The psychology of social justice in political thought and action

Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 275-291

  Rothmund, Tobias ^a   Becker, Julia C ^b   Jost, John T ^c  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Political ideology; Political legitimacy; Procedural justice; Protest behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006745114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_15     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Amstutz, M. R. (2006). Restorative justice, political forgiveness, and the possibility of political reconciliation. In D. Philpott (Ed.), The politics of past evil: Religion, reconciliation, and the dilemmas of transitional justice (pp. 151-188). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
2. Becker, J. C. (2012). The system stabilizing role of identity management strategies: Social creativity can undermine collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 647-662.
3. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101,62-77.
4. Becker, J. C., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E., & Zhou, S. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 442-455.
5. Besley, J. C., & McComas, K. A. (2005). Framing justice: Using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research. Communication Theory, 15, 414-436.
6. Bierbrauer, G., & Klinger, E. W. (2002). Political ideology, perceived threat, and justice towards immigrants. Social Justice Research, 15, 41-52.
7. Bruns, A., Highfield, T., & Burgess, J. (2013). The Arab Spring and social media audiences: English and Arabic Twitter users and their networks. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 871-898.
8. Carroll, J., Perkowitz, W., Lurigio, A., & Weaver, K. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107-118.
9. Christiansen, N. D., & Lavine, H. (1997). Need-efficiency trade-offs in the allocation of resources: Ideological and attributional differences in public aid decision making. Social Justice Research, 10, 289-310.
10. Clawson, R. A., Kegler, E. R., & Waltenburg, E. N. (2001). The legitimacy-conferring authority of the U.S. supreme court an experimental design. American Politics Research, 29, 566-591.
11. Cohen, R. L. (2016). Restorative justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 257-272). New York, NY: Springer.
12. Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1183-1206.
13. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151-218.
14. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
15. Dixon, J., Levine, M., Reicher, S., & Durrheim, K. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411-425.
16. Doyle, E., Gallery, K., Coyle, M., & Commissioners, I. R. (2009). Procedural justice principles and tax compliance in Ireland: A preliminary exploration in the context of reminder letters. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 8, 49-62.
17. Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861-1893.
18. Farnsworth, S. J. (2003). Congress and citizen discontent public evaluations of the membership and ones own representative. American Politics Research, 31(1), 66-80.
19. Feather, N. T. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations for unemployment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 876-889.
20. Feygina, I., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Procedural justice and system-justifying motivations. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 351— 370). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Furnham, A. (1982a). Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 311-322.
22. Furnham, A. (1982b). Explanations for unemployment in Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 335-352.
23. Gangl, A. (2003). Procedural justice theory and evaluations of the lawmaking process. Political Behavior, 25, 119-149.
24. Gewirth, A. (1984). Ethics. In The encyclopedia Britannica (15th ed., Vol. 6, pp. 976-998). Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.
25. Gibson, J. L. (2006). Overcoming apartheid: Can truth reconcile a divided nation? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 60, 82-110.
26. Gibson, J. L., Caldiera, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003). The Supreme Court and the U.S. presidential election of 2000: Wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise? British Journal of Political Science, 33, 535-556.
27. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. London: Psychology Press.
28. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
29. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
30. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
31. Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 797-832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
32. Haley, H., & Sidanius, J. (2006). The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 656-668.
33. Hegtvedt, K. A., Johnson, C., & Watson, L. (2016). Social dynamics of legitimacy and justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 425-444). New York, NY: Springer.
34. Jasso, G., Tornblom, K., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 201-218). New York, NY: Springer.
35. Jost, J. T. (2012). Left and right, right and wrong. Science, 337, 525-526.
36. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of falseconsciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
37. Jost, J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis, V., Abrams, D., Sidanius, J., van der Toorn, J., & Bratt, C. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197-200.
38. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337.
39. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
40. Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. A., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2014). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56-81.
41. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
42. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
43. Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (Eds.). (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
45. Jost, J. T., Stern, C., & Kalkstein, D. A. (2012). What’s so insidious about “peace, love, and understanding”? A system justification perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 28-29.
46. Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2012). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313-343). London, England: Sage.
47. Kang, S., & Gearhart, S. (2010). E-government and civic engagement: How is citizens’ use of city web sites related with civic involvement and political behaviors? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 443-462.
48. Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
49. Kershaw, T. S., & Alexander, S. (2003). Procedural fairness, blame attributions, and presidential leadership. Social Justice Research, 16, 79-93.
50. Klandermans, B. (1997). The socialpsychology ofprotest. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
51. Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Hogan, C. M., & Chow, R. M. (2009). On the malleability of ideology: Motivated construals of color blindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 857-869.
52. Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184-194.
53. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The beliefin ajust world: Afunda-mental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
54. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Plenum.
55. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56. Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245-274.
57. McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978-990.
58. McCloskey, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341-351.
60. Meyer, L., & Sanklecha, P. (2016). Philosophy of justice: Extending liberal justice in space and time. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 15-35). New York, NY: Springer.
61. Miller, W. (1973). Ideology and criminal justice policy: Some current issues. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 141-162.
62. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordonez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 629-639.
63. Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Newman, D. G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). Experiments behind the veil: Structural influences on judgments of social justice. Political Psychology, 24, 519-547.
64. Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The psychology of dictatorship. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65. Montada, L. (2007). Conflicts and the justice of conflict resolution. In K. Tornblom & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Distributive and procedural justice. Research and applications (pp. 255-268). Burlington, VT: Ashgate/Glower.
66. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245.
67. Murphy, K. (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 187-209.
68. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565-572.
69. Napier, J. L., Mandisodza, A. N., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57-73.
70. Olson, J. A., & Hafer, C. L. (2001). Tolerance of personal deprivation. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 157-175). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71. Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991-1004.
72. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.
73. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.
74. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741.
75. Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20, 127-150.
76. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
77. Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What’s fair is fair—Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 201-211.
78. Rothmund, T., Baumert, A., & Zinkernagel, A. (2014). The German “Wutburger”: How justice sensitivity accounts for individual differences in political engagement. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 24-44. doi: 10.1007/s 11211-014-0202-x.
79. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
80. Sachweh, P. (2016). Social justice and the welfare state: Institutions, outcomes, and attitudes in comparative perspective. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 293-313). New York, NY: Springer.
81. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
83. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491-522.
84. Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
85. Skitka, L. J. (2009). Exploring the “lost and found” of j ustice theory and research. Social Justice Research, 22, 98-116.
86. Smith, H. R., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
87. Sniderman, P. M., Hagen, M. G., Tetlock, P. E., & Brady, H. E. (1986). Reasoning chains: Causal models of policy reasoning in mass publics. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 405-430.
88. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., Garcia, D. M., Gee, S. S., & Orazietti, K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 433-450.
89. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90. Stroebe, K. (2013). Motivated inaction: When collective disadvantage does not induce collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1997-2006.
91. Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 59-99). Chichester, England: Wiley.
92. Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330-352.
93. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
94. Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behaviour: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148.
95. Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., & Daamen, D. D. L. (2010). Voice in political decision-making: The effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(2), 173-186.
96. Tyler, T. R. (1984). Justice in the political arena. In R. Folger (Ed.), Justice: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 189-225). New York, NY: Plenum.
97. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
98. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
99. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100. Tyler, T. R. (2011). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 254-266.
101. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361.
102. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
103. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts through. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
104. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2013). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 78-95.
105. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
106. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & McGraw, K. (1985). The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 700-725.
107. Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42, 253-282.
108. United Nations. (2014). The universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr
109. Vainio, A. (2011). Why are forest owners satisfied with forest policy decisions? Legitimacy, procedural justice, and perceived uncertainty. Social Justice Research, 24, 239-254.
110. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
111. van der Toorn, J., Napier, J. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). We the people: Intergroup interdependence breeds liberalism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 616-622.
112. van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 127-138.
113. Van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 488-502.
114. Van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169-173.
115. Van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 23-42.
116. van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, P. G. (2010). Individuals in movements: A social psychology of contention [reprint of 2007]. In P. G. Klandermans & C. M. Roggeband (Eds.), The handbook of social movements across disciplines (pp. 157-204). New York, NY: Springer.
117. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
118. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
119. Vermunt, R., & Steensma, H. (2016). Procedural justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 219-236). New York, NY: Springer.
120. Wakslak, C., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274.
121. Weiner, B., Osborne, D., & Rudolph, U. (2011). An attri-butional analysis of reactions to poverty: The political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 199-213.
122. Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers’ identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629-645.
123. Wenzel, M. (2006). A letter from the tax office: Compliance effects of informational and interpersonal justice. Social Justice Research, 19, 345-364.
124. Whitman, D. S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N. C., Horner, M. T., & Bernerth, J. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 776-791.
125. Wright, S. C. (2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 409-430). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
126. Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. E. (2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291-310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
127. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1999). Success under tokenism: Co-option of the newcomer and the prevention of collective protest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 369-396.