Identification of new Saccharomyces cerevisiae variants of the MET2 and SKP2 genes controlling the sulfur assimilation pathway and the production of undesirable sulfur compounds during alcoholic fermentation

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Noble, Jessica J ^a,b   Sanchez, Isabelle I ^c   Blondin, Bruno B ^c  

^a LALLEMAND SAS   (France)

^b Institut Coopératif du Vin   (France)

^c SPO   (France)

Author keywords

MET2; QTL; SKP2; Sulfide; Sulfite; Wine yeast

Indexed keywords

ACETALDEHYDE; ADENYLYLSULFATE KINASE; CYSTEINE; PROPANOL; SULFITE; SULFUR DERIVATIVE;

ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL METABOLISM; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; FUNGUS IDENTIFICATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HEMIZYGOSITY; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MET2 GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PLEIOTROPY; PROMOTER REGION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SKP2 GENE; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

FERMENTATION; GENES, FUNGAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SULFITES; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

EID: 84929318248     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-015-0245-1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Swiegers JH, Pretorius IS. Modulation of volatile sulfur compound by wine yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(5):954-60.
2. Mendes-Ferreira A, Barbosa C, Falco V, Leao C, Mendes-Faia A. The production of hydrogen sulfide and other aroma compounds by wine yeasts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in synthetic media with different nitrogen concentrations. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;36(4):571-83.
3. Henick-Kling T, Park YH. Considerations for the use of yeasts and bacteria starter cultures: SO2 and timing of inoculation. Am J Enol Vitic. 1994;45(4):464-9.
4. Carreté R, Vidal MT, Bordons A, Constanti M. Inhibitory effect of sulfur dioxide and other stress compounds in wine on the ATPase activity of Oenococcus oeni. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;211:155-9.
5. Cordente AG, Heinrich A, Pretorius IS, Swiegers JH. Isolation of sulfite reductase variants of a commercial wine yeast with significantly reduced hydrogen sulfide production. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:446-59.
6. Linderholm A, Dietzel K, Hirst M, Bisson LF. Identification of MET10-932 and characterization as an allele reducing hydrogen sulfide formation in wine strains of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:7699-707.
7. Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y. Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:503-32.
8. Blaiseau PL, Thomas D. Multiple transcriptional activation complexes tether the yeast activator Met4 to DNA. EMBO J. 1998;17:6327-36.
9. Blaiseau PL, Isnard AD, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Thomas D. Met31p and Met32p, two related zinc finger proteins, are involved in transcriptional regulation of yeast sulfur amino acid metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:3640-8.
10. Kuras L, Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Thomas D. A heteromeric complex containing the centromere binding factor 1 and two basic leucine zipper factors, Met4 and Met28, mediates the transcription activation of yeast sulfur metabolism. EMBO J. 1996;15:2519-29.
11. Thomas D, Jacquemin I, Surdin-Kerjan Y. MET4, a leucine zipper protein, and centromere-binding factor 1 are both required for transcriptional activation of sulfur metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:1719-27.
12. Thomas D, Kuras L, Barbey R, Cherest H, Blaiseau P, Surdin-Kerjan Y. Met30p, a yeast transcriptional inhibitor that responds to S- adenosylmethionine, is an essential protein with WD40 repeats. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:6526-34.
13. Craig K, Tyers M. The F-box: a new motif for ubiquitin dependent proteolysis in cell cycle regulation and signal transduction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1999;72:299-328.
14. Rouillon A, Barbey R, Patton EE, Tyers M, Thomas D. Feedback-regulated degradation of the transcriptional activator Met4 is triggered by the SCFMet30 complex. EMBO J. 2000;19:282-94.
15. Hansen J, Johannesen PF. Cysteine is essential for transcriptional regulation of the sulfur assimilation genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 2000;263:535-42.
16. Natarajan K, Meyer MR, Jackson BM, Slade D, Roberts C, Hinnebusch AG, et al. Transcriptional profiling shows that Gcn4p is a master regulator of gene expression during amino acid starvation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:4347-68.
17. 2 production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2011;28:109-21.
18. 2 formation by brewing yeast in response to sulfur-containing amino acids and ammonium ions. J Am Soc Brew Chem. 2004;62:35-41.
19. Giudici P, Kunkee RE. The effect of nitrogen deficiency and sulfur-containing amino acids on the reduction of sulfate to hydrogen sulfide by wine yeasts. Am J Enol Vitic. 1994;45:107-12.
20. Jiranek V, Langridge P, Henschke PA. Regulation of hydrogen sulfide liberation in wine-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by assimilable nitrogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:461-7.
21. Vos PJA, Gray RS. The origin and control of hydrogen sulfide during fermentation of grape must. Am J Enol Vitic. 1979;30:187-97.
22. Ugliano M, Fedrizzi B, Siebert T, Travis B, Magno F, Versini G, et al. Effect of nitrogen supplementation and saccharomyces species on hydrogen sulfide and other volatile sulfur compounds in shiraz fermentation and wine. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:4948-55.
23. Eschenbruch R. Sulfite and sulfide formation during winemaking - a review. Am J Enol Vitic. 1974;25:157-61.
24. Eschenbruch R, Bonish P. Production of sulphite and sulphide by low-and high-sulphite forming wine yeasts. Arch Microbiol. 1976;107:299-302.
25. Eschenbruch R, Bonish P. The influence of pH on sulphite formation by yeasts. Arch Microbiol. 1976;107:229-31.
26. Wainwright T. Hydrogen sulphide production by yeast under conditions of methionine, pantothenate or vitamin B6 deficiency. J Gen Microbiol. 1970;61:107-19.
27. Kumar GR, Ramakrishnan V, Bisson LF. Survey of hydrogen sulfide production in wine strains of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Am J Enol Vitic. 2010;61:365-71.
28. Spiropoulos A, Tanaka J, Flerianos I, Bisson LF. Characterization of hydrogen sulfide formation in commercial and natural wine isolates of Saccharomyces. Am J Enol Vitic. 2000;51:233-48.
29. Donalies UE, Stahl U. Increasing sulphite formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of MET14 and SSU1. Yeast. 2002;19:475-84.
30. Hansen J, Kielland-brandt MC. Inactivation of MET2 in brewer's yeast increases the level of sulfite in beer. J Biotechnol. 1996;50:75-87.
31. 2 formation during beer production. Nat Biotech. 1996;14:1587-91.
32. Spiropoulos A, Bisson LF. MET17 and hydrogen sulfide formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:4421-6.
33. Linderholm AL, Olineka TL, Hong Y, Bisson LF. Allele diversity among genes of the sulfate reduction pathway in wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Am J Enol Vitic. 2006;57:431-40.
34. Linderholm AL, Findleton CL, Kumar G, Hong Y, Bisson LF. Identification of genes affecting hydrogen sulfide formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:1418-27.
35. Ambroset C, Petit M, Brion C, Sanchez I, Delobel P, Guérin C, et al. Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3. 2011;1:263-81.
36. Marullo P, Aigle M, Bely M, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Durrens P, Dubourdieu D, et al. Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:941-52.
37. Steyer D, Ambroset C, Brion C, Claudel P, Delobel P, Sanchez I, et al. QTL mapping of the production of wine aroma compounds by yeast. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:573.
38. Swinnen S, Schaerlaekens K, Pais T, Claesen J, Hubmann G, Yang Y, et al. Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res. 2012;22:975-84.
39. Rankine CC, Pocock KF. Influence of yeast strain on binding of sulphur dioxide in wines, and on its formation during fermentation. J Sci Fd Agric. 1969;20:104-9.
40. Casalone E, Colella CM, Daly S, Gallori E, Moriani L. Mechanism of resistance to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1992;22(6):435-40.
41. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 2003;20:1369-85.
42. Guidici P, Zambonelli C, Kunkee RE. Increased production of n-propanol in wine by yeast strains having an impaired ability to form hydrogen sulfide. Am J Enol Vitic. 1993;44:17-21.
43. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science. 2002;296:752-5.
44. Cubillos FA, Billi E, Zorgo E, Parts L, Fargier P, Omholt S, et al. Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:1401-13.
45. 2 levels, using integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2787-96.
46. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards D, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, McCusker JH, et al. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature. 2002;416:326-30.
47. Bai C, Sen P, Hofmann K, Ma L, Goebl M, Harper JW, et al. SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-Box. Cell. 1996;86:263-74.
48. Stadtman ER, Cohen GN, Lebras G, Robichon-Szulmajster H. Feedback inhibition and repression of aspartokinase activity in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1961;236:2033-8.
49. Marullo P, Mansour C, Dufour M, Albertin W, Sicard D, Bely M, et al. Genetic improvement of thermo-tolerance in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by a backcross approach. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:1148-60.
50. Schiestl RH, Gietz RD. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr Genet. 1989;16:339-46.
51. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P. Description of alcoholic fermentation kinetics: its variability and significance. Am J Enol Vitic. 1990;41:319-24.
52. Park SK. Development of a method to measure hydrogen sulfide in wine fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(9):1550-4.
53. Ugliano M, Henschke PA. Comparison of three methods for accurate quantification of hydrogen sulfide during fermentation. Analytical Chimica Acta. 2010;660:87-91.
54. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156-9.
55. R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Fundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2011 URL http://www.R-project.org/.
56. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3(1):Article 3.
57. Smyth GK. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W, editors. Bioinformatics and computational biology solutions using R and bioconductor. New-York: Springer; 2005. p. 397-420.
58. Smyth GK, Speed T. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods. 2003;31:265-73.
59. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2067-75.
60. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.
61. Robinson MD, Grigull J, Mohammad N, Hughes TR. FunSpec: a web-based cluster interpreter for yeast. BMC Bioinformatics. 2002;3:35.
62. Lander ES, Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989;121:185-99.
63. Broman KW, Wu H, Sen Ś, Churchill GA. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:889-90.
64. Broman KW, Sen S. A guide to QTL mapping with R/qtl. Statistics for Biology and Health 2009 ISBN978-0-387-92124-2