Factors that Affect Science and Mathematics Teachers' Initial Implementation of Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment Using a Classroom Response System

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 523-539

  Lee, Hyunju ^a   Feldman, Allan ^b   Beatty, Ian D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom response system; Formative assessment; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866732159     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9344-x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abrahamson LA (2006) A brief history of networked classrooms: effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In: Banks DA (ed) Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases. Idea Group, Hershey, pp 1-25.
2. Beatty ID, Gerace WJ (2009) Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. J Sci Educ Technol 18(2): 146-162.
3. Beatty ID, Feldman A, Leonard WJ, Gerace WJ, St. Cyr K, Lee H, Harris R (2008) Teacher learning of technology-enhanced formative assessment. Paper was presented at Annual meeting of National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore.
4. Bell B, Cowie B (2000) Formative assessment and science education. Kluwer, New York.
5. Black P, Wiliam D (1998) Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2): 139-148.
6. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (eds) (1999) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington.
7. Cohen D (1987) Educational technology, policy, and practice. Educ Eval Policy Anal 9: 153-170.
8. Cuban L (1986) Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press, New York.
9. Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
10. Duffield JA (1997) Trials, tribulations, and minor successes: integrating technology into a preservice preparation program. TechTrends 42(4): 22-26.
11. Dufresne RJ, Gerace WJ, Leonard WJ, Mestre JP, Wenk L (1996) Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning in large lecture halls. J Comput High Educ 7(2): 3-47.
12. Duncan D (2006) Clickers: a new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astron Educ Rev 5(1): 70-88.
13. Egbert J, Paulus TM, Nakamichi Y (2002) The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: a foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Lang Learn Technol 6(3): 108-126.
14. Ertmer PA (1999) Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educ Technol Res Dev 47(4): 47-61.
15. Feldman A (1997) Varieties of wisdom in the practice of teachers. Teach Teach Educ 13: 757-773.
16. Feldman A, Capobianco BM (2008) Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. J Sci Educ Technol 17: 82-99.
17. Fies C, Marshall J (2006) Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. J Sci Educ Technol 15(1): 101-109.
18. Gallagher JJ (2000) Teaching for understanding and application of science knowledge. School Sci Math 100(6): 310-318.
19. Hancock V, Betts J (1994) From the lagging to the leading edge. Educ Leadersh 51(7): 24-29.
20. Hope WC (1997) Why technology has not realized its potential in schools. Am Second Educ 25(4): 29.
21. Kay R, Knaack L (2009) Exploring the use of audience response systems in secondary school science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 18: 382-392.
22. Lee H, Feldman A, Beatty ID (2009) Teachers' implementation of classroom response system to perform formative assessment in secondary science/math classes. Proceeding paper presented at annual meeting of National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
24. Penuel WR, Boscardin CL, Masyn K, Crawford VM (2007) Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: a survey study. Educ Technol Res Dev 55: 315-346.
25. Ramaprasad A (1983) On the definition of feedback. Behav Sci 28(1): 4-13.
26. Sadler R (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr Sci 18: 119-144.
27. Schrum LM (1995) Telecommunications for personal and professional uses: a case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
28. Sheingold K, Hadley M (1990) Accomplished teachers: integrating computers into classroom practice. Bank Street College of Education, Center for Technology in Education, New York.
29. Shelton M, Jones M (1996) Staff development that works! A tale of four t's. NAASP Bull 80(582): 99-105.
30. St. Cyr K (2009) Teacher change facilitated by sustained school situated professional development: exemplar learning of Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment (TEFA). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
31. Smerdon B, Cronen S, Lanahan L, Anderson J, Iannotti N, Angeles J, Greene B (2000) Teachers' tools for the 21st century: a report on teachers' use of technology. Statistical Analysis Report. US Department of Education.
32. Stengel B (1996, April). Teaching epistemology through cell reproduction: a narrative exploration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
33. Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and Techniques. Sage, Newbury Park.
34. Trees A, Jackson M (2007) The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learn Media Technol 32(1): 21-40.
35. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
36. Wood E, Mueller J, Willoughby T, Specht J, Deyoung T (2005) Teachers' perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Educ Commun Inf 5(2): 183-206.