A system approach to tertiary education institutions: Towards knowledge networks and enhanced societal trust

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 607-617

  Heitor, Manuel ^a  

^a Secretary of State for Science Technology and Higher Education   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; EDUCATION; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP;

EID: 58449133096     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234208X377371     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Barr, N 2004. Higher education funding. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(2), 264-283.
2. Barr, N 2008. Lessons learned from UK's Higher Education Funding schemes. Paper presented at International Conference on Increasing Accessibility to Higher Education - Some International Examples on Student Loans, University of Lisbon, 2 June 2008.
3. Barr, N 2008. Personal communication.
4. Barr, N and I Crawford 2005. Financing Higher Education: Answers from the UK. London: Routledge
5. Bennett, J 2003. Teaching and Learning Science: A Guide to Recent Research and its Applications. London: Continuum.
6. Clark, B R 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial University. Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
7. Conceição, P and M V Heitor 2005. Innovation for All? Learning from the Portuguese Path to Technical Change and the Dynamics of Innovation. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.
8. Conceição, P and M V Heitor 1999. On the role of the university in the knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 26(1), 37-51.
9. Conceição, P and M V Heitor 2007. Do we need a revisited policy agenda for research integrity?...an institutional perspective. Paper presented at World Conference on Research Integrity, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal, 16-18 September 2007.
10. Conceição, P, M V Heitor and F Veloso 2003. Infrastructures, incentives and institutions: fostering distributed knowledge bases for the learning society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(7), 583-617.
11. Conceição, P, M V Heitor, G Sirilli and R Wilson 2004. The swing of the pendulum from public to market support for science and technology: Is the US leading the way? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(5), 553-578.
12. Cooke, P and R Huggins 1996. University-Industry Relations in Wales. Working Paper, Center for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff.
13. David, P 2007. The Historical Origin of 'Open Science' - An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CA.
14. David, P and S Metcalfe 2007. Universities and Public Research Organizations in the ERA. Paper prepared for the European Commission (Directorate-General for Research) Expert Group on 'Knowledge and Growth'. Brussels: European Commission.
15. Ernst, R 2003. The responsibility of scientists, a European view. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition) 42, 4434-4439.
16. European Commission 2003. The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, COM(2003) 58 final. Available at , last accessed on 22 October 2008.
17. European Commission 2004. Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe. J Gago, J Ziman, P Caro, C Constantinou, G Davies, I Parchmannn, M Rannikmäe and S Sjøberg eds. Brussels: High Level Group on Human Resources for Science and Technology, European Commission.
18. European Commission 2007. Science Education Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. M Rocard, P Csermely, D Jorde, D Lenzen, H Walberg-Henriksson and V Hemmo eds. EUR Report 22845. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, Science, Economy and Society, European Commission.
19. Gago, J M and M V Heitor 2007. A commitment to science for the future of Portugal. In J M Gago, ed., The Future of Science and Technology in Europe. Lisbon: Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education.
20. Gallagher, M 2008. Personal communication.
21. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzman, P Scott and M Trow 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
22. Goodall, A H 2006. Should research universities be led by top researchers and are they? Journal of Documentation, 62(3), 388-411.
23. Hasan, A 2007. Independent legal status and universities as foundations. Paper prepared for the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, Lisbon.
24. Miller, S, P Caro, V Koulaidis, V Semir, W Staveloz and R Vargas 2002. Report from the Expert Group Benchmarking the promotion of RTD culture and Public Understanding of Science. Available at , last accessed on 22 October 2008.
25. National Academy of Engineering (NAE) 2003. The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance Washington: NAE Press.
26. National Research Council 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, J D Bransford, A L Brown and R R Cocking eds. Washington, DC: Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.
27. Neave, G 1995. The stirring of the prince and the silence of the lambs: the changing assumptions beneath higher education policy, reform and society. In D D Dill and B Sporn eds. Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon.
28. Nelson, R R 2004. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy 33(3), 455-471.
29. OECD (2007), Review of National Systems of Tertiary Education - Portugal. Paris: OECD.
30. Oliveira, P, P Conceição and M V Heitor 1998. Expectations for the university in the age of the knowledge based societies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(3), 203-214.
31. Papert, S 1991. Situating constructionism. In I Harel and S Papert eds., Constructionism, pp. 1-11. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
32. Pavitt, K 1987. The objectives of technology policy, Science and Public Policy, 14(4), 182-188.
33. Piaget, J 1973. To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education. New York: Grossman Publishers.
34. Reeve, M and M Rotondi 1997. From the Center: Design Process at SCI-Arc. New York: Monacelli Press.
35. Rosenberg, N and R R Nelson 1996. The roles of universities in the advance of industrial technology. In R S Rosenbloom and W J Spencer eds. Engines of Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Rosenberg, N 2002. Knowledge and innovation for economic development: should universities be economic institutions? In P Conceição, D V Gibson, M V Heitor, G Sirilli and F Veloso eds. Knowledge for Inclusive Development. Westport, CT: Quorum.
37. Saxenian, A 1986. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. London: Harvard University Press.
38. Solomon, J and J M Gago eds. 1994. Science in School and the Future of Scientific Culture in Europe. Proceedings of the Euroscientia Conference, Lisbon, 14-15 December 1994. Brussels: European Commission.
39. University of California at Los Angeles 1997. The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 1995-96 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute of the University of California at Los Angeles.
40. Vest, C M 2007. The American Research University - from World War II to World Wide Web: Governments, the Private Sector and the Emerging Meta-University. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41. Ziman, J 1968. Public Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Ziman, J 1978. Reliable Knowledge: an Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ziman, J 2000. Real Science: What it is, and What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.