Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research

Accountability in Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 217-246

  Seiler, Stephanie N ^a   Brummel, Bradley J ^b   Anderson, Kerri L ^c   Kim, Kyoung Jin ^d   Wee, Serena ^e   Gunsalus, C K ^a   Loui, Michael C ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^c PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^d ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^f University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Responsible conduct of research; Role play

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; RESEARCH ETHICS; ROLE PLAYING; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADULT; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW; ROLE PLAYING; STUDENTS; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960153464     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.584760     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bebeau, M. J., Pimple, K. D., Muskavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., Smith, D. H., and Agnew, E. (1995). Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment. Bloomington, IN.: Indiana University. Available at http://poynter.indiana.edu/mr/mr.pdf. Last accessed 25 May 2011.
2. Borman, W. C. (1986). Behavior based rating. In Berk, R. A. (ed.) Performance Assessment: Methods and Applications. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Braunschweiger, P., and Goodman, K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9): 861-864.
4. Brummel, B. J., Gunsalus, C. K., Anderson, K. L., and Loui, M. C. (2010). Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(3): 573-589.
5. Bulger, R. E., and Heitman, E. (2008). Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university. Academic Medicine, 82(9): 876-878.
6. Gunsalus, C. K. (1998). How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4: 51-64.
7. Heitman, E., Olsen, C. H., Anestidou, L., and Bulger, R. E. (2007). New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9): 838-845.
8. Hertel, J. P., and Millis, B. J. (2002). Using Simulations to Promote Learning in Higher Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
9. Hollander, R., and Arenberg, C. R. (Eds.). (2009). Ethics Education and Scientific and Engineering Research: What's Been Learned? What Should Be Done? Report of a Workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
10. Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult Learning in the Social Context. London: Croom Helm.
11. Kalichman, M. W., and Plemmons, D. K. (2007). Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine, 82(9): 846-852.
12. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., and Mumford, M. D. (2008). A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1): 3-31.
13. Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology Press.
14. McGee, R., Almquist, J., Keller, J. L., and Jacobsen, S. J. (2008). Teaching and learning responsible conduct of research: Influences of prior experiences on acceptance of new ideas. Accountability in Research, 15(1): 30-62.
15. National Institutes of Health. (NIH). (1992). Reminder and update: requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training grants. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 21(43).
16. National Science Foundation's (NSF) Implementation of Section 7009 of the America COMPETES Act. (2009). Federal Register, 74(160). Available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-19930.htm. Last accessed 16 May 2010.
17. Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Pimple, K. D. (2007). Using case studies in teaching research ethics. Resources. Paper 293. Available at http://www.ethicslibrary.org/resources/293. Last accessed 13 February 2010.
19. Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Sindelar, M., Shuman, L., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Miller, R., Mitcham, C., Olds, B., Pinkus, R., & Wolfe, H. (2003). Assessing engineering students' abilities to resolve ethical dilemmas. Proceedings, 33rd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Westminster, Colo., November 5-8, 2003 (pp. S2A-25 to S2A-31).
21. Steneck, N.H., & Bulger, R.E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829-834.
22. Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299-308.
23. Whitbeck, C. (1996). Ethics as design: Doing justice to moral problems. The Hastings Center Report, 26(3), 9-16.