The merit of meritocracy

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 433-450

  Son Hing, Leanne S ^a   Bobocel, D Ramona ^b   Zanna, Mark P ^b   Garcia, Donna M ^a   Gee, Stephanie S ^a   Orazietti, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Affirmative action; Diversity initiatives; Justice; Meritocracy; System justification

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTHORITARIANISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052218606     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024618     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology 1965, Vol. 2:267-299. Academic Press, New York, NY. L. Berkowitz (Ed.).
2. Agócs C., Burr C. Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity: Assessing the differences. International Journal of Manpower 1996, 17:30-45. 10.1108/01437729610127668.
3. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
4. Altemeyer R.A. Reducing prejudice in right-wing authoritarians. The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium 1994, Vol. 7:131-148. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson (Eds.).
5. Altemeyer R.A. The authoritarian specter 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Altemeyer R.A. The other "authoritarian personality." Advances in experimental social psychology 1998, Vol. 30:47-92. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
7. Aryee S., Budhwar P.S., Chen Z.X. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2002, 23:267-285. 10.1002/job.138.
8. Blair I.V., Banaji M. Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:1142-1163. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142.
9. Bobocel D.R., Son Hing L.S., Davey L.M., Stanley D.J., Zanna M.P. Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:653-669. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.653.
10. Brodish A.B., Brady P.C., Devine P.G. More eyes on the prize: Variability in White Americans' perceptions of progress toward racial equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:513-527. 10.1177/0146167207311337.
11. Brosnan S.F. Nonhuman species' reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research 2006, 19:153-185. 10.1007/s11211-006-0002-z.
12. Castilla E.J., Benard S. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 2010, 55:543-576. 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543.
13. Chung-Yan G.A., Cronshaw S.F. A critical re-examination and analysis of cognitive ability tests using the Thorndike model of fairness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2002, 75:489-509. 10.1348/096317902321119709.
14. Cook K.S., Hegtvedt K.A. Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology 1983, 9:217-241. http://www.annualreviews.org/loi/soc.
15. Davey L.M., Bobocel D.R., Son Hing L.S., Zanna M.P. Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research 1999, 12:223-240. 10.1023/A:1022148418210.
16. Deutsch M. Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. Journal of Social Issues 1975, 31:137-149. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.
17. Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L. Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues 1996, 52:51-75. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01848.x.
18. Duckitt J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:684-696. 10.1177/0146167205284282.
19. Eagly A.H., Mladinic A. Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1989, 15:543-558. 10.1177/0146167289154008.
20. Eidelman S., Crandall C.S., Pattershall J. The existence of bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:765-775. 10.1037/a0017058.
21. Federico C.M., Sidanius J. Racism, ideology, and affirmative action, revisited: The antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:488-502. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.488.
22. Fischer R., Smith P.B. Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2003, 34:251-268. 10.1177/0022022103034003001.
23. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:878-902. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
24. Foster M.D., Sloto L., Ruby R. Responding to discrimination as a function of meritocracy beliefs and personal experiences: Testing the model for shattered assumptions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2006, 9:401-411. 10.1177/1368430206064641.
25. Fraser J., Kick E. The interpretive repertoires of Whites on race-targeted policies: Claims making of reverse discrimination. Sociological Perspectives 2000, 43:13-28.
26. Garcia D.M., Desmarais S., Branscombe N.R., Gee S.S. Opposition to redistributive employment policies for women: The role of policy experience and group interest. British Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 44:583-602. 10.1348/014466604X17542.
27. Garcia, D. M., Desmarais, S., Jackson, L. M., & Pancer, S. M. (2001, May). Meritocratic ideology and resistance to equity programs: Principled objection or rationalized prejudice? Poster session presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
28. Gibbons J.A., Sherwood R.D. Repeated measures/randomized blocks ANOVA through the use of criterion-scaled regression analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1985, 45:711-724. 10.1177/0013164485454001.
29. Greenberg J. Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 1988, 73:606-613. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.606.
30. Greenberg J., Leventhal G.S. Equity and the use of overreward to motivate performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976, 34:179-190. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.179.
31. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1464-1480.
32. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A. Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 2001, 48:85-93. 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85.
33. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:197-216. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
34. Greenwald A.G., Poehlman T.A., Uhlmann E.L., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97:17-41. 10.1037/a0015575.
35. Haines E.L., Jost J.T. Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research 2000, 13:219-236. 10.1023/A:1026481205719.
36. Haley H., Sidanius J. The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:656-668. 10.1177/0146167205283442.
37. Haney C., Hurtado A. The jurisprudence of race and meritocracy: Standardized testing and "race neutral" racism in the workplace. Law and Human Behavior 1994, 18:223-248. 10.1007/BF01499586.
38. Harrison D.A., Kravitz D.A., Mayer D.M., Leslie L.M., Lev-Arey D. Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 2006, 91:1013-1036. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1013.
39. Henry P.J., Sears D.O. The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Political Psychology 2002, 23:253-283. 10.1111/0162-895X.00281.
40. Hodson G., Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L. Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2002, 28:460-471. 10.1177/0146167202287004.
41. Holmbeck G.N. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2002, 27:87-96. 10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.87.
42. Hook J., Cook T. Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:429-445. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.429.
43. Hunter J.E. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1986, 29:340-362. 10.1016/0001-8791(86)90013-8.
44. Jackson L.M., Esses V.M., Burris C.T. Contemporary sexism and discrimination: The importance of respect for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001, 27:48-61. 10.1177/0146167201271005.
45. Jost J.T. Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition 2001, 89-102. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. G. Moskowitz (Ed.).
46. Jost J.T. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 2006, 61:651-670. 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651.
47. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R., Nosek B.A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology 2004, 25:881-919. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
48. Jost J.T., Hunyady O. Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:260-265. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x.
49. Jost J.T., Pelham B.W., Sheldon O., Sullivan B. Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 33:13-36. 10.1002/ejsp.127.
50. Jost J.T., Thompson E.P. Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2000, 36:209-232. 10.1006/jesp.1999.1403.
51. Kalev A., Dobbin F., Kelly E. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review 2006, 71:589-617. 10.1177/000312240607100404.
52. Kay A.C., Banfield J.C., Laurin K. The system justification motive and the maintenance of social power. The social psychology of power 2010, 313-340. Guilford Press, New York, NY. A. Guinote, T.K. Vescio (Eds.).
53. Konrad A.M., Hartmann L. Gender differences in attitudes toward affirmative action programs in Australia: Effects of beliefs, interests, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles 2001, 45:415-432. 10.1023/A:1014317800293.
54. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108:480-498. 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
55. Lalonde R.N., Doan L., Patterson L.A. Political correctness beliefs, threatened identities, and social attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2000, 3:317-336. 10.1177/1368430200033006.
56. Lambert A.J., Payne B.K., Ramsey S., Shaffer L.M. On the predictive validity of implicit attitude measures: The moderating effect of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:114-128. 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.006.
57. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and its forms. Journal of Personality 1977, 45:1-52. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.
58. Leventhal G.S. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1976, 9:91-131. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60059-3.
59. Levy S.R., West T., Ramirez L., Karafantis D.M. The Protestant work ethic: A lay theory with dual intergroup implications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2006, 9:95-115. 10.1177/1368430206059874.
60. Lowery B.S., Unzueta M.M., Knowles E.D., Goff P.A. Concern for the ingroup and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:961-974. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961.
61. Major B., Kaiser C., O'Brien L.T., McCoy S.K. Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:1068-1086. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068.
62. McConahay J.B. Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism 1986, 91-125. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. J.F. Dovidio, S.L. Gaertner (Eds.).
63. McCoy S.K., Major B. Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:341-351. 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009.
64. McFarland, S. G., & Adelson, S. (1996, July). An omnibus study of personality, values, and prejudice. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
65. McFarlin D.B., Sweeney P.D. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 1992, 35:626-637. 10.2307/256489.
66. McNamee S.J., Miller R.K. The meritocracy myth 2004, Rowan & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
67. Napier J.L., Jost J. Why are conservatives happier than liberals?. Psychological Science 2008, 19:565-572. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x.
68. O'Brien L.T., Major B.N. System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:1718-1729. 10.1177/0146167205278261.
69. Oldmeadow J., Fiske S.T. System-justifying ideologies moderate status = competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:1135-1148. 10.1002/ejsp.428.
70. Paulhus D.L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:598-609. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598.
71. Pedhazur E.J. Multiple regression in behavioral research 1982, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, TX. 2nd ed.
72. Pillai R., Schriesheim C.A., Williams E.S. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management 1999, 25:897-933. 10.1177/014920639902500606.
73. Pratto F., Sidianus J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:741-763. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
74. Price J.L., Mueller C.W. A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal 1981, 24:543-565. 10.2307/255574.
75. Reyna C., Henry P.J., Korfmacher W., Tucker A. Examining the principles in principled conservatism: The role of responsibility stereotypes as cues for deservingness in racial policy decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:109-128. 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.109.
76. Reyna C., Tucker A., Korfmacher W., Henry P. Searching for common ground between supporters and opponents of affirmative action. Political Psychology 2005, 26:667-682. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00438.x.
77. Richard O.C., Fubara E.I., Castillo M.N. The impact of explanations and demographic group membership: Reactions of diversity initiatives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2000, 30:1039-1055. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02509.x.
78. Richeson J.A., Ambady N. Who's in charge? Effects of situational roles on automatic gender bias. Sex Roles 2001, 44:493-512. 10.1023/A:1012242123824.
79. Ridgeway C.L. Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 2001, 57:637-655. 10.1111/0022-4537.00233.
80. Roithmayr D. Deconstructing the distinction between bias and merit. California Law Review 1997, 85:1449-1507. http://www.biblioteca.uprrp.edu/latcritcd/Publications/PublishedSymposium/JSICalifornia&LaRaza(1997)/JS1DRoithmayr.pdf.
81. Rosenberg S., Nelson C., Vivekananthan P.S. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 9:283-294. 10.1037/h0026086.
82. Rothermund K., Wentura D. Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:139-165. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139.
83. Rudman L.A. Social justice in our minds, homes and society: The nature, causes and consequences of implicit bias. Social Justice Research 2004, 17:129-142. 10.1023/B:SORE.0000027406.32604.f6.
84. Rudman L.A., Goodwin S.A. Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 87:494-509. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494.
85. Sears D.O., Henry P.J. The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:259-275. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.259.
86. Sidanius J., Devereux E., Pratto F. A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory as explanations for racial policy attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology 1992, 132:377-395. 10.1080/00224545.1992.9924713.
87. Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression 1999, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
88. Sidanius J., Pratto F., Bobo L. Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:476-490. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476.
89. Smith-Winkelman C., Crosby F.J. Affirmative action: Setting the record straight. Social Justice Research 1994, 7:309-328. 10.1007/BF02334859.
90. Sniderman P.M., Carmines E.G. Reaching beyond race 1997, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
91. Sniderman P.M., Piazza T. The scar of race 1993, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
92. Son Hing L.S., Bobocel D.R., Zanna M.P. Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:493-509. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.493.
93. Son Hing L.S., Chung-Yan G.A., Hamilton L.K., Zanna M.P. A two-dimensional model that employs explicit and implicit attitudes to characterize prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:971-987. 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.971.
94. Son Hing L.S., Zanna M.P. Individual differences in prejudice. The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination 2010, 163-178. Sage, London, England. J. Dovidio, P.M. Hewstone, P. Glick, V. Esses (Eds.).
95. Swim J., Aikin K., Hall W., Hunter B. Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:199-214. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
96. Taggar S., Jain H., Gunderson M. The status of employment equity in Canada: An assessment. Proceedings of forty-ninth annual meeting 1997, 331-339. Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI.
97. Tougas F., Brown R., Beaton A.M., Joly S. Neo-sexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21:842-849. 10.1177/0146167295218007.
98. Walton G.M., Spencer S.J. Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1132-1139. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x.
99. Young M. The rise of the meritocracy 1958, Thames & Hudson, London, England.
100. Young M. Down with meritocracy: The man who coined the word four decades ago wishes Tony Blair would stop using it. The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/jun/29/comment.