The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 187-209

  Murphy, Kristina ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Compliance; Procedural justice; Regulation tax avoidance; Trust

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITY; BEHAVIOR; CRIME; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EMPIRICISM; HUMAN; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLICY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; REVIEW; TAX; TAXONOMY; TECHNIQUE; TRUST; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRALIA; CRIME; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TAXES; TRUST;

EID: 2942542849     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Black, J. (2001). Managing discretion. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics, UK.
4. Braithwaite, J. (1993). Responsive business regulatory institutions. In C. J. Coady, & C. J. Sampson (Eds.), Business ethics and the law (pp. 83-92). Sydney: Federation Press.
5. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Braithwaite, J., & Makkai, T. (1994). Trust and compliance. Policing and Society, 4, 1-12.
7. Braithwaite, V. (1995). Games of engagement: Postures within the regulatory community. Law and Policy, 17, 225-255.
8. Braithwaite, V. (1997). Trust in institutions. In J. Kelly, M. D. R. Evans, C. Bean, K. Zagorski, & V. Braithwaite (Eds.), International Social Science Surveys Australia (pp. 37-39). Canberra: The International Social Survey Program, Research School of the Social Sciences, The Australian National University.
9. Braithwaite, V. (2001). The Australian Tax System: Fair or not survey. Canberra: Centre for Tax System Integrity, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University.
10. Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy (pp. 15-39). Aldershot: Ashgate.
11. Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (1998). Trust and governance. New York: Sage.
12. Casper, J. D., Tyler, T. R., & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483-507.
13. Cherney, A. (1997). Trust as a regulatory strategy: A theoretical review. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 9(1), 71-84.
14. Commissioner of Taxation. (2000). Australian Taxation Office Annual Report 1999-2000. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
15. Cook, K. S., & Levi, M. (1990). The limits of rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
17. Feld, L., & Frey, B. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 32. Canberra: The Australian National University.
18. Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1993). Corporations, crime and accountability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
20. Frey, B. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. Economic Journal, 107, 1043-1053.
21. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust, making and breaking cooperative relations. New York: Basil Blackwell.
22. Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24, 837-861.
23. Hawkins, K. (1990). Compliance strategy, prosecution policy and Aunt Sally: A comment on Pearce and Tombs. British Journal of Criminology, 30(4), 444-466.
24. Kagan, R. A., & Scholz, J. T. (1984). The criminology of the corporation and regulatory enforcement strategies. In K. Hawkins, & J. M. Thomas (Eds.), Enforcing regulation (pp. 67-95). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
25. Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1993). Procedural justice, attitudes and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 502-526.
26. Kinsey, K. A., Grasmick, H. G., & Smith, K. W. (1991). Framing justice: Taxpayer evaluations of personal tax burdens. Law and Society Review, 25, 845-873.
27. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. London: Sage.
28. Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and Governance (pp. 77-101). New York: Sage.
29. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. A., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
30. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
31. McBarnet, D. (2003). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy (pp. 229-243). Alderslot: Ashgate.
32. Mearns, M., & Braithwaite, V. (2001). The community hopes, fears and actions survey: Survey method, sample representativeness and data quality. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 4. Canberra: The Australian National University.
33. Murphy, K. (2002a). Procedural Justice and the Australian Taxation Office: A Study of Scheme Investors. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 35. Canberra: The Australian National University.
34. Murphy, K. (2002b). The Australian Tax System Survey of Tax Scheme Investors. Canberra: The Australian National University, The Centre for Tax System Integrity, Research School of Social Sciences.
35. Murphy, K. (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 379-408.
36. Murphy, K., & Byng, K. (2002a). A user's guide to the Australian Tax System Survey of tax scheme investors. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 39. Canberra: The Australian National University.
37. Murphy, K., & Byng, K. (2002b). Preliminary findings from the Australian Tax System Survey of Tax Scheme Investors. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 40. Canberra: The Australian National University.
38. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398-417.
40. Shapiro, S. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 623-658.
41. Shapiro, S. (1990). Collaring the crime, not the criminal: Reconsidering the concept of white-collar crime. American Sociological Review, 55, 346-365.
42. Sparrow, M. K. (2000). The regulatory craft: Controlling risks, solving problems and managing compliance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
43. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
44. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
45. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
46. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323-345.
47. Tyler, T. R. (1998). Public mistrust of the law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 66, 847-876.
48. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Trust and law-abidingness: A proactive model of social regulation. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 16. Canberra: The Australian National University.
49. Tyler, T. R. (2001). Trust and law-abidingness: A proactive model of social regulation. Boston University Law Review, 81(2), 361-406.
50. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
51. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Community, family, and the social good: The psychological dynamics of procedural justice and social identification. In G. Melton (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 42 (pp. 53-92). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
52. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331-356). London: Sage.
53. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol 25 (pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
54. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. G. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.), Vol II) (pp. 595-629). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Wallschutzky, I. G. (1984). Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 5, 371-384.
56. Wallschutzky, I. G. (1996). Issues in research methods: With reference to income tax research. Unpublished manuscript, University of Newcastle, Australia.
57. Wenzel, M. (2002). The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 629-645.