, D. 2009. “Reflections on Ethics in Journal Publications.” Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1): 51–55. doi: 10.1007/s10805-009-9090-3
101. Rappert, B. 2003. “Coding Ethical Behaviour. The Challenges of Biological Weapons.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4): 453–470. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0044-7
102. Redman, B. K., and A. L., Caplan. 2005. “Off with Their Heads: The Need to Criminalize Some Forms of Scientific Misconduct.” The Journal of Law, Medicine 33 (2): 345–348.
103. Rhodes, R. 2012. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. 25th Anniversary ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
104. Riis, P. 2001. “Scientific Dishonesty: European Reflections.” Journal of Clinical Pathology 54 (1): 4–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.1.4
105. Rip, A. 2009. “Futures of ELSA: Science Society Series on Convergence Research.” EMBO Reports 10 (7): 666–670. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.149
106. Ritterbush, Philip C., 1977. “The Public Side of Science.” Change 9 (9): 26–33. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1977.10569232
107. Roco, M. C., 2006. Progress in Governance of Converging Technologies Integrated from the Nanoscale. Vol. 1093. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
108. Roco, M. C., B., Harthorn, D., Guston, and P., Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9): 3557–3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
109. Roland, M.-C., 2007. “Who Is Responsible?” EMBO Reports 8 (8): 706–711. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401035
110. Rose, N., and P., Miller. 1992. “Political Power Beyond the State. Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205. doi: 10.2307/591464
111. Rotblat, J. 1999. “A Hippocratic Oath for Scientists.” Science 286 (5444): 1475. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5444.1475
112. Rothman, K. J., and C., Poole. 1985. “Science and Policy Making.” American Journal of Public Health 75 (4): 340–341. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.75.4.340
113. Sandler, Ronald. 2007. “Nanotechnology and Social Context.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 27 (6): 446–454. doi: 10.1177/0270467607308288
114. Sassower, R. 1996. “Responsible Technoscience: The Haunting Reality of Auschwitz and Hiroshima.” Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3): 277–290. doi: 10.1007/BF02583914
115. Schmaus, W. 1983. “Fraud and the Norms of Science.” Science, Technology, Human Values 8 (4): 12–22.
116. Schrag, B., L., Love-Gregory, K. M. T., Muskavitch, and J., McCafferty. 2003. “Forbidden Knowledge: A Case Study with Commentaries Exploring Ethical Issues and Genetic Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3): 409–416. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0037-6
117. Schuurbiers, D., P., Osseweijer, and J., Kinderlerer. 2009. “Implementing the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice–A Case Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2): 213–231. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9114-9
118. Schuurbiers, D., S., Sleenhoff, J. F., Jacobs, and P., Osseweijer. 2009. “Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education–The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model.” NanoEthics 3 (3): 197–211. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0073-z
119. Scott, P. 2003. “The Ethical Implications of the New Research Paradigm.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1): 73–84. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0021-1
120. Seiler, S. N., B. J., Brummel, K. L., Anderson, K. J., Kim, S., Wee, C. K., Gunsalus, and M. C., Loui. 2011. “Outcomes Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research.” Accountability in Research 18 (4): 217–246.
121. Shamir, R. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization. On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03085140701760833
122. Shapin, S. 2008. The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
123. Slesser, A. A. P., and Y. A., Qureshi. 2009. “The Implications of Fraud in Medical and Scientific Research.” World Journal of Surgery 33 (11): 2355–2359. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0201-5
124. Smith, M. L., 1992. “On being an Authentic Scientist.” Ethics and Human Research 14 (2): 1–4. doi: 10.2307/3564534
125. Smith, R. 1998. “Beyond Conflict of Interest.” British Medical Journal 317 (7154): 291–292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7154.291
126. Steckler, Bernard M., 1973. “The World of Science and the World of People.” Journal of Chemical Education 50 (1): 46–49. doi: 10.1021/ed050p46
127. Stieb, J. A., 2008. “A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2): 219–233. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9067-4
128. Stilgoe, J., R., Owen, and P., Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
129. Strydom, Piet. 1999. “The Challenge of Responsibility for Sociology.” Current Sociology 47 (3): 65–82. doi: 10.1177/0011392199047003006
130. Studer, Kenneth E., and Daryl E., Chubin. 1977. “Ethics and the Unintended Consequences of Social Research: A Perspective from the Sociology of Science.” Policy Sciences 8 (2): 111–124. doi: 10.1007/BF01712288
131. Sutcliffe, H. 2011. “A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation.” Accessed January 17, 2013. http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRI-Report2.pdf
132. Sweeney, A. E., 2006. “Social and Ethical Dimensions of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3): 435–464. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0044-5
133. Taylor, P., 2009. “Scientific Self-Regulation—So Good, How Can It Fail? Commentary on ‘The Problems with Forbidding Science’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3): 395–406. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9123-8
134. Thorpe, Charles. 2004. “Violence and the Scientific Vocation.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (3): 59–84. doi: 10.1177/0263276404043620
135. Underwood, M. C., 2009. “Joseph Rotblat and the Moral Responsibilities of the Scientist.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2): 129–134. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9117-6
136. Van der Burg, S., and A., van Gorp. 2005. “Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.” Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2): 235–256. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x
137. Vessuri, H. 2002. “Ethical Challenges for the Social Sciences on the Threshold of the 21st Century.” Current Sociology 50 (1): 135–150. doi: 10.1177/0011392102050001010
138. Vogt, Tom, Davis, Baird, and Chris, Robinson. 2007. “Opportunities in the ‘Post-Academic’ World.” Nature Nanotechnology 2 (6): 329–332. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.164
139. Vollmer, W. M., 2007. “Responsibilities of Authorship.” Chest 132 (6): 2042–2045. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2051
140. Von Hippel, Frank. 1978. “Professional Freedom and Responsibility: The Role of the Professional Society.” Science, Technology & Human Values 3 (1): 37–42. doi: 10.1177/016224397800300107
141. Von Schomberg, R., 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. European Commission Services, Directorate General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
142. Waelbers, K. 2009. “Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1): 51–68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x
143. Wager, E. 2011. “Coping with Scientific Misconduct.” British Medical Journal 343 (7831): 992–993.
144. Watson, Bernard C., 1974. “The Social Responsibility of the Social Scientist.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, Chicago, April 15–19.
145. Weed, D. L., and R. E., Mckeown. 2003. “Science and Social Responsibility in Public Health.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (14): 1804–1808. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6198
146. Werner-Felmayer, G. 2010. “Rethinking the Meaning of Being a Scientist–The Role of Scientific Integrity Boards and Some Thoughts about Scientific Culture.” Medicine and Law 29 (3): 329–339.
147. Whitbeck, C. 1995. “Truth and Trustworthiness in Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4): 403–416. doi: 10.1007/BF02583258
148. Wing, S. 2003. “Objectivity and Ethics in Environmental Health Science.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (14): 1809–1818. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6200
149. Wolpe, P. R., 2006. “Reasons Scientists Avoid Thinking about Ethics.” Cell 125 (6): 1023–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.001
150. Wolpert, L. 1989. “The Social Responsibility of Scientists: Moonshine and Morals.” British Medical Journal 298 (6678): 941–943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6678.941
151. Wolpert, L. 2005. “The Medawar Lecture 1998 Is Science Dangerous?” Philosophical Transactions–Royal Society Biological Sciences 360 (1458): 1253–1258. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1659
152. Woollard, Robert F., 2006. “Caring for a Common Future: Medical Schools’ Social Accountability.” Medical Education 40 (4): 301–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02416.x
153. Ziman, J. 1998. “Why Must Scientists Become More Ethically Sensitive than They Used to Be?” Science 282 (5395): 1813–1814. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1813
154. Ziman, J. 2001. “Getting Scientists to Think about What They Are Doing.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2): 165–176. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0038-2