'How do we know it's not been done yet?!' trust, trust building and regulation in stem cell research

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 703-718

  Bates, Stephen R ^a   Faulkner, Wendy ^b   Parry, Sarah ^b   Cunningham Burley, Sarah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 78649271674     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/spp/37.9.703     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, Rob, Lewis A Baxter and Kenneth N Cissna eds 2004. Dialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Beck, Ulrich 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
3. Bognor, Alexander and Wolfgang Menz 2006. Science crime: the Korean cloning scandal and the role of ethics. Science and Public Policy, 33(8), October, 601-612.
4. Brown, Nik 2003. Hope against hype: accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16(2), 3-21.
5. Brown, Nik and Mike Michael 2002. From authority to authenticity: the changing governance of biotechnology. Health, Risk and Society, 4(3), 259-272.
6. Brownlie, Julie 2008. Conceptualizing trust and health. In Researching Trust and Health, eds J Brownlie, A Greene and A Howson, pp. 17-32. London: Routledge.
7. Brownlie, Julie, Alexandra Greene and Alexandra Howson eds 2008. Researching Trust and Health. London: Routledge.
8. Calnan, Michael, Rosemary Rowe and Vikki Entwhistle 2006. Trust relations in health care: an agenda for future research. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 20(5), 477-484.
9. Chalmers, Don and Dianne Nicol 2004. Commercialisation of biotechnology: public trust and research. International Journal of Biotechnology, 6(2/3), 116-133.
10. Collins, H M and Rob Evans 2002. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235-296.
11. Critchley, Christine R 2008. Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 309-327.
12. Critchley, Christine and Lyn Turney 2004. Understanding Australians' perceptions of controversial scientific research. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2(2), 82-107.
13. Cunningham-Burley, Sarah 2006. Public knowledge and public trust. Community Genetics, 9(3), 204-210.
14. Einsiedel, Edna, Shainur Premji, Rose Geransar, Noelle C Orton, Thushaanthini Thavaratnam and Laura K Bennett 2009. Diversity in public views toward stem cell sources and policies. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 5(2), 102-107.
15. Giddens, Anthony 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Gieryn, Thomas 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
17. Gilbert, Nigel G and Michael Mulkay 1984. Opening Pandora's Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. London: Cambridge University Press.
18. Goffman, Erving 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
19. Gottweis, Herbert and Robert Triendl 2006. South Korean policy failure and the Hwang debacle. Nature Biotechnology, 24(2) 141-143.
20. Haddow, Gill and Sarah Cunningham-Burley 2008. Tokens of trust or token trust? Public consultation and 'Generation Scotland'. In Researching Trust and Health, eds J Brownlie, A Greene and A Howson, pp. 152-174. London: Routledge.
21. Hardin, Russell 2001. Conceptions and explanatios of trust. In Trust in Society, ed. R Hardin, pp. 3-39: London: Sage.
22. Hardin, Russell 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Hardin, Russell 2006. Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology 2000. Science and Society: Report from the Select Committee. London: The Stationary Office.
25. Irwin, Alan and Brian Wynne eds 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kennedy, Donald 2006. Science Editorial Statement, 10 January. Available at , last accessed 4 November 2009.
27. Lee, Chul-Joo, Diettram A Scheufle and Bruce V Lewenstein 2005. Public attitudes towards emerging technologies: examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes towards nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2) 240-267.
28. Lenard, Patti Tamara 2008. Trust your compatriots, but count your change: the roles of trust, mistrust and distrust in democracy. Political Studies, 56(2) 312-332.
29. Liu, Hui and Susanna Priest 2009. Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704-718.
30. Luhman, N 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.
31. MacKenzie, Donald 1998. The certainty trough. In Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives, eds R Williams, W Faulkner and J Fleck, pp. 325-329. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
32. Marks, Nicola 2008. Opening Up Spaces for Reflexivity? Scientists' Discourses about Stem Cell Research and Public Engagement. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
33. Martinson, Brian C, Melissa S Anderson and Raymond de Vries 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738.
34. Mathews, D and N McAfee 2003. Making Choices Together: the Power of Public Deliberation. Dayton, Ohio: The Kettering Foundation.
35. Michael, Mike 1992. Lay discourses of science: science-ingeneral, science-in particular, and self. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 17(3), 313-333.
36. Möllering, Guido 2006. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.
37. Muller-Jung, Joachim 2006. Ein unsicherer Kantonist. Franfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1.
38. Nisbet, Matthew C 2004. Public opinion about stem cell research and human cloning. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 131-154.
39. Parry, Sarah 2006. (Re)Constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Social Science and Medicine, 62(10), 2349-2359.
40. Parry, Sarah 2009. Stem cell scientists' discursive strategies for cognitive authority. Science as Culture, 18(1), 89-114.
41. Parry, Sarah 2010. Interspecies entities and the politics of nature. In Nature After the Genome, eds Sarah Parry and John Dupré, pp. 113-128. Oxford: Blackwell/Sociological Review.
42. Parry, Sarah, Sarah Cunningham-Burley and Wendy Faulkner 2009. The Social Dynamics of Public Engagement in Stem Cell Research - Final Research Report. Mimeo.
43. Pearce, Kimberly A 2002. Making Better Social Worlds: Engaging in and Facilitating Dialogic Communication. Redwood City, CA: Pearce Associates.
44. Rowe, Rosemary and Michael Calnan 2006. Trust relations in health care: developing a theoretical framework for the 'new' NHS. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 20(5), 376-396.
45. Smith, C 2005. Understanding trust and confidence: two paradigms and their significance for health and social care. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(3), 299-316.
46. Solomon R C 2000. Trusting. In Heidegger, Coping and Cognitive Science, eds M Wrathall and J Malpas, pp. 229-244. Cambridge: MIT Press.
47. Sverszynsi, Bronislaw 1999. Risk and trust: the performative dimension. Environmental Values, 8(2), 239-252.
48. Sztompka, Piotr 1999. Trust: a Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Ullmann-Margalit, Edna 2004. Trust, distrust, and in between. In Distrust, ed. R Hardin, pp. 60-82. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
50. Van der Schee, Evelien, Peter P Groenewegen and Roland D Friele 2006. Public trust in health care: a performance indicator? Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 20(5), 468-476.
51. Weingart, Peter 2001. Die Stunde die Wahrheit? Zum Verhaltnis der Wissenschaft zu Politik, Wirtschaft und Medien in der Wissengesellschaft. Weilerswist: Velbruck Wissenshaft.
52. Weingart, Peter 2006. Hwang und Rang: die betrugende, betrogene Wissenschaft. Suddeutsche Zeitung, 2 January, 13.
53. Wynne, Brian 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 19, 1-17.
54. Wynne, Brian 1995. Public understanding of science. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, eds S Jasanoff, G Markle, J Peterson and T Pinch, pp. 361-368. London: Sage.
55. Wynne, Brian 1996a. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science. In Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, eds Alan Irwin and Brian Wynne, pp. 19-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Wynne, B 1996b. May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, eds S Lash, B Szerszynski and B Wynne, pp. 44-83. London: Sage
57. Wynne, Brian 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9(3), 211-220.