Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3557-3590

  Roco, Mihail C ^a   Harthorn, Barbara ^b   Guston, David ^c   Shapira, Philip ^d  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethical and legal aspects; International perspective; Nanoscale science and engineering; Nanotechnology innovation and commercialization; Nanotechnology market; Public participation; Responsible development, Global governance, Emerging technologies; Societal implications

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL GOVERNANCE; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; LEGAL ASPECTS; NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS;

ECONOMICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

INNOVATION;

COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW;

EID: 81055157986     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch ME, Wajcman J (eds) The new handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 979-1000
2. Barker T, Lesnick ML, Mealey T, Raimond R, Walker S, Rejeski D, Timberlake L (2005) Nanotechnology and the poor: opportunities and risks - closing the gaps within and between sectors of society. Meridian Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1047276/NANOTECHNOLOGY-and-the-POOR
3. BCC Research 2010 Nanotechnology in medical applications: The global market. Wellesley, Mass.: BCC. Report Code: HLC069A
4. Beaudrie C (2010) Emerging nanotechnologies and life cycle regulation: An investigation of federal regulatory oversight from nanomaterial production to end-of-life. Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia. http://www.chem heritage.org/Downloads/Publications/White-Papers/Studiesin-Sustainability- Beaudrie.pdf
5. Bennett I, Sarewitz D (2006) Too little, too late? Research policies on the societal implications of nanotechnology in the United States. Sci Cult (Lond) 15(4):309-325
6. Berube DM, Cummings CL, Frith JH, Binder AR, Oldendick R (2010) Comparing nanoparticles risk perceptions to other EHS risks. J Nanopart Res. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-03 25-z
7. Bosso C (ed) (2010) Governing uncertainty: environmental regulation in the age of nanotechnology. EarthScan, London
8. Breggin L, Falkner R, Jaspers N, Pendergrass J, Porter R (2009) Securing the promise of nanotechnologies: towards transatlantic regulatory cooperation. Chatham House, London. http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/nanotechnology
9. Business Insights (2010) Nanotechnology in healthcare. Market outlook for applications, tools and materials, and 40 company profiles. Business Insights Ltd., London. http:// www.globalbusinessinsights.com/content/rbdd0035p.htm
10. Carlton D, Perloff J (2000) Modern industrial organization. Pearson, London
11. Carrier M (2008) Two puzzles resolved: of the Schumpeter-Arrow stalemate and pharmaceutical innovation markets. Iowa Law Rev 93(2):393
12. Center for Nanotechnology in Society at University of California at Santa Barbara (CNS-UCSB) (2009) Emerging economies/Emerging technologies: [Nano]technologies for equitable development. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop, Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, Washington, DC, 4-6 November 2009
13. Chen H, Roco M (2009) Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge. Global and longitudinal patent and literature analysis series. Springer, Berlin
14. Conti JA, Killpack K, Gerritzen G, Huang L, Mircheva M, Delmas M, Harthorn BH, Appelbaum RP, Holden PA (2008) Health and safety practices in the nanotechnology workplace: results from an international survey. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):3155-3162
15. Cooper RG (2001) Winning at new products. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA
16. Corley EA, Scheufele DA (2010) Outreach going wrong? When we talk nano to the public, we are leaving behind key audiences. Scientist 24(1):22
17. Cozzens S, Wetmore J (eds) (2010) Yearbook of nanotechnology in society, Vol. II: nanotechnology and the challenge of equity and equality. Springer, New York
18. Davies JC (2009) Oversight of next generation nanotechnology. Presentation, Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, April 2009
19. Delemarle A, Kahane B, Villard L, Laredo P (2009) Geography of knowledge production in nanotechnologies: a flat world with many hills and mountains. Nanotechnol Law Bus 6:103-122
20. Directions-to-2020/Salamanca-Buentello F, Persad DL, Court EB, Martin DK, Daar AS, Singer PA (2005) Nanotechnology and the developing world. Policy Forum 2(5): 383-386
21. Fernandez-Ribas A (2009) Global patent strategies of SMEs in nanotechnology. Working paper. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
22. Fiorino DJ (2010) Voluntary initiatives, regulation, and nanotechnology oversight: charting a path. Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars (PEN 19). Presented 4 November 2010. http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/ 8346/fiorino-presentation.pdf
23. Fisher E, Mahajan LRL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26(6):486-496
24. Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore J (eds) (2008) Yearbook of nanotechnology in society, Vol. I: presenting futures. Springer, New York
25. Foundation for the Future (FFF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2007) Humanity and the Biosphere. The next thousand years. In: Seminar Proceedings, 20-22 Sept 2006, Paris, France, FFF, Bellevue, WA. http://www.futurefoundation. org/documents/hum-pro- sem7.pdf
26. Gomez-Baquero F (2009) Measuring the generality of nanotechnologies and its potential economic implications. Paper presented at Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, 2009. IEEE Xplore, 2-3 Oct 2009, pp 1-9. doi:10.1109/ACSIP.2009.5367858
27. Graham SJH, Iacopetta M (2009) Nanotechnology and the emergence of a general purpose technology. Georgia Inst Techn. Working Paper Series
28. Guston D (2008) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940-941. doi:10.1038/454940a
29. Guston D (ed) (2010a) Encyclopedia of nano-science and society. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Guston D (2010) Public engagement with nanotechnology. 2020 Science. http://2020science.org/2010/03/30/publicengagement-with-nanotechnology
31. Hamlett P, Cobb MD, Guston DH (2008) National Citizens' Technology Forum: Nanotechnologies and human enhancement. CNS Report #R08-0003. Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Tempe, AZ. http://www.cspo. org/library/type/?action= getfile&file=88§ion=lib
32. Harthorn B (2010) Public participation in nanotechnology - should we care? 2020 Science. http://2020science.org/2010/ 05/04/public-participation-in- nanotechnology-should-we-care
33. Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rogers J (2009) Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. In: Monograph of the 2009 Nanoethics Graduate Education Symposium, University of Washington, Seattle. http://depts. washington.edu/ntethics/symposium/NanoethicsSpecial EditionMonograph.pdf
34. Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Ludlow K (2007) Introduction: big questions for small technologies. In: Hodge GA, Bowman D, Ludlow K (eds) New global frontiers in regulation: the age of nanotechnology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3-26
35. Hodge GA, Bowman DM, Maynard AD (eds) 2010 International handbook on regulating Nanotechnologies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. E-book: 978 1 84844 673 1
36. Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Roco MC (2005) Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1990-2002): the National Science Foundation funding and its impact on patents. J Nanopart Res 7(4-5):343-376
37. Hwang D (2010) Ranking the nations on nanotech: hidden havens and false threats. Lux Research, New York
38. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2009) Appropriate risk governance strategies for nanotechnology applications in food and cosmetics. IRGC, Geneva. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC-PBnanofood-WEB.pdf
39. Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: science advisors as policymakers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Kuzma J, Paradise J, Ramachandran G, Kim J, Kokotovich A, Wolf S (2008) An integrated approach to oversight assessment for emerging technologies. RiskAnal 28(5):1197-1219
41. Li X, Lin Y, Chen H, Roco M (2007) Worldwide nanotechnology development: a comparative study ofUSPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976-2004). J Nanopart Res 9(6):977-1002
42. Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus RC (2007) Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 9(4):543-554
43. Lux Research (2004) The nanotech report: investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. Lux Research, New York
44. Lux Research (2009) The recession's ripple effect on nanotech. State of the market report. Lux Research, New York
45. Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) "Mind the gap": Science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 14(3):R9. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201
46. Nadagouda MN, Castle AB, Murdock RC, Hussain SM, Varma RS (2010) In vitro biocompatibility of nanoscale zerovalent iron particles (NZVI) synthesized using teapolyphenols. Green Chem 12(1):114-122
47. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2004) Report: International dialogue on responsible research and development of nanotechnology. Meridian Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/activities/dialog.jsp
48. Nikulainen T, Kulvik M (2009) How general are general purpose technologies? Evidence from nano-, bio- and ICT-technologies in Finland. Discussion Paper 1208. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, Finland
49. Pew Research Center for the Public and the Press (2010) Ideological news sources: who watches and why. Pew, Washington, DC. http://people-press.org/ reports/pdf/652.pdf
50. Pidgeon N, Harthorn B, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009a) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95-98. doi:10.1038/nnano. 2008.362
51. Pidgeon N, Harthorn B, Satterfield T (2009b) Nanotech: good or bad? Chem Eng Today 822-823:37-39
52. Powell N (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists' standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. Health Risk Soc 9(2):173-190
53. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2005) Report to the President and Congress on the third assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC. http://www.nano.gov/html/res/otherpubs.html
54. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2010) Report to the President and Congress on the third assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC. http://www.nano.gov/html/res/otherpubs.html
55. Renn O, Roco MC (2006) White paper on nanotechnology risk governance. International RiskGovernance Council (IRGC), Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.irgc.org/Publications
56. Richman E, Hutchison J (2009) The nanomaterial characterization bottleneck. ACS Nano 3(9):2441-2446. doi:10.1021/ nn901112p
57. Roco MC (2001) International strategy for nanotechnology research. J Nanopart Res 3(5-6):353-360
58. Roco MC (2004) Nanoscale science and engineering: unifying and transforming tools. AIChE J 50(5):890-897
59. Roco MC (2008)Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J Nanopart Res 10:11-29. doi:10.1007/ s11051-007-9269-8
60. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. http://www.wtec.org/ loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf
61. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Springer, Dordrecht. http://www.wtec.org/ ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC-report.pdf
62. Roco MC, Renn O (2008) Nanotechnology risk governance. In: Renn O, Walker K (eds) Global risk governance: applying and testing the IRGC framework. Springer, Berlin, pp 301-325
63. Roco MC, Williams RS, Alivisatos P (eds) (1999) Nanotechnology research directions: vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade. NSTC, Washington, DC (also Springer, 2000). http://www.nano.gov/html/res/pubs.html
64. Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (eds) (2010) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. NSF/WTEC report, Springer. http://www.wtec.org/nano2/Nanotechnology-Research
65. Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Beaudrie C, Conti J, Harthorn BH (2009) Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. Nat Nanotechnol 4:752-758. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009. 265
66. Scheufele DA, Corley EA (2008) The science and ethics of good communication. Next Gen Pharm 4(1):66
67. Sclove R (2010) Reinventing technology assessment: a 21st century model. Science and Technology Innovation Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/topics/docs/ ReinventingTechnologyAssessment1.pdf
68. Selin C (2008) The sociology of the future: tracing stories of technology and time. Sociol Compass 2(6):1878-1895
69. Service R (2010) Nanoparticle Trojan horses gallop from the lab into the clinic. Nature 330:314-315
70. Shapira P, Youtie J, Kay L (2010) National innovation system dynamics in the globalization of nano-technology innovation (working paper). Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Atlanta, GA
71. Singer PA, Salamanca-Buentello F, Daar AS (2005) Harnessing nanotechnology to improve global equity. Issues Sci Technol 21(4):57-64. http://www.issues.org/21.4/singer.html
72. Sparrow R (2007) Negotiating the nanodivides. In: Hodge GA, Bowman D, Ludlow K (eds) New global frontiers in regulation: the age of nanotechnology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 97-109
73. Stokes DE (1997) The Pasteur quadrant. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
74. Subramanian V, Youtie J, Porter AL, Shapira P (2010) Is there a shift to "active nanostructures"? J Nanopart Res 12(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9729-4
75. Tervonnen T, Linkov I, Figueira JR, Steevens J, Chappell M, Merad M (2009) Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 11:757-766
76. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2006) The ethics and politics of nanotechnology. UNESCO, Paris
77. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2005) Chemical regulation: Options exist to improve EPA's ability to assess health risks and manage its chemical review program. GAO, Washington, DC. Report GAO-05-458. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05458.pdf
78. Wang J, Shapira P (2009) Partnering with universities: a good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? Small Bus Econ. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9248-9
79. Wetmore J, Fisher E, Selin C (eds) (2008) Presenting futures: yearbook of nanotechnology in society. Springer, New York
80. Wolf SM, Ramachandran G, Kuzma J, Paradise J (2009) Symposium: developing oversight approaches to nanobiotechnology - the lessons of history. J Law Med Ethics 37(4):732
81. Youtie J, Iacopetta M, Graham S (2008) Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? J Technol Transf 33(3):315-329