Science policy in changing times: Are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition?

Research Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1519-1531

  Beesley, Lisa G A ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Co operative research; Knowledge management; Science policy; Triple helix; University industry government relations

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CO-OPERATIVE RESEARCH;

RESEARCH;

EID: 0042631433     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00023-4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Argote, L., 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
2. Batterham, R., 2000. Investing in knowledge generation for the twenty first century. A Chief Scientist Project. Canberra.
3. Benner M., Sandstrom U. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy. 29:2000;291-301.
4. Boesman, W.C., 1997. Analysis of Ten Selected Science and Technology Policy Studies, 97-836 SPR. Science Policy Research Division, Washington, DC.
5. Brandenburger, A., Nalebuff, B., 1996. Co-opetition, Doubleday, New York, NY.
6. Buchanan Communications Group, 1999. Review of the Science and Technology Awareness Program. Department of Industry Science and Resources, Canberra.
7. Bush, V., 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
8. Chalip L. Policy research as social science: outflanking the value dilemma. Policy Studies Review. 52:1985;287-308.
9. Council on Governmental Relations, 1999. The Bayh-Dole Act: A Guide to the Law and Implementing Regulations. Council on Governmental Relations, Washington, DC.
10. Dasgupta P., David P.A. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy. 23:1994;487-521.
11. David, P.A., Foray, D., 2002a. Economic fundamentals of the knowledge society. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 01-14. Stanford Institute for Economic Research Policy, Stanford, CA.
12. David P.A., Foray D. An introduction to the economy of a knowledge society. International Social Science Journal. 54:2002b;9-23.
13. David P.A., Steinmueller W.E. Standards, trade and competition in emerging global information infrastructure environment. Telecommunications Policy. 20:1996;817-830.
14. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 1999. Knowledge and Innovation: a Policy Statement on Research and Research Training. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.
15. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 2000. Higher Education: Report for the 2000 to 2002 Triennium. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.
16. Department of Industry, Science and Resources (DISR) 1999. Science and Technology Budget Statement 1999-00. Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Canberra.
17. Department of Industry, Science and Technology (DIST), 1995. Changing Research Culture. AGPS, Canberra.
18. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), 1998. Or Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy. UK Government Press, London.
19. Erwee, R., 2000. Business Networks: Spanning Boundaries and Incorporating Teams. In: Wiesner, R., Millett, B. (Eds.), Management and Organizational Behaviour. Wiley, Brisbane.
20. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and Mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 29:2000;109-123.
21. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotney, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage, London.
22. Gibson, R., 1997. Rethinking the Future. Nicholas Brealy, London.
23. Hall P. Experiment and evolution in science and technology policy: recent Australian experience. Prometheus. 152:1997;173-179.
24. Healy S.A. Changing science and ensuring our future. Futures. 296:1997;505-517.
25. House Committee on Science, 1998. Unlocking our Future: Towards a New National Science Policy. House Committee on Science, Washington, DC.
26. Industry Canada, 1997. Minding our Future: A Report on Federal Science and Technology. Industry Canada, Ontario.
27. Johnston R., Blumentritt R. Knowledge moves to centre stage. Science Communication. 201:1998;98-105.
28. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1980. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergan, Philadelphia.
29. Knorr-Cetina, K., 1995. Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In: Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J., Pinch, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, California.
30. Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
31. Langfield-Smith K. Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. Journal of Management Studies. 293:1992;266-285.
32. Leach, E., 1970. Levi-Strauss. Fontana, London.
33. Lenski, G., Lenski, J., 1987. Human Societies, fifth ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
34. Leydesdorff L. The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy. 29:2000;243-255.
35. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 23:1996;279-286.
36. Nelson S.D. Knowledge creation: an overview. Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Utilization. 11:1979;123-149.
37. OECD, 1994a. Accessing and Expanding the Science and Technology Base. OECD, Paris.
38. OECD, 1994b. Interactions for Knowledge Systems: Foundation, Policy Implications and Empirical Methods. OECD, Paris.
39. Patton, M., 1977. In search of impact: an analysis of the utilization of Federal health education research. In: Weiss, C. (Ed.), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
40. Prime Minister's Science, Engineering, and Innovation Council (PMSEIC), 1998. University-Industry Linked Research in Australia. AGPS, Canberra.
41. Prime Minister's Science, Engineering, and Innovation Council (PMSEIC), 1999. Raising awareness of the importance of science and technology to Australia's future. In: Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the Fourth Meeting of the PMSEIC, 26 November 1999, AGPS, Canberra.
42. Romer P.A. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 985:1990;71-102.
43. Schaef, A.W., Fassel, D., 1988. The Addictive Organization. Harper and Row, San Francisco, CA.
44. Slatyer R.O. Major new program for co-operative research centres. Search. 215:1990;162-164.
45. Slatyer, R.O., 1993. Co-operative Research Centres: The Concept and its Implementation. In: Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the Research Grants, Management and Funding. AGPS, Canberra.
46. Snow, C.P., 1959. The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Sokal, A., Bricmont, J., 1998. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers' Abuse of Science. Profile Books, London.
48. Sparrow, J., 1998. Knowledge in Organizations: Access to Thinking at Work. Sage, London.
49. Sproull, L.S., 1981. Beliefs in organizations. In: Nystrom, P., Starbuck, W. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. Stanford University, 1998. Research Policy Handbook. Retrieved from the world wide web on 28 April 2002 ( http://www.stanford.edu/dept/DoR/rph/5.2.html ).
51. Stocker, J., 1997. Priority Matters: A Review of Science and Technology Arrangements. AGPS, Canberra.
52. Stokes, D.E., 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
53. Thompson, L., Levine, J., Messick, D. (Eds.), 1999. Shared Cognitions in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
54. Walker, D., 1997. Review of Science and Technology and the Innovation Gap in Canada. Standing Committee on Industry, Winnipeg.
55. Weiss C. Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Utilization. 13:1980;381-404.
56. Weiss, C.H. (Ed.), 1977. Using Social Science Research in Public Policy Making. DC Heath, Lexington, MA.
57. Ziman, J., 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Steady Dynamic State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.