Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1183-1206

  Colquitt, Jason A ^a   Rodell, Jessica B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855179199     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.0572     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2: 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
2. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. 2003. Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 295-305. (Pubitemid 36507873)
3. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. 2002. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 267-285. (Pubitemid 37282924)
4. Azjen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.
5. Azjen, I., & Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Begley, T. M., Lee, C., & Hui, C. 2006. Organizational leadership as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 705-721. (Pubitemid 44221288)
7. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, vol. 1: 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. 2003. What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13: 107-126. (Pubitemid 36153441)
9. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
10. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. 1995. Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 390-413. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86: 278-321. (Pubitemid 33132714)
12. Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386-400. (Pubitemid 33403965)
13. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millen nium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organi zational justice research. Journal of Applied Psy chology, 86: 425-445. (Pubitemid 33403969)
14. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. 2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-ana-lytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 909-927.
15. Cook, J., & Wall, T. D. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
16. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. 2001. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, so cial entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 164-209. (Pubitemid 33378746)
17. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31: 874-900. (Pubitemid 41694500)
18. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C., & Chen, P. Y. 2002. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27: 324-351. (Pubitemid 36668511)
19. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. 2001. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12: 450-467.
20. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. 2002. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 611-628.
21. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. 2005. From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 659-676. (Pubitemid 41304792)
22. Farrell, A. D. 1994. Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62: 477-487. (Pubitemid 24198422)
23. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. 1980. Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 77-94. New York: Plenum.
24. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 115-130.
25. Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., Gavin, M., Gotty, J., & Snow, D. B. 2010. Organizational justice, trustworthiness, and trust: A multifoci examination. Group and Organization Management, 35: 39-76.
26. Gabarro, J. J., & Athos, J. 1976. Interpersonal relations and communications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. 2000. The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26: 657-684.
28. Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161-178.
29. Greenberg, J. 1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12: 9-22.
30. Greenberg, J. 1993. The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management: 79-103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. 2002. Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 916-928.
32. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. 1993. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 502-526.
33. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
34. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 656-669.
35. Korsgaard, M. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Schweiger, D. M. 2002. Beaten before begun: The role of procedural justice in planning change. Journal of Management, 28: 497-516.
36. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60-84.
37. Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 131-142.
38. Leventhal, G. S. 1976. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkow-itz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 9: 91-131. New York: Academic Press.
39. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55. New York: Plenum.
40. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. 1995. Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Banker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: 133-173. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Lewicki, R. J., Wiethoff, C., & Tomlinson, E. C. 2005. What is the role of trust in organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 247-270. Mahwah, NJ: Erl-baum.
42. Lind, E. A. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 56-88. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
44. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. 1997. Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 767-780.
45. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 123-136.
46. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.
47. Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. 2005. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48: 874-888. (Pubitemid 41759582)
48. McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59.
49. Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. 2002. Compensation. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
50. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14: 224-247.
51. Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. 1997. Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Education Review, 21: 614-635. (Pubitemid 127455636)
52. Organ, D. W. 1990. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 12: 43-72. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53. Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. 1999. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25: 897-933.
54. Pillai, R., Williams, E. S., & Tan, J. J. 2001. Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). International Journal of Conflict Management, 12: 312-332. (Pubitemid 33677274)
55. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsa-koff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879-903. (Pubitemid 37239703)
56. Roberts, K. H., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1974. Measuring organizational communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 321-326.
57. Robinson, S. L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 574-599.
58. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23: 393-404. (Pubitemid 128114429)
59. Rupp, D. R., & Cropanzano, R. 2002. The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 925-946.
60. Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., & McKenna, J. F. 1987. Referent selection in determining equity perceptions: Differential effects on behavioral and attitu-dinal outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 40: 113-124.
61. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 2007. An integrative model of organizational trust: Present, past, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32: 344-354.
62. Schwab, D. P. 1980. Construct validity in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 2: 3-43. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
63. Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. 2005. How can training be used to foster organizational justice? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 499-522. Mahwah, NJ: Erl-baum.
64. Stinglhamber, F., De Cremer, D., & Mercken, L. 2006. Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust. Group and Organization Management, 31: 442-468. (Pubitemid 44022536)
65. Stone-Romero, E. F. 1994. Construct validity issues in organizational behavior research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science: 155-179. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Tyler, T. R. 1989. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 830-838.
68. Tyler, T. R. 1994. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive justice and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 850-863.
69. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. 1996. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 913-930. (Pubitemid 126420719)
70. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25: 115-191. San Diego: Academic Press.
71. Van den Bos, K. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice: 63-84. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
72. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. 1998. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 1449-1458.