The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction

Intergroup Misunderstandings Impact of Divergent Social Realities

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 291-310

  Wright, Stephen C ^a   Lubensky, Micah E ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920712117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203848814     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Aronson, E. & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. New York: Longman.
3. Branscombe, N. R. & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 243–266). New York: Academic Press.
4. Brewer, M. B. & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 554–594). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
5. Brewer, M. B. & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
6. Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
7. Brown, R. & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
8. Crisp, R. J., Hewstone, M., & Rubin, M. (2001). Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 76–89.
9. Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76.
10. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.
11. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & L. Gardner (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Gaertner S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
13. Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53–76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
15. Hewstone, M. & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis.’ In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Social psychology and society (pp. 1–44). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16. Hopkins, N. & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2006). Minority group members’ theories of intergroup contact: A case study of British Muslims’ conceptualizations of ‘Islamophobia’ and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 245–264.
17. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. Jones, J. M. (1997). Prejudice and racism (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Jost, J. & Kay, A. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509.
20. Kelly, C. & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice, and gender. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
21. Kelman, H. C. (2007). The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes: Insights from attitude theory. American Psychologist, 63, 287–303.
22. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
23. Leach, C., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245.
24. Martin, J. (1986). The tolerance of injustice. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison (pp. 217–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387–410.
26. Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.
27. Nagda, B. & Gurin, P. (2006). Just a friend? Or a just friend? Paper presented at the 6th Biennial Convention of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues: Social Justice: Research, Action and Policy. Long Beach, CA.
28. Nelson, T. D. (2002). The psychology of prejudice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Oegema, D. & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. American Sociological Review, 59, 703–722.
30. Pettigrew, T. (1996). How to think like a social scientist. New York: HarperCollins.
31. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185.
32. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
33. Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
34. Reynolds, K., Oakes, P., Haslam, A., Nolan, M., & Dolnik, L. (2000). Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 275–290.
35. Richards, Z. & Hewstone, M. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 52–73.
36. Richeson, J. & Nussbaum, R. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color- blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423.
37. Rosenthal, H. E. S. & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Reducing stereotype threat by blurring intergroup boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501–511.
38. Simon, B. (2004). Identity in modern society. A social psychological perspective. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
39. Simon, B. & Klandermans B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.
40. Stürmer, S. & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263–277.
41. Swim, J. K. & Stangor, C. (Eds.) (1998). Prejudice: The target’s perspective. New York: Academic Press.
42. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43. Taylor, D. M. & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International and social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
44. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell.
45. Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, shared consensus and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277–1290.
46. Wright, S. C. (2001a). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
47. Wright, S. C. (2001b). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity and the tolerance of injustice. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 223–254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Including others (and their groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In J. P. Forgas & K. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343–63). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
49. Wright, S. C., Brody, S. M., & Aron, A. (2005). Intergroup contact: Still our best hope for improving intergroup relations. In C. S. Crandall & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 115–142). Seattle, WA: Lewinian Press.
50. Wright, S. C. & Taylor, D. M. (2003). The social psychology of cultural diversity: Social stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.
52. Wright, S. C. & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200–236). New York: Cambridge University Press.