Who is responsible? Supervisors and institutions need to focus on training in the responsible conduct of research and change the culture in the laboratory

EMBO Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 706-711

  Roland, Marie Claude ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; COMPETENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LABORATORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONALISM; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SKILL; SOCIETY; STUDENT; TEACHER; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; RESEARCH; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TEACHING;

EID: 34547639903     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401035     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Buono C (2007) Thésard, vie de loser. 20th March. Libération
2. CEEBL (2006) Strategic Plan. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. www.campus.manchester.ac.uk/ceebl
3. Council for Science and Technology (2005) Rigour, Respect and Responsibility: A Universal Ethical Code for Scientists. London, U K: Department of Trade and Industry. www.dti.gov.uk
4. Cryer P (2006) The Research Student's Guide to Success. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
5. Elliott D, Stern JE (1997) Research Ethics.A Reader. Lebanon, NH, USA: University Press of New England
6. Fiske P. Louie A (2000) Put your Science to Work: The Take-Charge Career Guide for Scientists. Washington, DC, USA: American Geophysical Union
7. Golde CM, Dore TM (2001) At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal About Doctoral Education. Philadelphia, PA, USA: The Pew Charitable Trusts
8. Hallack J & Poisson M (2007) Corrupt Schools, Corrupt Universities: What can be Done? Paris, France: International Institute for Educational Planning
9. Hung DWL (1999) Activity, apprenticeship, and epistemological appropriation: Implications from the writings of Michael Polanyi. Educ Psychol 34: 193-205
10. Kalichman M (2002) Mentoring. La Jolla, CA, USA: Responsible Conduct of Research Education Center. http://rcrec.org
11. Kenny SS et al (1998) Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY, USA. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University
12. Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press
13. Larsen PO (2004) Quality in Research Training, Nordic Cooperation on Quality Assessment of Research Training. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Academy for Advanced Study (NorFA)
14. Mace G, Pétry F (2000) Guide d'Élaboration d'un Projet de Recherche 2nd edn. Laval, France: Presses de l'Université de Laval
15. Peters RL (1992) Getting What You Came For: The Smart Student's Guide to Earning an M.A. or a Ph.D. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
16. Resnik DB (1998) The Ethics of Science; An Introduction (Philosophical Issues in Science). London, UK: Routledge
17. Roland MC (2007) Publish and perish: Hedging and fraud in scientific discourse. EMBO Rep 8: 424-428
18. Shamoo AE, Resnik DB (2003) Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
19. Song L, Hannaun M, Hill J (2007) Reconciling beliefs and practices in teaching and learning. Educ Tech Res Dev 55: 27-50